Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 02:13 PM Feb 2019

Op-Ed: Bernie Sanders' 2020 presidential campaign will face the scrutiny Clinton got in 2016

NBC News

The ultimate problem that Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., faces right now, after announcing his intention to again seek the Democratic Party's nomination for president, is that Democratic voters aren’t fully aware of his record — yet.

That may seem counterintuitive after the rough 2016 primary and his supporters' blanketing of social media. But, in truth, the 2016 Clinton campaign never named him in a single negative television or digital ad. And the media never truly educated the primary voting public with the intensity reserved for candidates seen as viable: His underdog status protected him then, but he won’t have that this time around.

There were, of course, numerous news stories that covered Sanders’ positions throughout the campaign, in between the obsessive coverage detailing the gritty ins and outs of the latest in the Clinton email scandal. A study from Harvard's Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy suggests as much: Only seven percent of his coverage was about his policies, but 83 percent of that was positive, whereas 28 percent of Clinton's coverage was policy-based and 84 percent of that was negative.

"Journalists," the study said "made more references to her past history than they did to those of other candidates and focused on the negative."

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Op-Ed: Bernie Sanders' 2020 presidential campaign will face the scrutiny Clinton got in 2016 (Original Post) brooklynite Feb 2019 OP
I can't wait to see his 2016 tax returns ! OnDoutside Feb 2019 #1
Lol. We've never heard ANY of that! Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2019 #2
DAVID BROCK!!!!1111 betsuni Feb 2019 #17
David Brock!!!! Cha Feb 2019 #18
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2019 #3
Bernie didn't exactly give a warm endorsement though Polybius Feb 2019 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2019 #7
Noo he did not lunamagica Feb 2019 #14
Wrong Again. Cha Feb 2019 #20
That's not the point of the story... brooklynite Feb 2019 #10
That's not what the OP is about. Not even close. Garrett78 Feb 2019 #11
No, you don't know what you're talking about. Cha Feb 2019 #19
She didn't lose. ehrnst Feb 2019 #22
Obama being a black man radius777 Feb 2019 #23
Wrong. The media hate Biden, not Bernie Yosemito Feb 2019 #5
"By Zac Petkanas...former senior aide to Hillary Clinton" n/t QC Feb 2019 #6
So? Cha Feb 2019 #21
I wanna see the tax returns. 10 years of them. Adrahil Feb 2019 #8
... lapucelle Feb 2019 #9
That's much more reality-based than the claims that the media helped Clinton and hurt Sanders. Garrett78 Feb 2019 #12
No he won't dsc Feb 2019 #13
Unfortunately you are right lunamagica Feb 2019 #15
Unfortunately you are right lunamagica Feb 2019 #16
You're right, of course. Cha Feb 2019 #24

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,326 posts)
2. Lol. We've never heard ANY of that!
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 02:29 PM
Feb 2019


They didn’t need to push it. David Brock (former rat fucking partner of Ann Coulter) was all over media with their other surrogates pushing that bull shit.



For instance, the “he didn’t support marriage equality because he said states should be deciding” is absolute bull shit. This was a time when states were granting marriage rights and the feds were trying to put a stop to it. He was correct. DOMA was unconstitutional and states granting equality along with reciprocal rights should have ruled the day.

Response to brooklynite (Original post)

Polybius

(15,398 posts)
4. Bernie didn't exactly give a warm endorsement though
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 02:40 PM
Feb 2019

I'm not bitter at Bernie, but he could have addressed his followers more.

Response to Polybius (Reply #4)

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)
10. That's not the point of the story...
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 04:16 PM
Feb 2019

The claim is that Sanders never went through the rigorous vetting that he's likely to if he becomes a frontrunner.

radius777

(3,635 posts)
23. Obama being a black man
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 08:22 PM
Feb 2019

and Hillary being a woman caused a white populist backlash that gave us Trump and (to a lesser extent) the Sanders movement as well.

It is clear that IRL and online, that there is significant ideological crossover between the alt-right and alt-left (note I don't include regular Dems who supported Sanders but then voted for Hillary in the GE in this description, but the hardcore Bernie and Sarandon types who hate the Dem party and are sympathetic to Trump).

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
8. I wanna see the tax returns. 10 years of them.
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 03:28 PM
Feb 2019

And I want him to explain his dismissive attitude towards women and people of color.

I'm sure we'll just hear more about the "establishment" and "corporate Democrats." It's his only speech.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
12. That's much more reality-based than the claims that the media helped Clinton and hurt Sanders.
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 04:23 PM
Feb 2019

Anyway, he still won't face the same level of scrutiny because he hasn't had a target on his back for 25 years the way Clinton had.

And I don't think Sanders will be around past Super Tuesday.

dsc

(52,160 posts)
13. No he won't
Wed Feb 20, 2019, 04:24 PM
Feb 2019

He will get more scrutiny than he got, it would be fairly hard not to, but no way no how will he get treated like she did. No one will get treated like she did (except maybe Warren).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Op-Ed: Bernie Sanders' 20...