Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,893 posts)
Mon Dec 10, 2018, 03:38 PM Dec 2018

Jury deciding sentence for man who rammed rally protesters

Source: Associated Press

Jury deciding sentence for man who rammed rally protesters

December 10, 2018

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (AP) — Several people who were severely injured when a man drove his car into counterprotesters at a white nationalist rally last year described devastating physical and psychological effects to a jury tasked with making a sentencing recommendation Monday.

Jurors on Friday convicted James Alex Fields Jr. of first-degree murder and other charges for ramming his car into a crowd in Charlottesville during a “Unite the Right” rally on Aug. 12, 2017. Heather Heyer, a 32-year-old paralegal, was killed and dozens were injured. Under the law, the jury can recommend from 20 years to life in prison.

Heyer’s mother, Susan Bro, told jurors that her daughter’s death has been “an explosion in our family” and “we are forever scarred by the pain.”

“Some days I can’t do anything but cry and sit and stare as the grief overtakes me,” she said.

-snip-


Read more: https://apnews.com/382f1dcf62624f579fe0fcd51fdf3d7a
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jury deciding sentence for man who rammed rally protesters (Original Post) Eugene Dec 2018 OP
Interesting that death is not an option berni_mccoy Dec 2018 #1
That's now how law works. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2018 #2
I still could be a death penalty case PJMcK Dec 2018 #3
Life in prison is actually less expensive when you take the automatic appeals into account YessirAtsaFact Dec 2018 #4
All good reasons PJMcK Dec 2018 #5
That argument has always bothered me, because the automatic appeals are there to LongtimeAZDem Dec 2018 #6
 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
1. Interesting that death is not an option
Mon Dec 10, 2018, 03:45 PM
Dec 2018

He committed the crime as an act of terrorism. That should qualify it for the death sentence.

PJMcK

(22,035 posts)
3. I still could be a death penalty case
Mon Dec 10, 2018, 03:49 PM
Dec 2018

If he's tried in a Federal court with the enchanted hate crime charges he would be eligible for the death penalty.

I'm fundamentally opposed to the government being able to take someone's life. Life in prison without parole is a far better punishment and it is the morally correct behavior for an advanced society.

YessirAtsaFact

(2,064 posts)
4. Life in prison is actually less expensive when you take the automatic appeals into account
Mon Dec 10, 2018, 03:55 PM
Dec 2018

It is also possible to correct the error if someone is wrongly convicted

LongtimeAZDem

(4,494 posts)
6. That argument has always bothered me, because the automatic appeals are there to
Mon Dec 10, 2018, 05:27 PM
Dec 2018

make sure it was done right.

But, if we just throw them in jail for life without parole (which is a death sentence, just slower) we can let them rot and not bother with any pesky appeals.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jury deciding sentence fo...