Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pecosbob

(7,534 posts)
Tue Feb 12, 2019, 12:59 AM Feb 2019

The One Thing All the 2020 Democratic Candidates Agree They Hate

Rejecting money from corporate PACs has become an early litmus test

The field of Democratic candidates running for president in 2020 is still taking shape, but so far the contenders have agreed on one policy: Cash from corporate political action committees (PACs) is bad. That’s not an entirely new idea—in 2008 and 2012 Barack Obama rejected donations from corporate PACs, though Hillary Clinton didn’t repeat that pledge in 2016—but it’s quickly becoming an early litmus test for presidential contenders when it comes to campaign finance.


To date, Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Kirstin Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), as well as Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and former San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro, have all vowed not to take corporate PAC dollars for their 2020 campaigns, attempting to portray their independence from corporate influence. “I don’t believe democracy should be for sale to billionaires and giant corporations,” Warren said during a campaign event last month.


I for one view this as a positive step.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/02/2020-democrats-corporate-pacs-campaign-finance-warren-gillibrand-booker-harris/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The One Thing All the 2020 Democratic Candidates Agree They Hate (Original Post) pecosbob Feb 2019 OP
Yup... and thank you Bernie for leading the charge once again!! InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2019 #1
This is mostly just empty symbolism of no consequence kennetha Feb 2019 #2
Doesn't mean what people think it does, but it's a nice, empty symbol to rally behind Recursion Feb 2019 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The One Thing All the 202...