Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aikoaiko

(34,163 posts)
Tue May 28, 2019, 04:42 PM May 2019

ATL Journal Constitution: Broad Georgia ethics probe targets Abrams -- and her backers


damn it.

https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/broad-georgia-ethics-probe-targets-abrams-and-her-backers/NBT2JDLOZqDgUq1vTz4xOO/?utm_source=newspaper&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=8416631&ecmp=newspaper_email&

The head of Georgia’s ethics commission has filed a spate of subpoenas targeting groups led by Stacey Abrams and the chairwoman of the state Democratic Party, prompting criticism that he’s trying to exact political revenge against Republican Gov. Brian Kemp’s political opponents.


The subpoenas obtained by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution were filed on April 26 by new ethics chief David Emadi and seek extensive financial, bank and payroll records from the Abrams’ campaign, which raised roughly $30 million in last year’s race against Kemp.

The ethics office also wants all correspondence between the Abrams campaign and a constellation of left-leaning groups that registered and mobilized voters, many with a focus on energizing minorities. They include the voting rights group Abrams helped launch and a nonprofit co-founded by state Sen. Nikema Williams, the new leader of the state Democratic Party.

In the documents, Emadi reveals that investigators intend to present evidence that the Abrams campaign accepted donations from four of the groups that exceeded maximum contribution limits for a statewide campaign.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

uponit7771

(90,316 posts)
3. Kemp excluded 13,000 voters & won by 14000 and wants to open an ethics investigation on Abrams??!
Tue May 28, 2019, 04:47 PM
May 2019

LOCK HIM UP!!

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
7. KKKemp actually won by roughly 55,000 votes. Still more work to do in Georgia until the rubes
Tue May 28, 2019, 04:58 PM
May 2019

die off.

uponit7771

(90,316 posts)
10. Got it, I'm thinking of the Run Off vote not the end count. It would've been a run off if Kemp would
Tue May 28, 2019, 05:42 PM
May 2019

... not have cheated and knocked off 13000 + mostly democratic votes.

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
4. I hope kemp et al end up crawling back to their holes
Tue May 28, 2019, 04:47 PM
May 2019

with their tails between their legs and balls kicked up into their abdomens.

RANDYWILDMAN

(2,664 posts)
5. Can you believe it....
Tue May 28, 2019, 04:48 PM
May 2019

She mobilized all those uppity people to vote for her and raised all that money and the lovely repubs are going to investigate how she did to make sure nobody can do it again...

The winners write the history or in the case of Georgia, the cheaters write the history

rurallib

(62,387 posts)
6. Is this a trial test to see if Kemp can do it in Georgia, then Donald
Tue May 28, 2019, 04:55 PM
May 2019

can do it at the federal level?

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
8. Gosh, aren't the Republicans worried about overplaying their hand and turning off swing voters?
Tue May 28, 2019, 05:04 PM
May 2019

Correct, gratuitous. You have control of the board.

I'll finish the category, Alex. Questions You'll Never Hear from the Media for $1000.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ATL Journal Constitution:...