Food for thought: Why would Mueller have bothered to indict a bunch of Russian hackers...

[Tommy_Carcetti]

….knowing they would never been subject to extradition and prosecution in the US, if it weren't to lay the foundation for something else?

Wait for the report.

[lancelyons]

1. Mueller is a republican.

He needed to show some evidence of his work.

Period

[Tommy_Carcetti]

3. The evidence is in Bill Barr's office as we speak.

It is our duty to demand that we see it, not his.

[lancelyons]

5. That's a good reach but that won't happen

[Tommy_Carcetti]

7. Well, thank you for your opinion. nt

[lancelyons]

9. Fact remains you are reaching without factual basis.

[Tommy_Carcetti]

10. There is no factual basis for any of us right now.

Only inferences.

You can go your way, and I can go mine.

[at140]

12. Sounds plausible ..

Must show some results due to time and money spent.

[SWBTATTReg]

2. I agree with your thought...nt

[Arkansas Granny]

4. I've been trying all along not to get too wrapped up in this.

I remember Fitzmas. I hope Mueller found something, but I'm not holding my breath.

[Tommy_Carcetti]

6. This is light years beyond what got us to Fitzmas.

And we're not near an end stage yet.

Unless there is a complete systematic breakdown, don't even bother to compare the two.

[Arkansas Granny]

11. I'm not comparing the investigations. I'm just not getting my hopes yet.

I'd rather be pleasantly surprised instead of disappointed at the outcome.

[FBaggins]

8. Why wouldn't he?

Even if no collusion of any kind were uncovered... his mandate included crimes discovered during the investigation.