Nadler is zeroing in on Barr perjury!

[hlthe2b]

Link to tweet

I note with interest AG Barr’s 4/10 Senate testimony. “Q: Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion? A: I don’t know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion.” Now it appears that Mueller objected in this 3/27 letter.

[Pacifist Patriot]

1. That's what I'm seeing!

[malaise]

2. Schiff on now

Lock them up

[canetoad]

3. This is a BFD

Attorney General on record lying to the Senate. Bring it on.

[lastlib]

5. He Fucking KNEW what Mueller's conclusions were!

He fucking LIED saying he didn't! He was under oath, and he fucking LIED! That, folks, is PERJURY!

[avebury]

11. Unfortunately the Rethugs still control

the Senate.

[abqtommy]

4. Investigation leads to facts.

Facts lead to indictment. Indictment leads to conviction. That's the process that we'll put to good use for
all these fucking fascists.

[Gothmog]

6. Barr lied to Congress

Link to tweet

[Takket]

7. lying sack of shit! IMPEACH HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Grammy23]

17. Watch him look down at the desk at the end of his answer.

That weasel knew it was a lie and could not look Van Hollen in the eye.

[spanone]

8. I watched him tell that lie.

[pbmus]

9. Mueller this time next year will be

Called to Congress to testify about his abusive tactics...

And golden shower Conman will rejoice with the dude ball cutter lady from Iowa....

Links in racist nationalist orgs will resonate across this glorious land..

And congress will be talking about impeachment, ah, investigations galore...

[Gothmog]

10. From the Hoarse Whisperer

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[Mr.Bill]

12. Republicans in the Senate

will not vote to remove Barr from office because he's all that stands between them and indictment for their own crimes. The problem is the criminals in our government are so high up there is no one to arrest, indict and convict them. Until 20+ republican Senators turn against Trump and his crew, nothing will happen. That's what had to happen to bring Nixon down.

The problem there aren't 20+ republican Senators who are not guilty themselves. In the Watergate era, there was.

[Bluesaph]

13. Has anyone seen the actual letter?

Because I can see Barr's defense:

I asked Mueller point blank if there was anything he didn't agree with in my letter to congress and he said, 'No.'"

From what I've seen thus far, Mueller was upset at the MEDIA for their INTERPRETATION of Barr's "summary". I *wish* Mueller had said, "Yes, I disagree with your summary because we both know Donald Trump committed obstruction, and we both know he colluded, although we cannot prove it just yet." He DID NOT say that!

That's what Washington Post article says, anyway. But I'd like to see the actual letter.

[triron]

14. Your post is simply obstructionist.

[Bluesaph]

16. Don't attack the messenger

I hope I’m wrong. But look who we are dealing with. Spinners and liars.

[GulfCoast66]

18. I think he made a valid point.

Granted, he pissed in the Cheerios of all those thinking this is the new bring down Trump story.

But some of us never fell for the whole Mueller report as a savior thing as are tired of seeing Lucy pull the Football away on DU again and again.

Some of us believe the election of 2020 is all that matters. Others may disagree.

[CaptainTruth]

15. Totally FUBARR