Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Le Gaucher

(1,547 posts) Thu Nov 29, 2018, 07:48 PM Nov 2018

Who is the pissfart currently on Ari Melber?

Just curious.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who is the pissfart currently on Ari Melber? (Original Post) Le Gaucher Nov 2018 OP

Dump's personal attorney, before Cohen. roamer65 Nov 2018 #1

Jay Goldberg BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #2

his personal lawyer from the 90s to 2006 jodymarie aimee Nov 2018 #3

Old man Cohn, old trump attorney or his dads. Can't recall. Mob attorney onecaliberal Nov 2018 #4

Tiny's former lawyer. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2018 #5

roamer65

(37,953 posts)

1. Dump's personal attorney, before Cohen.

Reply to Le Gaucher (Original post)

Thu Nov 29, 2018, 07:49 PM

Nov 2018

He knows his ass is in a sling as well. He’s lying like it.

BumRushDaShow

(169,755 posts)

2. Jay Goldberg

Reply to Le Gaucher (Original post)

Thu Nov 29, 2018, 07:49 PM

Nov 2018

Drumpf's previous lawyer.

This guy -

(phoned it in)

jodymarie aimee

(3,975 posts)

3. his personal lawyer from the 90s to 2006

Reply to Le Gaucher (Original post)

Thu Nov 29, 2018, 07:49 PM

Nov 2018

Jay Goldberg...loyalist to the end and perhaps abit of ALZ...when he said the tin cups and jail rape, Corn lost it !!

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)

4. Old man Cohn, old trump attorney or his dads. Can't recall. Mob attorney

Reply to Le Gaucher (Original post)

Thu Nov 29, 2018, 07:50 PM

Nov 2018

The Velveteen Ocelot

(130,533 posts)

5. Tiny's former lawyer.

Reply to Le Gaucher (Original post)

Thu Nov 29, 2018, 07:50 PM

Nov 2018

Tiresome old crank.

Reply to this discussion