Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservative Magazine The Weekly Standard To Fold After 23 Years (Original Post) edhopper Dec 2018 OP
Should have died over 22 years ago. nt NCjack Dec 2018 #1
Thoughts and Prayers... dlk Dec 2018 #2
From an article posted in TPM lillypaddle Dec 2018 #3
Max Boot & a WaPo opinion piece. irisblue Dec 2018 #4
Indeed. Womp womp. OnDoutside Dec 2018 #6
AMFs! MineralMan Dec 2018 #5
My then new father in law, very conservative, gave me a subscription when it started up. I read it mulsh Dec 2018 #7

lillypaddle

(9,580 posts)
3. From an article posted in TPM
Fri Dec 14, 2018, 03:59 PM
Dec 2018

A different perspective:

The Weekly Standard was part of a tradition of principled political opinion magazines that have been above party and commercial interest. The tradition probably goes back to two publications of the left, The Nation and The New Republic, but it was also followed by William F. Buckley, Jr’s National Review and The Weekly Standard. These publications didn’t follow a party line or slavishly mimic a candidate or president. The New Republic started out as a vehicle for Theodore Roosevelt’s presidential ambitions, but within a year had broken with him. In its first year, The Weekly Standard came out for a Colin Powell presidency. And for the last two years, it has been a leading critic of Republican nominee and President Donald Trump.

Why is this important? Because the role of the political intellectual and journal is to look forward and beyond, not simply to replicate what is. The parties have their spokespeople and their publications. But some publications have to look out for what is best for the national interest rather than that of the Republican or Democratic Party or whatever president is in power. And they have to do so in a responsible and factually-based manner.


More at link. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/standard



irisblue

(32,971 posts)
4. Max Boot & a WaPo opinion piece.
Fri Dec 14, 2018, 04:18 PM
Dec 2018

Source-https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2018/12/14/conservatism-needs-new-weekly-standard-untainted-by-trump/?utm_term=.741090d6f625.


T his qoute jumped out at me. "There’s nothing unusual about a rich owner losing interest in one of his playthings. What makes this case more tragic and infuriating is that Anschutz and McKibben refused entreaties from the Weekly Standard’s editor, Stephen Hayes, to sell the magazine. Rather than allow the magazine to live under new ownership, Anschutz and McKibben murdered it to harvest its subscriber list for the Examiner. So a talented staff of journalists is being thrown out of work just before Christmas in an act that is equal parts destructive, stupid and cruel."


Well Max, that seems to be the essence of conservative, republican social-political behavior. Free hand of the market in the decline of subscriptions and " them that has the gold makes the rules" behavior.

mulsh

(2,959 posts)
7. My then new father in law, very conservative, gave me a subscription when it started up. I read it
Fri Dec 14, 2018, 07:31 PM
Dec 2018

for a few issues. They had better writers than other right wing political journals for a while at least.

The one thing they did really well was the book reviews.

Over the years my father in law has become much more progressive, maybe more so than me. But he's retained the Weekly Standard and whenever I visit I look for it so I can cruise the book reviews.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Conservative Magazine The...