General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you think Mueller and Barr have discussed the indictment of a President?
Justice Department rules prohibit the President from being indicted. But it is only a rule, it is not a law.
Is it possible Mueller and Barr have discussed the indictment of Donald J Trump?
If they have not, both will have been very irresponsible and neglectful of the rule of law, in my opinion.
The ability of Republicans to rationalize everything that Trump does as "not illegal" is mind-boggling. They don't say that it is "legal", they say that it is "not illegal".
Somewhere deep within their chasm of denial, there must exist a small tinge of consciousness that whispers for them to do the right thing?
empedocles
(15,751 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)I don't.think they will discuss it unless and until Mueller wants to indict the President, which will be at the very end.
bluestarone
(16,940 posts)Would Mueller testify in the House, if it was discussed? I'm thinking, if he (Mueller) was asked under oath, this would come out.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Because of rules that say the DOJ doesn't discuss cases where no charges are filed.
bluestarone
(16,940 posts)bluestarone
(16,940 posts)Let's say Mueller really really really wants to indict RUMP. Now Barr says NO, THEN Mueller STILL cannot testify in the House if asked too?
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)The grand jury wanted to indict Nixon but Jaworski refused. So the grand jury sent a report to the judge to send to Congress. DOJ rules are ambiguous as to whether a grand jury can actually issue it's own report, but I don't see how DOJ could stop a grand jury from petitioning a judge.
bluestarone
(16,940 posts)I'm assuming that nothing changes even If He's (Mueller) Subpoenaed right? TY again.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)I am not sure how this works out really. I think we are in a slow motion constitutional crisis. There is no clear answer to what happens if a President just openly flouts the law while Congress does nothing.
bluestarone
(16,940 posts)Could not say that he himself really really wanted to indict BUT Barr refused, if subpoenaed by the house.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Might have to be in closed session though.
Now that I think about it, since the House has the power to impeach, they should have the implied power to get any information from the Executive branch that has bearing on the President's conduct. That would mean they get Mueller's report, which will list the decisions made to indict or not indict people.
bluestarone
(16,940 posts)New hope here!!!
watoos
(7,142 posts)Just rumors now, but they are out there that Barr will work with Mueller.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)randr
(12,412 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Maybe it's Rosenstein's way of getting justice served.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Barr has been friends with Mueller for 30 years and respects him immensely. Mueller attended the weddings of two of Barr's daughters, and their wives attend Bible study together.
Barr was AG for George H.W. Bush and was strongly recommended by W. He donated to Jeb Bush's Presidential campaign in 2016.The Bush family despises Trump and H.W. even admitted to voting for Hillary Clinton over Trump. What better way to destroy Trump from the inside,than to put in a Bush loyalist at DOJ?
Could he be a Trojan horse who took advantage of Trump's stupidity and his staff's inexperience to get in a position of power to take down Agent Orange? It's a long shot but it's possible.