General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHoward Schultz built a driveway through a park: This is why he shouldn't be president
The Starbucks CEO's 1994 battle over a Seattle park is a classic story about America's billionaire classAMANDA MARCOTTE JANUARY 31, 2019 6:30PM (UTC)
Consider the way Schultz speaks about politicians who want to ameliorate economic inequality through progressive taxation: He has said they are "ridiculous," "misinformed" and even "un-American" for wishing to return to the tax rates of the mid-20th century.
Schultz appears to be using the threat of a spoiler campaign in order to intimidate Democrats out of even talking about higher taxes on the rich.
But one story out of Seattle from the early 1990s regarding a public park and a private driveway perfectly illustrates the toxic brew of entitlement, contempt for the commons and overblown self-regard that is fueling Schultz's presidential flirtation.
"Quite a few of Howard Schultz's neighbors say the Parks Department never should have let him build a 100-foot driveway through the park next to his new home overlooking Lake Washington, near Denny Blaine Park," begins a Jan. 3, 1994, Seattle Times article written by Dick Lilly.
Schultz had purchased a parcel of private property on a Seattle hilltop that already had a driveway running through Viretta Park, but that wasn't enough. The coffee magnate wanted more than the existing "overgrown lane," so he got city permission to build a new driveway and even convinced Seattle authorities to waive the $25,000 fee they charged for using the park as a staging area during driveway construction.
Schultz's behavior towards Seattle illustrates the attitude that is also fueling his presidential ambitions: A belief that everyone else should kowtow to the billionaires, and that they owe nothing to their communities.
This is also clearly reflected in Schultz's meager charitable giving, which amounts to less than 0.5 percent of his $3.4 billion fortune. It's reflected in Schultz's history of union-busting at Starbucks and his support of a lobbying campaign against raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour.
https://www.salon.com/2019/01/31/what-howard-schultzs-driveway-debacle-says-about-him-america-and-the-billionaire-class/
mokawanis
(4,453 posts)I really wish he'd just go away and stay out of politics forever.
dalton99a
(81,648 posts)"Lifelong" Democrat, my ass
Iggo
(47,579 posts)So...yeah.
JHB
(37,163 posts)...but that term fit this guy to a "T". Thankfully, he's been so kind as to exit the Big Tent.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Who the hell is Mr Anti-Union/Moneybags trying to fool anyway?
Democrats ain't buyin his HS!
oasis
(49,431 posts)Whiskeytide
(4,463 posts)... pretending to be sort of to the left of center for years as part of his marketing image. Liberals buy a lot of coffee. Thats why hes the perfect person for the republicans to throw into the race as an independent to try and siphon votes from the democratic candidate. Its all just theatre.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)My adult relatives up home in Seattle have pretty much been supporting the local coffee houses and bookstores that Seattle is so famous for. the ones that are still surviving, anyhow.
Whiskeytide
(4,463 posts)... but I have always thought Starbucks started in Seattle as a local shop, and was expanded in the late 80s or early 90s with the concept of retaining the image of a progressive establishment - kind of an avant garde thing.
But here in the South during that time everything that wasnt a meat and three operation was kind of avant garde - so maybe my perception is skewed. It just always felt like a liberal hangout to me. 🤣
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)It was a coffee bean shop, for years, became more popular when it moved into the Pike Place Market, after 1976.
I was living/working in Seattle during the 70's, there were a lot of local coffee shops around, esp. in the University District.
Schultz bought it in 1987, then expanded the stores.
Seattle was always a blue collar town, even during the 1980's......I miss the way it was. I moved down South in 1987 and have not been back except for a couple visits.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)catbyte
(34,489 posts)Stingy, arrogant, greedy entitlement is right up their alley.
Salviati
(6,009 posts)The fewer reasons there are for republican voters who don't like trump to vote, the better.
In the end, no one who wants to vote for trump can be convinced to vote for anyone else, and after another two years of this, I can't see anyone holding their nose to vote for him.
Kingofalldems
(38,497 posts)Iggo
(47,579 posts)Both my girls work/worked at Starbucks, and I'm ready to listen.
Me.
(35,454 posts)dlk
(11,585 posts)Nor is it a place for someone with no previous governmental experience. Seriously, would Schultz hire a senior-level executive for Starbucks with no prior experience? Running the country is infinitely more complicated than running a corporation and requires a much different skill set. This obnoxious level of entitlement from billionaires is beyond tiresome!
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)has always been bullshit, but is hard to kill. Being an effective politician who take in all the concerns of a diverse society and comes up with sound policy reguires a skillset that the vast majority of successful business people don't have.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)he would draw a lot more republican votes than democratic votes.. or as he might say -'democrat votes.'
He doesn;t seem to like us one iota,,,
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)If an article has the facts on its side, there's no need to juice it. The article says, "Consider the way Schultz speaks about politicians who want to ameliorate economic inequality through progressive taxation: He has said they are "ridiculous," "misinformed" and even "un-American" for wishing to return to the tax rates of the mid-20th century." That's not quite correct. He said Elizabeth Warren's proposed wealth tax was ridiculous; that is not a return to tax rates of the mid-20th century. I didn't hear him say "misinformed" or "unAmerican," but if he did, maybe the article is wrong about what it says he was referring to, like the "ridiculous" comment he made.
Having played Devil's Advocate above, the rest of the article is very telling and very worrying. It's the sort of thing Trump would do.
Why do people keep saying this guy is a Democrat? I see nothing Democratic about him.
MarvinGardens
(779 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)FakeNoose
(32,833 posts)Move along folks, nothing to see here.
Hekate
(90,882 posts)Gothmog
(145,695 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
nocoincidences
(2,234 posts)how some people like Trump and this guy can be so isolated from the real everyday life of most people.
Do they have a million servants who go to the grocery store? Don't they ever have to sit in a Dentist's office dreading/waiting for an appt.?
Would they know how to write a check?
Deposit a check in the drive-thru lane?
Would they have a clue when rush hour traffic happened, or how to drive in it?
They weren't born surrounded by servants, at least Schultz wasn't.
Doesn't he remember what it is like to be a real person?