General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton
http://mindy-fischer-writer.com/2018/12/cia-confirms-trey-gowdy-altered-documents-to-frame-hillary-clinton/?fbclid=IwAR0U0xxohPPyI8SyCuAr3YJ6W6rWObrysTcyuVWUW4DUwa0ZWyxoW76nNksThrow Gowdy in jail. Throw all of these crooked evil Republicans into jail.
UncleTomsEvilBrother
(945 posts)..., I'm not familiar with this website. The interface drive me insane, and the advertisement button after a paragraph makes me skeptical.
wishstar
(5,272 posts)Over the course of his multiyear, $4.5 million, taxpayer-funded, partisan joyride of a committee, there are few strong-arm tactics Gowdy and his staff have deemed too low for their purposes. They appear to have leaked selective and allegedly incorrect information from closed-door testimony to generate damaging stories in the news. According to Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., the top Democrat on the House Benghazi Committee, they have doctored documents to attempt to incriminate witnesses and Clinton herself. A whistle-blowing, conservative former committee staffer, Bradley Podliska, has accused Gowdy of running a partisan witch hunt.
certainot
(9,090 posts)lying about the clintons and everything else for 30 years while democrats listened to music. those stations were critical to selling the crap that feeds all this. it's the talk radio stupid and "that's what limbaugh said (for putin)" should be a regular retort to anything republican.
wake up dems ! if you want this next phase to turn out right, as opposed to a bunch of forced compromises by dem reps who the same rw buzz will classify as 'spineless' dems and, why vote?
Tumbulu
(6,292 posts)what are you ideas about how to stop the hate am media 30+ year blitz?
Jarqui
(10,131 posts)I'm not sure what the truth is
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,395 posts)iluvtennis
(19,897 posts)HumblePi
(46 posts).... but, as I refer to him as 'Mister Pointy Skull' this actually did happen but i had to confirm it through a more acceptable website and found the article on Huff Post.
[link:https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-benghazi-cia_us_562414f3e4b0bce3470122c5|
POLITICS 10/18/2015 07:59 pm ET Updated Jan 03, 2017
Top Dem Slams Benghazi Committee Chair For False Claim Against Hillary Clinton
WASHINGTON The top Democrat on the committee investigating the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, called out the committees chair on Sunday for advancing a claim against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the CIA later proved false.
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), the chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, alleged in an Oct. 7 letter that Clinton used her private email account to release the name of a CIA source on Libya. An email sent by adviser Sidney Blumenthal that she then forwarded to a member of her staff reportedly contained the name of that source, which would have suggested that Clinton used her private email server to disseminate classified information.
But on Sunday, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the committees ranking member, revealed that the CIA investigated the email and found that the information was not classified.
The CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information, Cummings said in a letter to Gowdy.
He called Gowdys claim irresponsible and said he owes Clinton an immediate apology.
Hillary Clinton may still be waiting for Trey Gowdy's apology.
pecosbob
(7,547 posts)that made the redactions and then goes on to use the pronoun "'we' will continue to redact certain information..."
https://benghazi.house.gov/sites/republicans.benghazi.house.gov/files/Gowdy%20to%20EEC%2010.18.15.pdf
SayItLoud
(1,702 posts)probing what's been written in the article?
pecosbob
(7,547 posts)Neither do I believe it was his idea to make the redactions.
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)ANYTHING they released could not have been released WITHOUT his review and sign off, that makes HIM credible for anything released by the committee.
As far as the legality, having worked with Congressional committees and sub-committees, I can tell you that there are Congressional statutes regarding ETHICS which blow his behavior out of the water.
pecosbob
(7,547 posts)and I have no doubt that he was fully aware of the alterations...I simply meant to indicate that the instruction to make the redactions and misrepresent their origin may have come from the WH.