General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWeak finances may be the NRA's undoing, this researcher says
The National Rifle Associations political spending fell during the 2018 midterm elections. Theres talk of ending small perks like free coffee at its offices and even employee layoffs.
These and other trends indicate that at a time when the NRAs clout may seem stronger than ever, its financial power may be faltering.
As a researcher who studies and tracks the finances of nonprofits, I have followed the NRAs financial disclosures for years. Heres what Ive observed lately.
The NRA had negative $31.8 million on hand at the end of 2017, according to the form all nonprofits must file with the IRS. The group, which spent an average of $278.3 million a year, had a negative balance at the end of six of the previous 10 years.
In the 2017 financial statements, Im seeing signs that the problem could be more serious.
....grafts and charts at https://www.marketwatch.com/story/weak-finances-may-be-the-nras-undoing-says-this-researcher-2018-12-15
mickswalkabout41
(145 posts)When a majority of their funds comes from Russian spies it makes the good ole boys a little freaked out. After they tried to hide it, things got much worse. Im a gun owner, and a vet, ex cop too. Ive never wanted to even be a member nor a donor to such an organization.
safeinOhio
(32,715 posts)Serious money will be needed.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)enough
(13,262 posts)UpInArms
(51,284 posts)At the same time, revenue from members dues remained stable, shrinking slightly from $165 million to $163 million. General contributions shot up sharply, however, rising from $96.6 million in 2015 to $127.8 million in 2016 around one-third of the NRAs $378 million in annual revenue. The NRAs nonprofit status exempts it from limits on individual and corporate donations, and it is not required to list who contributed or how much.
RAB910
(3,509 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)uponit7771
(90,364 posts)Historic NY
(37,453 posts)it could drain them dry....
Takket
(21,625 posts)in concert with the drumpf cabal isn't going to help their bottom line either
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)"Thoughts and prayers!"
MineralMan
(146,329 posts)People paid their dues all at once, and now don't have to support the NRA to get whatever benefits they think they're getting from it. It was a concept that raised a lot of money, but once the Lifetime Membership was paid for, people didn't need to send any more money. today, a Lifetime Membership costs $1500, but the NRA often offers discounts for it, and many have bought their Lifetime Memberships for as little as $300.
Now, the NRA's membership has probably reached its saturation point, and new memberships aren't coming in. So, they have to beg for donations, and their members aren't among the wealthy class and aren't donating. They think, "Hey! I paid for my Lifetime Membership. Why should I pay any more than that?"
The NRA has screwed itself with it's own fundraising scheme.
keithbvadu2
(36,906 posts)comment from a blog (I think I got it at DU)
I had a coworker who was a big time gun owner who kept a gun in every room in the house just in case someone broke in (lots of problems with that idea, may be worth a blog article someday, but thats what he did). He even went so far as to start buying more guns for each room after a school shooting, like home invasion and mass shooting are correlated somehow. He had let his NRA membership lapse and refused to renew it because he got tired of nonstop requests for donations. To him all the membership did was give the NRA to badger him for more money with phone calls, and direct mailings. If the
organization is as strapped for cash as it appears, those solicitations may have gone way over the top and people are simply tired of being badgered for money and are choosing to let their membership to lapse.
NickB79
(19,258 posts)There's only so long you can keep telling people the big bad liberals are coming for your guns before it gets old.