So the NYT put a picture of the actresses who bribed schools to get in but did not show the

[redstatebluegirl]

rich white guys from corporate America, makes sense I guess, we don't want to bite off the hand the feeds you.

[flying_wahini]

1. Yes, William Macy's name got left off, too.

[Quemado]

5. William Macy was not named in the complaint, but

there seems to be little doubt that Macy was an active participant in the fraud, according to Vulture.com.

[malaise]

2. M$Greedia never fail

to cover for corporations

[donkeypoofed]

3. Also - they're alot prettier

That could be part of it. They're also both more well known by the masses.

[Sherman A1]

6. and

their photos are easily available. Never attribute to an agenda what can be explained by general laziness.

[Princess Turandot]

4. They're also the only widely recognizable people on the indictment, Huffman at least is...

...since Macy wasn't indicted. Were any of the other women shown anywhere? There were several businesswomen-mamas indicted too.

The most significant name on the list is probably Gordon Caplan, whom the law outlets are all reporting on, because he's the co-chair of one of the most prominent law firms in the world.

[Blue_Tires]

7. This isn't new

All things being equal, news always defaults to celebs/cute faces/sexy bodies

[redstatebluegirl]

8. They could have at least listed them and where they work.

[Inkfreak]

9. The most recognizable in a huge scandal.

Get the front page.

Has zero to do with them being women. And that is an outstanding deflection away from the true issue of wealth buying privilege.

I don’t feel shit for them.

[Power 2 the People]

10. +1