General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans squash bill to pay for Vietnam vets' health care ... say they're worried about deficit
In June, the House voted 382-0 to pass the Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act, which would extend veterans benefits to the numerous men who served off the coast of Vietnam during the war. Many of these men have had to spend a considerable part of their lives trying to prove that they were exposed to Agent Orange, leading to some, if not most, of their health problems. Since June, the act has been stuck in the Republican-led Senate. Last Monday, Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) attempted to get the unanimous consent of the Senate to pass the bill.
If the Senate can get unanimous consent on a bill, it can move through approval considerably quicker, and this bill is a seeming no-brainer for Democrats and Republicans. There are no poison pills attached to the act, no secret money for food assistance (giving to people who need it money for food is something that can really scare off Republican legislators). The only drawback to asking for a unanimous approval on the Senate floor is that the moment a single senator opposes the bill, the entire unanimous consent enterprise is scuttled. Of course, who would object to extending healthcare benefits to Vietnam veterans? Like, for real? Who? According to the Stars and Stripes, that would be Senator Mike Enzi (WY-R), chairman of the Senate Budget Committee.
On this bill, many of us have been made aware of the potential cost growth and the budgetary and operational pressures that would happen at the VA, he said. Theyre having a lot of problems, anyway.
He seems to be referring to the problems Trumps VA has had doing anything right. Of course, Enzi also voted for the deficit-exploding Republican tax cuts for the wealthy.
-more-
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/12/17/1819749/-Republicans-squash-bill-to-pay-for-Vietnam-veterans-healthcare-say-they-re-worried-about-deficit?utm_campaign=recent
Bluepinky
(2,268 posts)They cost too much, and frankly, hes not worth it.
democrank
(11,094 posts)Mike Enzis potential cost growth worries make me want to vomit, especially since he voted for tax cuts for the rich.
Were not giving veterans anything. They earned whatever they get.
pansypoo53219
(20,976 posts)the rich before fodder.
akraven
(1,975 posts)to the devil with anyone else.
Disabled vet chiming in.
Vinca
(50,270 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,343 posts)Republicans vote for tax cuts as kickbacks to their rich campaign donors. Voting to save veterans' lives? They need to calculate the number of votes that will buy them come election day. It's just business, don't you see. Gotta have that ROI.