General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Clarence Thomas calls for reconsideration of landmark libel case
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Tuesday called for reconsideration of a landmark First Amendment precedent, criticizing the 1964 decision that the Constitution creates a higher barrier for public figures to claim libel.
Thomas wrote alongside a court decision not to take up the case of a woman who accused Bill Cosby of sexual misconduct in 2014. He suggested that the seminal case New York Times v. Sullivan, holding that public figures have a higher burden to prove libel, was wrongly decided.
"New York Times and the Court's decisions extending it were policy-driven decisions masquerading as constitutional law," Thomas wrote.
"If the Constitution does not require public figures to satisfy an actual-malice standard in state-law defamation suits, then neither should we," the opinion states.
He continued, saying "We did not begin meddling in this area until 1964, nearly 175 years after the First Amendment was ratified. The States are perfectly capable of striking an acceptable balance between encouraging robust public discourse and providing a meaningful remedy for reputational harm. We should reconsider our jurisprudence in this area."
His position echoes complaints of President Donald Trump, who has called for libel laws to be reconsidered in light of news stories about him, said CNN Supreme Court analyst and University of Texas School of Law professor Steve Vladeck.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/justice-clarence-thomas-calls-for-reconsideration-of-landmark-libel-case/ar-BBTOreO?li=BBnb7Kz
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)"Therefore, any defamatory statement you make about me - even if it's 100% true - are actionable, and I will ruin your life for taking a shot at me."
Welcome to the Clarence Thomas Doctrine of the inviolability of powerful men.
Me.
(35,454 posts)and if I'm going to be forced off the court earlier than I wanted we'll need more cash
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)"Constitutional Law for Dumbasses"
msongs
(67,476 posts)EleanorR
(2,396 posts)Cicada
(4,533 posts)The Birchers would pay, those saying Hillary is a pedophile would lose, Trump would owe zillions, Fox News would close.