General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet's take a breath about the Whitaker "no recusal" opinion
Whitaker has been overseeing the investigation for the past month and it's been going gangbusters. It doesn't seem, at least so far, that he has been meddling or quashing it. In fact, he's been letting Mueller move forward just as before
Of course, that could always change, but at this point, I'm taking a wait and see attitude.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,692 posts)and wants to stay as far away from the undertow as possible when the whole thing goes down. He doesn't strike me as the sharpest knife in the drawer but he probably understands what an obstruction of justice charge would look like on his resume. His career is toast anyhow, just on account of having agreed to take the job under these circumstances.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)are much further down the road to tRumps removal than they were on the day that Sessions resigned. Even if Whitaker wanted to blow up the Mueller investigation he has only two weeks left to do so before Ds take over the House. Doubtful anything will happen on that front. And he can do nothing about the state-level investigations that are popping up all over the place.
Chakaconcarne
(2,451 posts)is up to? cant imagine he could get away with it, but who knows.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)But life is a lot harder now with Congressional oversight. They can easily haul him up to the Hill, put him under oath and ask him if he leaked to Trump. He can try to claim executive privilege, but if he's obstructing justice, there is no privilege. And while he can still refuse to testify, he'll be looking at a contempt charge from the newly non-lapdog Congress.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,692 posts)And the new appointee, Barr, is in for some interesting questions, too.