Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,089 posts)
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 05:48 PM Mar 2019

What Mueller should do?

This is just my opinion.

But I think he should indict Trump for his part in the campaign finance violation, for which Cohen has already been convicted. Cohen had the checks. One of them was signed by Don Jr and Allen Weisselberg, the COO of the Trump Organization.

He doesn't have to wait until there are two crimes committed before he can indict. He can indict on one charge if the law permits. And the law does permit.

Everyone has known since Day One that Donald Trump was in violation of the Emolument clause of the Constitution.

There are also minor charges of tax fraud and bank fraud.

And the Congress cannot forget the possible charges of conspiracy against the United States Government, and do their part, to further impeach the President of the United States, should the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, decide to indict Donald J Trump.

Just my opinion.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Quemado

(1,262 posts)
1. Agreed - go against DOJ policy and indict
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 05:54 PM
Mar 2019

45 on the campaign finance violation as a minimum; more charges if possible.

rzemanfl

(29,557 posts)
3. The whole rationale of not indicting a sitting President is based on
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 06:02 PM
Mar 2019

an honest election, not a stolen one. Eff him and his horse.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
5. I don't think there is any rationale not to indict a sitting President
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 06:19 PM
Mar 2019

Only two types of people in world history have been beyond the power of criminal courts - kings and dictators. Since the Constitution did not create either office, DOJ has no power to do so. Neither can Congress create a dictator by dereliction of duty.

rzemanfl

(29,557 posts)
7. The idea had its genesis with getting Agnew out of the line of succession.
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 08:10 PM
Mar 2019

Unfortunately that opinion was lauded by a lengthy DOJ opinion at the time of the Lewinsky affair. I agree with you, but the DOJ might not.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
8. You are right, DOJ might not agree, but there are ways to bypass DOJ
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 09:39 PM
Mar 2019

and get the issue to a judge, where hopefully the rule of law will prevail.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Mueller should do?