Get Mueller and Barr before a committee under oath

[SHRED]

ASAP

If this report is how Barr has described it I will take back every defense I ever made of Mueller. All of it.

Fucking Republicans.

[Baitball Blogger]

1. Put them under oath. Beautiful.

[Puzzledtraveller]

2. Mueller is a Republican

and essentially has always been working for Trump. I warned about lionizing Mueller, many did, not saying you did but many, not too different than the Avanetti 2020 bunch. I think pressing the matter will be a negative for us. Just my 2c.

[LovingA2andMI]

10. Smart 2 Cents....

Impeach on what we have. Know that the Senate will not remove. Place the fact that GOP did not remove on them subverting America's Democracy for a Plutocracy. Run on that in 2020. Win just enough to take the Presidency of the United States.

Anything else will be a LOST.

[roamer65]

3. I am in complete agreement with you, SHRED.

California needs to start thinking and acting like an independent nation if this is a true description of the Mueller report.

It means we have an abusive and unresponsive federal “government”.

[arthritisR_US]

14. Nailed it!👍✊️

[SHRED]

17. Agreed

[democratisphere]

4. It is like Mueller wimped out at the end of the investigation by

not forcing drumpf et al to be questioned under oath and apparently caving in to Barr who became the sole decider. I smell a rat aka rethug corruption.

[rockfordfile]

6. Mueller didn't question Trump. Not face to face on a serious issue and investigation.

He white washed it.

[arthritisR_US]

15. Mueller and Barr will have to ask themselves, sometime down the road, if

placating to this malignant narcissistic orange shitgibbon was honourably servering their country or selling democracy and themselves to the devil.

[onecaliberal]

5. I have said so many times. There are no good republicans. Not one.

[pnwmom]

7. Why would you believe anything Barr wrote? We know from the 19 page memo

he sent to Trump last summer that he had already decided Mueller's case against him was garbage, and that no President can be convicted of obstruction. the Senate confirmed him anyway.

So Barr came in determined to do a job for Trump, and he did.

We won't know the truth about Mueller till we read his actual report and hear him testify before the House.

[SHRED]

8. Good point

That's why I said "if".

[uponit7771]

13. +1

[uponit7771]

9. K&R, If Mueller truly punted then he failed to make a "tough decision" & that's what he's paid to do

[pnwmom]

11. Why should we believe he punted? The Watergate "road map" was used by Congress

to examine the evidence against Nixon, pro and con.

Jaworkski didn't tell Congress what to think -- he gave them the evidence.

I think that's what Mueller intended to do. But Barr's trying to sit on the report instead.

[uponit7771]

12. +1, I made similar point in an OP (link)

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211953199

[duforsure]

16. Don't forget that Felix Sater

Will be before the House this Wed. to testify, and he could expose a lot more on trump too, exposing what Barr has done by covering it up for trump. Barr could also be in trouble if he lies , and knows it if he has to testify. Mueller may have been stopped , which will come out, and put Barr on the spot. trump will soon be looking at undermining the SDNY investigations by way of firing anyone he can to obstruct that investigation to using Barr and others to do it for him. Maybe SDNY and others are already set to pounce on all the rest of these criminals very soon. Lets hope they go in and arrest and perp walk them all including trump before the public. Barr showed the county he works for trump , not the American people. History will not be kind to him either for it.