Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe joint chiefs haven't looked happy a single time the camera focused on them.
ESpecially when he talked about Syria.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 769 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The joint chiefs haven't looked happy a single time the camera focused on them. (Original Post)
Amaryllis
Feb 2019
OP
spanone
(135,831 posts)1. They're listening to a lunatic who has the nuclear codes at his disposal
Last edited Wed Feb 6, 2019, 12:00 AM - Edit history (1)
The Generals should have stood up and walked out when he presented asylum seekers as a threat to USA
mucifer
(23,542 posts)2. They always look like that in SOTU speeches
The Blue Flower
(5,442 posts)3. Their CIC is a traitor
How happy can they be?
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)4. My point exactly.
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)5. They look like disjointed chiefs
TomSlick
(11,098 posts)6. The Joint Chiefs and SCOTUS Justices are obliged to sit there stone faced.
They ought not appear political.