General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmalaise
(269,278 posts)monmouth4
(9,711 posts)mobeau69
(11,167 posts)Funtatlaguy
(10,893 posts)Any chicken 🐔 metaphors?
Delmette2.0
(4,177 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,953 posts)The question what does it mean when a member moves to strike the last word was posed. The answer was that it invokes the five minute rule allowing members to lengthen debate by five minutes.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?155213-1/capitol-question-strike-word
This allows the members to have time to give additional statements (up to 5 minutes each).
Delmette2.0
(4,177 posts)Or just for the person is made the request?
BumRushDaShow
(129,953 posts)is extended 5 minutes per every "motion to strike the last word" (the last word, in terms of the Congressional record, would have been the regular conclusionary statement that would have ended a regular debate). It is done as a Parliamentary "motion" and is an optional request for members.
Meaning that there is normally a fixed time for debate but if a member makes a motion to "strike the last word" once the debate period has ended (and the motion is agreed to - which it normally is) then that member gets up to 5 minutes to speak, the remarks then added on to the debate time (not everyone must speak if they don't want to). If you have 20 members make the motion and no one objects and they each use the 5 minutes, then the total time gets extended by 100 minutes.
Delmette2.0
(4,177 posts)I am learning so much from DU when these hearings are going on.
mobeau69
(11,167 posts)When a member says they "move to strike the last word" it, too, is part of that formality. Theyre asking to strike, or delete, the very last word of the amendment under debate, indicating that theyre offering a pro forma amendment to replace that last word.
Thats exactly what a pro forma amendment is. As a formality, a member can simply say theyre offering an amendment to the amendment under debate, and get their own five minutes to speak. They never even have to submit a real amendment. Just verbally saying theyre offering one, as a formality, gives them five minutes.
Delmette2.0
(4,177 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,953 posts)(Didn't think he had it in him )
mobeau69
(11,167 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,953 posts)mobeau69
(11,167 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,953 posts)so I don't think there is any issue.
But they want all of their statements to be included in the Congressional record because this is historic.
mobeau69
(11,167 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,953 posts)(mostly listening... although I should be vacuuming.. May have to pull out the earbuds and stream on a phone. )