Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 03:22 PM Mar 2019

Do you think Mueller and Barr have discussed the indictment of a President?

Justice Department rules prohibit the President from being indicted. But it is only a rule, it is not a law.

Is it possible Mueller and Barr have discussed the indictment of Donald J Trump?

If they have not, both will have been very irresponsible and neglectful of the rule of law, in my opinion.

The ability of Republicans to rationalize everything that Trump does as "not illegal" is mind-boggling. They don't say that it is "legal", they say that it is "not illegal".

Somewhere deep within their chasm of denial, there must exist a small tinge of consciousness that whispers for them to do the right thing?

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do you think Mueller and Barr have discussed the indictment of a President? (Original Post) kentuck Mar 2019 OP
I suspect Mueller has discussed indictment - very, very carefully. empedocles Mar 2019 #1
It's not even a rule, it's a legal opinion, the AG is not bound by it. marylandblue Mar 2019 #2
At the very end, (if they did discuss it) would we ever know? bluestarone Mar 2019 #5
If they don't indict him, they will both say they can't discuss it marylandblue Mar 2019 #6
TY bluestarone Mar 2019 #7
Sorry, one more thought here. bluestarone Mar 2019 #10
I think the rules say he can't, but there is a Watergate precedent marylandblue Mar 2019 #11
WOW huh? bluestarone Mar 2019 #14
I don't know what you mean by "nothing changes." marylandblue Mar 2019 #16
Sorry. by my comment (nothing changes), i mean that Mueller STILL bluestarone Mar 2019 #17
I don't know the answer, Congress is entitled to a lot of information marylandblue Mar 2019 #18
Well now TY for that bluestarone Mar 2019 #19
Mueller and Barr have been friends for 30 years. watoos Mar 2019 #3
I do not trust Barr. Iliyah Mar 2019 #4
Same. rockfordfile Mar 2019 #8
I suspect Barr is a Trojan Horse randr Mar 2019 #9
For who? Rosenstein recommended him. marylandblue Mar 2019 #12
no onenote Mar 2019 #13
I don't trust Barr or any other Republican but I try to be an optimist Power 2 the People Mar 2019 #15

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
2. It's not even a rule, it's a legal opinion, the AG is not bound by it.
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 03:31 PM
Mar 2019

I don't.think they will discuss it unless and until Mueller wants to indict the President, which will be at the very end.

bluestarone

(16,940 posts)
5. At the very end, (if they did discuss it) would we ever know?
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 03:42 PM
Mar 2019

Would Mueller testify in the House, if it was discussed? I'm thinking, if he (Mueller) was asked under oath, this would come out.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
6. If they don't indict him, they will both say they can't discuss it
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 03:44 PM
Mar 2019

Because of rules that say the DOJ doesn't discuss cases where no charges are filed.

bluestarone

(16,940 posts)
10. Sorry, one more thought here.
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 03:58 PM
Mar 2019

Let's say Mueller really really really wants to indict RUMP. Now Barr says NO, THEN Mueller STILL cannot testify in the House if asked too?

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
11. I think the rules say he can't, but there is a Watergate precedent
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 04:25 PM
Mar 2019

The grand jury wanted to indict Nixon but Jaworski refused. So the grand jury sent a report to the judge to send to Congress. DOJ rules are ambiguous as to whether a grand jury can actually issue it's own report, but I don't see how DOJ could stop a grand jury from petitioning a judge.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
16. I don't know what you mean by "nothing changes."
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 04:56 PM
Mar 2019

I am not sure how this works out really. I think we are in a slow motion constitutional crisis. There is no clear answer to what happens if a President just openly flouts the law while Congress does nothing.

bluestarone

(16,940 posts)
17. Sorry. by my comment (nothing changes), i mean that Mueller STILL
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 05:02 PM
Mar 2019

Could not say that he himself really really wanted to indict BUT Barr refused, if subpoenaed by the house.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
18. I don't know the answer, Congress is entitled to a lot of information
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 05:37 PM
Mar 2019

Might have to be in closed session though.

Now that I think about it, since the House has the power to impeach, they should have the implied power to get any information from the Executive branch that has bearing on the President's conduct. That would mean they get Mueller's report, which will list the decisions made to indict or not indict people.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
3. Mueller and Barr have been friends for 30 years.
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 03:37 PM
Mar 2019

Just rumors now, but they are out there that Barr will work with Mueller.

Power 2 the People

(2,437 posts)
15. I don't trust Barr or any other Republican but I try to be an optimist
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 04:47 PM
Mar 2019

Barr has been friends with Mueller for 30 years and respects him immensely. Mueller attended the weddings of two of Barr's daughters, and their wives attend Bible study together.

Barr was AG for George H.W. Bush and was strongly recommended by W. He donated to Jeb Bush's Presidential campaign in 2016.The Bush family despises Trump and H.W. even admitted to voting for Hillary Clinton over Trump. What better way to destroy Trump from the inside,than to put in a Bush loyalist at DOJ?

Could he be a Trojan horse who took advantage of Trump's stupidity and his staff's inexperience to get in a position of power to take down Agent Orange? It's a long shot but it's possible.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you think Mueller and ...