Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

garybeck

(10,069 posts)
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 07:56 PM Mar 2019

How/Why do we know about the cigar bar meeting with Kilimnik??

There is a story out there that most of us have heard by now, that Manafort and Gates met with Kilimnik in a cigar bar, to discuss various things and that Manafort gave some documents (possibly polling data) to Kilimnik.

Andrew Weissmann said that this meeting goes to the heart of the whole investigation.

Where does this story come from?

I've been trying to figure it out and the closest I can come is that Mueller's team alleges that Manafort continued to lie after his plea agreement and one of the things that he lied about was his contacts with Kilimnik. In court documents:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.190597/gov.uscourts.dcd.190597.509.0_2.pdf

it clearly says that he lied about his contacts with Kilimnik.

But nowhere in those court documents can i find a description of the meeting, or any specifics on what he lied about, other than it was his contact with Kilimnik.

This NY Times article gets a little more specific, saying that in a closed door hearing, prosecutors revealed that Kilminik and Manafort were discussing russian sanctions and "peace" with ukraine.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/10/us/politics/manafort-mueller-russia-inquiry.html

and at the end of the article there is a cryptic sentence:

What Mr. Manafort and Mr. Kilimnik discussed about the Russia-Ukraine conflict is not all that concerned prosecutors. Another issue is a directive from Mr. Manafort to Mr. Gates to turn over Trump campaign polling data to Mr. Kilimnik in the midst of the presidential race.

The transcript suggests that Mr. Manafort claims that he wanted only public data transferred. But Mr. Weissmann told the judge that the question of whether any American, wittingly or unwittingly, engaged with Russians who were interfering in the election relates to “the core” of the special counsel’s inquiry.


my question is, can we see that transcript from the closed-door hearing? if the NY Times Reporter saw it, can't we see it too?

it appears that the fact that the NY Times reporter got to read the transcript from that closed door hearing is the only reason we know about the cigar bar meeting and the polling data transfer.

I for one would love to see that transcript myself.

does anyone know if that transcript is available to the public? and if not, how did the NY Times reporter get to see it?

thanks
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How/Why do we know about the cigar bar meeting with Kilimnik?? (Original Post) garybeck Mar 2019 OP
I don't have the answer manor321 Mar 2019 #1
try contacting the reporter on his/her twitter feed? Grasswire2 Mar 2019 #2
I follow Ken Vogel on twitter. Grasswire2 Mar 2019 #3
thanks. i'm not on twitter :) garybeck Mar 2019 #4
when I googled for the story, I got a lot of hits of commentary about it Grasswire2 Mar 2019 #6
Gates was at the meeting and is cooperating. Sneederbunk Mar 2019 #5
yeah, but he certainly isn't cooperating in public. my question is garybeck Mar 2019 #9
This is what I found: UniteFightBack Mar 2019 #7
OK, then..... garybeck Mar 2019 #11
is this it? Grasswire2 Mar 2019 #8
now that might be it!!!! garybeck Mar 2019 #12
Rick Gates told Mueller everything, Manafort didn't FakeNoose Mar 2019 #10
that's not my question garybeck Mar 2019 #13
 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
1. I don't have the answer
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 08:00 PM
Mar 2019

I can't answer your question but isn't the giving of the polling data one of the things that Manafort's lawyers accidentally released because they didn't redact properly? I'd suggest googling what they failed to redact.

Grasswire2

(13,849 posts)
6. when I googled for the story, I got a lot of hits of commentary about it
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 08:24 PM
Mar 2019

you might find a hint somewhere.

garybeck

(10,069 posts)
9. yeah, but he certainly isn't cooperating in public. my question is
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 08:58 PM
Mar 2019

how do WE, the public, know about the meeting. is it in the transcript from the closed-door hearing referenced in the NY Times article? if so we should be able to see that transcript. if not, it must have been leaked.

either way, my motivation is that I like to know what i'm talking about. if i'm going to bring up that meeting in coversation with friends (or trumpsters on facebook). i want to know what i'm talking about. it is very helpful to have source information. at this point it is very hazy where that information came from.

 

UniteFightBack

(8,231 posts)
7. This is what I found:
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 08:25 PM
Mar 2019
https://www.alternet.org/2019/02/why-a-shady-meeting-in-a-cigar-bar-could-provide-key-evidence-of-a-trump-russia-conspiracy/

"The information about the Grand Havana meeting is not appearing now because it’s emerged as part of a leak or a deliberate release by the special counsel. It’s because Manafort’s statements about the meeting are a key feature of charges that he continued to lie to investigators even after agreeing to provide evidence to the special counsel in exchange for a reduced prison sentence. And one of the things that Manafort appears to have lied about was just how much of a two-way street there was between the Trump campaign and Moscow."


garybeck

(10,069 posts)
11. OK, then.....
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 09:02 PM
Mar 2019

your quote says it emerged as part of a leak or a deliberate release by the special counsel.

shouldn't we know which one of these it is?

if it was deliberately released by the special counsel, there should be a document somewhere, a court filing or a transcript.... how did they "release" it?

or if it is a leak, then usually we know who it was leaked to, and that reporter will give some kind of information about the sources without revealing who they are.

IMHO it is important for us to know if a story is a leak (not always trustworthy) or a deliberate release by the special counsel (that would be very trustworthy).

it is just kind of odd if you ask me, that we don't seem to know where this information came from.

FakeNoose

(40,227 posts)
10. Rick Gates told Mueller everything, Manafort didn't
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 09:00 PM
Mar 2019

When Mueller learned the date and location of the meeting, he was probably able to get confirmation from other witnesses - people who were there but not involved. That's usually how those things work.

garybeck

(10,069 posts)
13. that's not my question
Sun Mar 10, 2019, 09:22 PM
Mar 2019

my question is how do WE know about it. not how does Mueller know about it. thanks tho !

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How/Why do we know about ...