General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStone's getting called to the carpet
Darren Samuelsohn @dsamuelsohn 2m2 minutes agoNEW: Judge Jackson scolds Roger Stone in a new order over his latest book intro ripping Mueller and demands a March 11 status report "detailing his efforts to come into compliance with the court's rulings" on the gag order.
Court docs here: http://ow.ly/I3HT30nVSjk
...thread:
Link to tweet
malaise
(269,123 posts)scumbag
Get thee to the greatest page NOW
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,189 posts)Let him die in prison.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)True Dough
(17,313 posts)This simpleton has pushed his luck too far for quite a while.
maveric
(16,445 posts)empedocles
(15,751 posts)Stone is a bad case for trump to test the trump pardon power credibility/viability.
Response to bigtree (Original post)
blaze This message was self-deleted by its author.
peggysue2
(10,836 posts)He clearly doesn't deserve them. He has no respect for the law or this judge's repeating orders.
Hope she finally throws him into a cell!
triron
(22,009 posts)blaze
(6,367 posts)snip
Defendant must produce any records, including the December 17, 2018 agreement
referenced in the Declaration of Anthony Lyons [Dkt. # 55-1] ¶ 4, and any other
contracts, letters, emails or other communications with the publisher, detailing the
terms and schedule for the release of the new edition of the book with the January
2019 Introduction, including all records reflecting when retailers could begin
offering the book for sale and records reflecting the date when the book would be
first offered for sale by online vendors such as amazon.com and Google Books.
Defendant must inform the Court of the exact date the book was first made available
for purchase online, and the Introduction was made available for viewing, at
amazon.com and Google Books or any other online vendor.
Defendant must inform the Court whether and when he became aware of: the fact
that the new edition of the book had been printed by the publisher; the fact that
copies of the book had been shipped from the printer; the fact that copies were
available at bookstores; the fact that retail bookstores were selling the book; and
the fact that the book was available for purchase or viewing online.
Defendant must specify the date and content of any Instagram or social media posts,
including deleted posts, or other public statements he made from January 15 to the
present concerning or publicizing the release of the book, including any statements
announcing the date the book would be published or available for purchase.
Defendant must describe all steps he took, or communications he had with the
publisher or any retailer, if any, concerning the release or sale of the book between
the entry of the order on February 21, 2019 and March 1, 2019, and he must produce
any records reflecting those communications.
SO ORDERED.
AMY BERMAN JACKSON
United States District Judge
DATE: March 5, 2019
DontBooVote
(901 posts)However, I'm also supportive of Judge Jackson's need to build a solid case that she gave Stone every opportunity to abide by her orders. She has done a sufficient job of showing restraint so that she could not be credibly accused later of having engaged in judicial overreach or bias.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, this is just my perception of her restraint in not tossing his pointy-headed numbskull in the slammer already. This is strike three, hopefully.
MH1
(17,600 posts)Of course a poor black dude would never get the opportunity to make such a mockery of a judge's order like that ... but if he did, he wouldn't get a week to figure out and then "explain yourself".
My exact words on reading the o.p. were somewhat more profanity-laden.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)uponit7771
(90,348 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,753 posts)They really don't believe judges have the resolve to follow through on their warnings.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,388 posts)Facts support their assumption of privilege.
AlexSFCA
(6,139 posts)Firestorm49
(4,036 posts)Jail the mother!
ffr
(22,671 posts)NOT!
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)This is Stone, not Manafort.
ffr
(22,671 posts)I'm not thinking of Manfort, nor was I thinking of Gates. I do think about Mike Pence a lot. How did you know I was thinking about Mike Pence?
The grand jury has already spoken with their indictments. This will be the judge which is why stone is trying all these stunts to get her to recuse. My advice, never think of pence before eating, it's bad for the digestion.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,189 posts)I doubt he will at this point.
A grand jury has already indicted Stone so their job is done.
CharleyDog
(758 posts)think they "know more than you" and think rules and laws don't apply to themselves, because "I know more than you, so ha ha ha." (I hear this a lot from Republican family members so sure they are right.