The "Are You Better Off" Election Meme Needs to Die
from Washington Monthly, via AlterNet:
In 1980, Ronald Reagan made a famous statement in a presidential debate inviting voters to make up their minds by sticking a big hatpin through their frontal lobes and assessing whether they were better off than they were when Jimmy Carter became president four years earlier. Ronald Reagan won that election.
To a remarkable number of gabbers, that seems to prove that if a majority of voters now conclude they are not better off than they were when Barack Obama became president four years ago, Mitt Romney should win, and it will be deeply weird if he doesnt.
That is the clear implication of Susan Pages USAToday story on the latest USAT/Gallup survey, which expresses great puzzlement that Obamas still ahead in national polls insofar as Americans say they are not better off by a 55/42 margin. True, concedes Page, this is a question that pollsters have only asked episodically in the past (which makes you wonder why its so incredibly important), but still, didnt Reagan beat Carter?
I have never understood the apparent belief of so many people that Reagan, in making (albeit with nice simplicity) the case that every challenger makes to every incumbent in all but boom times, somehow magically produced victory, as though voters said to themselves: Wow, am I better off? Never thought of that one before! Obviously if voters overall make a negative judgment on an incumbent and a positive judgment on a challenger, the challenger will win. Its how they make these judgments, and how you balance the referendum and two choices factors, and how they interact with less discretionary candidate attachments like partisanship and turnout, that are the real questions. ...................(more)
The complete piece is at:
http://www.alternet.org/hot-news-views/are-you-better-election-meme-needs-die