Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Recursion

(56,582 posts) Wed Feb 27, 2019, 02:05 PM Feb 2019

2

Did I hear that right? "Not all of them were women"?

I go to the kitchen for a damn second...

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did I hear that right? "Not all of them were women"? (Original Post) Recursion Feb 2019 OP

yes, but it seemed to be to say that some of the funny business did not involve affairs nt spooky3 Feb 2019 #1

Oh, OK, that makes sense Recursion Feb 2019 #3

Yes, but I think he meant matters other than infidelity. marylandblue Feb 2019 #2

I'm sure the Don has had to make hush payments for all kinds of things (nt) Recursion Feb 2019 #4

Yes. I took it to mean he had to pay off people for non-sexual indiscretions Trump committed. Maru Kitteh Feb 2019 #5

Makes sense (nt) Recursion Feb 2019 #6

Yup and they said Pecker is cooperating too, so... marylandblue Feb 2019 #7

Pecker apparently literally has a safe Recursion Feb 2019 #9

CBS, with Video @ Twitter link OneBlueDotBama Feb 2019 #8

spooky3

(34,452 posts)

1. yes, but it seemed to be to say that some of the funny business did not involve affairs nt

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2019, 02:06 PM

Feb 2019

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

3. Oh, OK, that makes sense

Reply to spooky3 (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 27, 2019, 02:07 PM

Feb 2019

Other kinds of payoffs, then.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)

2. Yes, but I think he meant matters other than infidelity.

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2019, 02:06 PM

Feb 2019

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

4. I'm sure the Don has had to make hush payments for all kinds of things (nt)

Reply to marylandblue (Reply #2)

Wed Feb 27, 2019, 02:07 PM

Feb 2019

Maru Kitteh

(28,340 posts)

5. Yes. I took it to mean he had to pay off people for non-sexual indiscretions Trump committed.

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2019, 02:07 PM

Feb 2019

Who knows what those could be. Sky's the limit there.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

6. Makes sense (nt)

Reply to Maru Kitteh (Reply #5)

Wed Feb 27, 2019, 02:08 PM

Feb 2019

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)

7. Yup and they said Pecker is cooperating too, so...

Reply to Maru Kitteh (Reply #5)

Wed Feb 27, 2019, 02:08 PM

Feb 2019

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

9. Pecker apparently literally has a safe

Reply to marylandblue (Reply #7)

Wed Feb 27, 2019, 03:12 PM

Feb 2019

Full of stories that Donald Trump has wanted killed.

OneBlueDotBama

(1,384 posts)

8. CBS, with Video @ Twitter link

Reply to Recursion (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2019, 02:20 PM

Feb 2019

CBS Evening News
‏Verified account @CBSEveningNews

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD): "David Pecker had done ['catch and kill'] in other cases of other mistresses or women?"
Michael Cohen: "Other circumstances, yes. Not all of them had to do with women." https://cbsn.ws/2BXsNPs

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did I hear that right? "N...