Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uponit7771

(90,364 posts)
Wed May 29, 2019, 11:57 AM May 2019

Just heard from died in the wool MAGA Cultist REALLY disappointed Mueller wont go before congress !!

Just heard from died in the wool MAGA Cultist REALLY disappointed Mueller wont go before congress and say anything outside of what's in the report.

... and that's the one thing we agree on!!

Sounds like Mueller has no plans to testify in front of congress in front of camera's or behind closed doors !!


Mueller NEEDS TO TESTIFY TO CONGRESS !!!

This is what's on FAUX News !!!


MUELLER NOT GOING TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS !!!

Some bullshit, no one is king in this country

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just heard from died in the wool MAGA Cultist REALLY disappointed Mueller wont go before congress !! (Original Post) uponit7771 May 2019 OP
He is disappointed in Mueller because Mueller said that Trump lied. He did not still_one May 2019 #1
No, disappointed Mueller wont go before congress !! uponit7771 May 2019 #2
You don't need Mueller. The report speaks for Mueller still_one May 2019 #3
This is false on its face, nothing human "speaks for itself" 100% and congress has questions that uponit7771 May 2019 #4
I am just relating what he said this morning. Whether there is substance or not Nadler said this still_one May 2019 #5

still_one

(92,397 posts)
1. He is disappointed in Mueller because Mueller said that Trump lied. He did not
Wed May 29, 2019, 12:00 PM
May 2019

exonerate him

He is also disappointed because he said there was definite foreign interference in our election

It is up to the House now

uponit7771

(90,364 posts)
4. This is false on its face, nothing human "speaks for itself" 100% and congress has questions that
Wed May 29, 2019, 12:22 PM
May 2019

... are needed to be answered outside of the context of just the investigation including did Barr end the investigation or early etc

still_one

(92,397 posts)
5. I am just relating what he said this morning. Whether there is substance or not Nadler said this
Wed May 29, 2019, 01:16 PM
May 2019

morning that it was up to the House now, which is also effectively what Mueller said, if they want to remove Trump so he could be indicted, it is up to Congress to impeach.

Mueller is a private citizen, and Congress can call him, but he said that if it regards what he investigated, he will refer to the report.

He also made it clear that the DOJ told him that it was not Constitutional to indict a sitting President, and that is why it is up to the House to do their job.

No use debating whether a sitting president can be indicted or not, it would be a waste of time, and if it finally got before the SC, they would probably rule that you need to remove a President by impeachment first, then he could be indicted if the Senate convicted him.

I also realize you are well aware of what I am saying

but either way, whether impeaching, or calling for Mueller to testify, it is up to the House







Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just heard from died in t...