General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOp-Ed: Bernie Sanders' 2020 presidential campaign will face the scrutiny Clinton got in 2016
NBC NewsThe ultimate problem that Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., faces right now, after announcing his intention to again seek the Democratic Party's nomination for president, is that Democratic voters arent fully aware of his record yet.
That may seem counterintuitive after the rough 2016 primary and his supporters' blanketing of social media. But, in truth, the 2016 Clinton campaign never named him in a single negative television or digital ad. And the media never truly educated the primary voting public with the intensity reserved for candidates seen as viable: His underdog status protected him then, but he wont have that this time around.
There were, of course, numerous news stories that covered Sanders positions throughout the campaign, in between the obsessive coverage detailing the gritty ins and outs of the latest in the Clinton email scandal. A study from Harvard's Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy suggests as much: Only seven percent of his coverage was about his policies, but 83 percent of that was positive, whereas 28 percent of Clinton's coverage was policy-based and 84 percent of that was negative.
"Journalists," the study said "made more references to her past history than they did to those of other candidates and focused on the negative."
OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,326 posts)They didnt need to push it. David Brock (former rat fucking partner of Ann Coulter) was all over media with their other surrogates pushing that bull shit.
For instance, the he didnt support marriage equality because he said states should be deciding is absolute bull shit. This was a time when states were granting marriage rights and the feds were trying to put a stop to it. He was correct. DOMA was unconstitutional and states granting equality along with reciprocal rights should have ruled the day.
betsuni
(25,486 posts)Cha
(297,196 posts)lol
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Polybius
(15,398 posts)I'm not bitter at Bernie, but he could have addressed his followers more.
Response to Polybius (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Cha
(297,196 posts)brooklynite
(94,520 posts)The claim is that Sanders never went through the rigorous vetting that he's likely to if he becomes a frontrunner.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Cha
(297,196 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)She won the popular vote.
Do you not know this?
radius777
(3,635 posts)and Hillary being a woman caused a white populist backlash that gave us Trump and (to a lesser extent) the Sanders movement as well.
It is clear that IRL and online, that there is significant ideological crossover between the alt-right and alt-left (note I don't include regular Dems who supported Sanders but then voted for Hillary in the GE in this description, but the hardcore Bernie and Sarandon types who hate the Dem party and are sympathetic to Trump).
Yosemito
(648 posts)They won't be nice to any real Democrat.
QC
(26,371 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)And I want him to explain his dismissive attitude towards women and people of color.
I'm sure we'll just hear more about the "establishment" and "corporate Democrats." It's his only speech.
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Anyway, he still won't face the same level of scrutiny because he hasn't had a target on his back for 25 years the way Clinton had.
And I don't think Sanders will be around past Super Tuesday.
dsc
(52,160 posts)He will get more scrutiny than he got, it would be fairly hard not to, but no way no how will he get treated like she did. No one will get treated like she did (except maybe Warren).