Lawmakers to DoD: You knew about water contamination. Why haven't you done more?

[riversedge]

The House Oversight committee is busy!!--Dem controlled finally and getting things done



Lawmakers to DoD: You knew about water contamination. Why haven’t you done more?

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2019/03/06/lawmakers-to-dod-you-knew-about-water-contamination-why-havent-you-done-more/


By: Tara Copp   18 hours ago


The Pentagon’s decision not to take action to protect military families from decades of exposure to cancer-causing chemicals until a 2016 Environmental Protection Agency warning did not sit well with members of Congress, who questioned Defense Department leadership on the issue at a hearing Wednesday.

“To put it charitably: it is unclear why DoD feels justified in passing the buck to the EPA," said House Oversight and Reform subcommittee on the environment chairman Rep. Harley Rouda, D-Calif. “Particularly in light of evidence suggesting DoD’s awareness of the toxicity of the chemicals since the early 1980s.”


Rouda and ranking member James Comer, R-Ky., heard testimony from EPA Assistant Administrator for Water Dave Ross and Maureen Sullivan, deputy assistant secretary of defense for environment.

The perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl chemical compounds in question are found in everyday household items, but they were concentrated in firefighting foam the military used until just last year.
................................



16 cancer cases in one family: Base water contamination fight moves to Congress


16 family cancers, 10 deaths, one military community raises questions of why PFAS was used for so long when at least the Army knew it was harmful.
By: Tara Copp

[Hortensis]

1. DEMOCRATIC house lawmakers to DoD.

These were considered hazardous in various states before 1991, when one base stopped using them. That's damning.

But at least one other DoD installation, Fort Carson in Colorado, use of the chemicals was stopped in 1991 after an Army Corps of Engineers study looked at harmful chemicals at its installations.

“Aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) is considered a hazardous material in a number of states,” the 1991 study, which was obtained by Military Times, read. “Firefighting operations that use AFFF must be replaced with nonhazardous substitutes.”

DoD has previously said that until the 2016 guidance from EPA on recommended exposure level limits, it did not know the severity of its exposure problem, which spurred it voluntarily providing filters and shutting some water sources, EPA’s guidance is not enforceable,

In March 2018, at the direction of Congress, DoD published its first-ever assessment of each contaminated base where the compounds had been found in either on-base or off-base water sources. More than 126 locations were identified — some with exposure levels hundreds of times greater than EPA’s 70 parts per trillion recommendation.