"Reminder: there is no law that says a President can't be indicted.

[sweetroxie]

It is a Justice department memorandum advocated over the years by people who wanted to protect the President they were serving. It might be time to test this in court." - Matthew Dowd

[unblock]

1. yes! tired of the msm acting as if this is something settled and everyone agrees.

it's just a stupid policy by people who think a republican president should be above the law, at least as long as they're in office.

even those who agree with this crap would never abide by it if a democratic president were accused of a fraction of what donnie did.


that said, how does it get tested if donnie's doj simply never indicted him?

on this front, i think we have a better chance of him getting indicted at the state level, which is a slightly different constitutional question, and it's possible that the supreme court could decide that case without opining on whether or not the same logic would apply at the federal level.

[uponit7771]

2. Wait, wasn't Agnew indicted? thx in advance

[elocs]

3. Reminder: the Supreme Court will decide that if it come up.

And how might this Supreme Court decide on that?