Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mueller just nailed the Con's ass (Original Post) malaise May 2019 OP
I am looking forward to his goon squad... BlueJac May 2019 #1
! Marcuse May 2019 #6
And we all knew it too. Barr didn't do anything but obstruct the truth from the American people... SWBTATTReg May 2019 #2
I want Barr to be disbarred malaise May 2019 #3
You nailed it! nt SWBTATTReg May 2019 #4
Nadler on now tearing the Con a new one malaise May 2019 #11
Wonderful! I can already see the new election signs, 'throw the thug out of office', ... SWBTATTReg May 2019 #15
Love him. He's so utterly sober and sobering when he speaks. Good post. Thanks. emmaverybo May 2019 #52
he's a sneaky bdamomma May 2019 #5
Barr is in trouble also . . . Iliyah May 2019 #7
Really. All they have left is lying, cheating, stealing, etc. Scumbags don't have anything ... SWBTATTReg May 2019 #12
I wish Mueller had said Barr misrepresented his report. SunSeeker May 2019 #8
I am reading that statement differently. ZZenith May 2019 #14
I very much doubt Barr makes ANY decisions "in good faith" Skittles May 2019 #17
Indeed, but I very much doubt that Robert Mueller is the kind of man ZZenith May 2019 #18
I find it disappointing Skittles May 2019 #19
+1 SunSeeker May 2019 #21
I wholeheartedly agree. ZZenith May 2019 #22
Mueller is not doing what he could be doing, as far as I am concerned, MORE concerned about Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #27
he's leaving it up to Democrats to do the right thing Skittles May 2019 #28
I want those fucking questions answered GOD DAMMIT, i want to know if BARR shut him down Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #30
He's answered the second part of your question already. ZZenith May 2019 #32
He answered about wanting to indict ANY other person and being from prevented? Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #35
He could not proceed because he was obstructed. ZZenith May 2019 #37
That comes in two parts, did he not indict someone because everyone would lie, that is one Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #38
You would no doubt be happier if the man overstepped his boundaries ZZenith May 2019 #39
No rules precluded Mueller from stating Trump committed a crime. SunSeeker May 2019 #47
You don't seem to understand how our legal system works. ZZenith May 2019 #49
Then why did ALL former people in his place testify? Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #58
No one has ever been in his place. ZZenith May 2019 #59
I dont like to BASH Democrats. Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #67
Wanting Democrats to exercise their only remaining remedy ZZenith May 2019 #68
+1, both questions need to be asked and or confirmed uponit7771 May 2019 #51
me too Skittles May 2019 #56
A True Blue American May 2019 #29
Exactly. ZZenith May 2019 #50
Right, he (and WE) sure as hell SHOULD question barr's 'good faith.' elleng May 2019 #34
This is a lie. Mr.Bill May 2019 #41
Exactly. nt SunSeeker May 2019 #44
WTF?! "The Attorney General preferred to make the entire report public all at once." csziggy May 2019 #42
And, unlike Ken Starr, is refusing to release the grand jury materials! SunSeeker May 2019 #43
Exactly! csziggy May 2019 #46
He won't do that. You want him to do the work the aware public and the House needs to do. If he emmaverybo May 2019 #55
I don't want him to do "my bidding." I wanted him to do his job. SunSeeker May 2019 #60
He just bent over backwards when he broke DOJ protocol by discussing the subject of an emmaverybo May 2019 #62
Mueller is a SPECIAL COUNSEL--required by law to write a report and "discuss the subject." SunSeeker May 2019 #63
Dershowitz is not credible, but a shill. If you had the time and care to read what he said, or if emmaverybo May 2019 #64
Dershowitz is sucking up to Trump for a SCOTUS appointment. SunSeeker May 2019 #66
I looked over at Free Republic Beringia May 2019 #9
I agree! MoonRiver May 2019 #10
Yep. And Giuliani and Dershowitz are already bitching about it. I've posted a couple of highplainsdem May 2019 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author brandnewday2009 May 2019 #16
LOL malaise May 2019 #20
I swear I will break Photoshop today! Generic Other May 2019 #23
We know the truth malaise May 2019 #24
Yep Generic Other May 2019 #25
We should make that viral malaise May 2019 #57
Actually Mueller just reminded people that that is Congress' job. n/t PoliticAverse May 2019 #26
Is it congress' job to find out if Barr shut him down prematlurely when Barr wont go before Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #31
I agree with that part malaise May 2019 #33
I can think of a shit ton of questions to ask Mueller about what Barr did, Whitaker, about Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #36
That issue alone is enough to hear Mueller's testimony. BigmanPigman May 2019 #40
When Trump finally realizes the full import of Mueller's damning statement today, sop May 2019 #45
True but the public will begin realizing the full import of this report on malaise May 2019 #48
Thanks Mueller. Once again, as Kamala Harris says, he did his duty. nt emmaverybo May 2019 #65
Trump's goose is cooked this time Bonx May 2019 #53
They were totally unprepared for this one malaise May 2019 #54
He did indeed mcar May 2019 #61

SWBTATTReg

(22,183 posts)
2. And we all knew it too. Barr didn't do anything but obstruct the truth from the American people...
Wed May 29, 2019, 01:54 PM
May 2019

I hope perhaps Congress will impeach Barr as he deserves so much, if anything, for misleading Congress and the American people with his faked summaries of Mueller's report.

malaise

(269,237 posts)
3. I want Barr to be disbarred
Wed May 29, 2019, 01:56 PM
May 2019

THey can also impeach him but he is a disgrace to the legal profession

malaise

(269,237 posts)
11. Nadler on now tearing the Con a new one
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:08 PM
May 2019

Russia attacked our political system
The Con benefited from the attack
The Con obstructed justice

The report did not exonerate the Con

This is great - Go Nadler

SWBTATTReg

(22,183 posts)
15. Wonderful! I can already see the new election signs, 'throw the thug out of office', ...
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:16 PM
May 2019

'throw the unindicted defendant 1' out of office, etc. (I can't come up w/ anything fancy now at the moment, but you get the gist of it). This needs to be hammered again and again against the idiot in chief, who's proved his incompetence many times over.

His supporters in the senate and elsewhere need to be nailed too, for supporting basically a crook. Plain and simple. They need to be asked why they are supporting a crook in office? Why won't you let the American people look at rump's tax returns, rump's financial papers, etc.? What do you have to hide?

If one sees one cockroach come out from underneath a rock, chances are they are loads more cockroaches. Wonder what other crap rump has under his rocks?

Take care Malaise!

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
7. Barr is in trouble also . . .
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:03 PM
May 2019

I know the Republican senate and those in the house are going to defend them to the hiltz with lies lies and Barr will distort the IC classified documents, but alas, for over two years now, all this administration have done, t-rump have done, and the Republicans have done is lie to the American people.

Cheat, steal, suppress . . .

SWBTATTReg

(22,183 posts)
12. Really. All they have left is lying, cheating, stealing, etc. Scumbags don't have anything ...
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:08 PM
May 2019

else in their playbooks so they have to resort to these type of tactics. Won't work anymore since everyone is aware of their tactics and once used, won't work again. People are going to be hyper alert to any negative crap coming out about any democratic candidates and also, rump has used up his brownie points with way too many tweets, no one's paying attention to him any longer. I just hope rump doesn't go nuts, but sorry to say I think he will do something stupid...just wait (that it, beyond his normal stupid doings).

SunSeeker

(51,771 posts)
8. I wish Mueller had said Barr misrepresented his report.
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:05 PM
May 2019

Instead, what people will take away from his statement is that Barr acted in "good faith."

Here's what Mueller actually said re Barr:


We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the Attorney General—as required by Department regulations.

The Attorney General then concluded that it was appropriate to provide our report to Congress and the American people.

At one point in time I requested that certain portions of the report be released. The Attorney General preferred to make the entire report public all at once. We appreciate that the Attorney General made the report largely public. I do not question the Attorney General’s good faith in that decision.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/mueller-statement-read-special-counsel-s-full-remarks-n1011351

To suggest that ANYTHING Barr did in the process was in "good faith" is a damn lie. I think Mueller lied when he said Barr released the report in good faith. And there was nothing in the Report about Barr. So much for Mueller 's vow not to say anything that isn't in the report!

ZZenith

(4,130 posts)
14. I am reading that statement differently.
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:10 PM
May 2019

“I do not question the Attorney General’s good faith in that decision” implies that he questions his good faith in other decisions.

ZZenith

(4,130 posts)
18. Indeed, but I very much doubt that Robert Mueller is the kind of man
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:32 PM
May 2019

who would state that so plainly. By pointing out this one instance he implies there are others where Barr didn’t act in good faith.

Skittles

(153,243 posts)
19. I find it disappointing
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:35 PM
May 2019

No doubt Mueller is trying to be diplomatic but I think times like this require much more courage.

ZZenith

(4,130 posts)
22. I wholeheartedly agree.
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:38 PM
May 2019

Wisdom includes knowing when to throw out the rule book, but he’s clearly trying to inoculate himself against the inevitable charges of impropriety.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,131 posts)
27. Mueller is not doing what he could be doing, as far as I am concerned, MORE concerned about
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:45 PM
May 2019

answering politically charged questions than SAVING US FROM FASCISM?

I misjudged him, I thought he would not do this

fuck this

Did BARR shut you DOWN? You wont even answer THAT question?




Did he prevent you from indicting anyone?

Eliot Rosewater

(31,131 posts)
30. I want those fucking questions answered GOD DAMMIT, i want to know if BARR shut him down
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:49 PM
May 2019

or prevented him from indictments

ZZenith

(4,130 posts)
37. He could not proceed because he was obstructed.
Wed May 29, 2019, 03:09 PM
May 2019

It’s all pretty clear if you take the time to parse what’s been said.

The legal profession rarely speaks in plain English.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,131 posts)
38. That comes in two parts, did he not indict someone because everyone would lie, that is one
Wed May 29, 2019, 03:10 PM
May 2019

question and did you not indict someone because BARR stopped you?

We are in a state of constitutional crisis and the guy who knows more than anyone else about what happened says he aint talking

bullshit

It is NOT all in the report, NOT if we cant SEE the whole thing and surely not what Barr or whitaker did and probably conversations with others

ZZenith

(4,130 posts)
39. You would no doubt be happier if the man overstepped his boundaries
Wed May 29, 2019, 03:17 PM
May 2019

but he’s refrained from doing so and it’s to his credit, as much as I wish things were different.

Shall we not abide by the prescribed rules in order to bring to justice those who have refused to abide by the rules?

The man has come out and made it clear that he’s gone as far as his station has allowed him to. Direct your anger at those who now hesitate to pick up the baton.

SunSeeker

(51,771 posts)
47. No rules precluded Mueller from stating Trump committed a crime.
Wed May 29, 2019, 04:28 PM
May 2019

Mueller was only precluded from INDICTING Trump by DOJ policy. He was hired to determine if any crimes were committed by the Trump campaign with regard to the Russian attack on our democracy. He did so with respect to everyone in tge campaign except for Trump. He chickened out when it came to Trump, and used the exvuse that he did not think it would be "fair" to Trump to state that he committed a crime, since he wasn't bring an indictment.

ZZenith

(4,130 posts)
49. You don't seem to understand how our legal system works.
Wed May 29, 2019, 04:42 PM
May 2019

I am glad others do.

In no universe was the special prosecutor going to stand at the podium today and shout, “J’accuse...!”

It would not be in your best interest had he done so.

ZZenith

(4,130 posts)
59. No one has ever been in his place.
Wed May 29, 2019, 05:42 PM
May 2019

We are at a unique juncture in our history. Robert Mueller has done what was asked of him and has done everything within the scope of his legal power to move the case along to its next proper step.

Why you are wasting time here on this thread and not calling the Speaker of the House’s office demanding impeachment is a mystery to me.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,131 posts)
67. I dont like to BASH Democrats.
Thu May 30, 2019, 03:05 PM
May 2019

Which is what a lot of this is about, some folks are sincere, some are not, some are using this opportunity to once again BASH democrats.

ZZenith

(4,130 posts)
68. Wanting Democrats to exercise their only remaining remedy
Thu May 30, 2019, 03:46 PM
May 2019

to curb an out-of-control wannabe dictator could be misconstrued as “bashing” them, I can see that.

Mr.Bill

(24,344 posts)
41. This is a lie.
Wed May 29, 2019, 04:03 PM
May 2019

The entire report has not been made public. Only what Barr wants to be made public. There are people in Congress with high enough security clearances to see the entire unredacted report. Until that happens evidence is being withheld from Congress.

csziggy

(34,139 posts)
42. WTF?! "The Attorney General preferred to make the entire report public all at once."
Wed May 29, 2019, 04:08 PM
May 2019

No, the AG has NOT released the "entire report" - he released selected parts and left out big chunks of it.

SunSeeker

(51,771 posts)
43. And, unlike Ken Starr, is refusing to release the grand jury materials!
Wed May 29, 2019, 04:21 PM
May 2019

That is a treasure trove of evidence the House could never recreate through their hearings.

csziggy

(34,139 posts)
46. Exactly!
Wed May 29, 2019, 04:25 PM
May 2019

Congress needs the complete, unredacted report. If the House went to Impeachment Hearings, they would have the clout to require this material - and if they don't get it, enforce contempt on everyone involved.

This scattershot set of committees does not have the impact that impeachment investigations would have.

Sorry I'm not clearer today - got prep for a new crown and I'm still a little woozy.

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)
55. He won't do that. You want him to do the work the aware public and the House needs to do. If he
Wed May 29, 2019, 04:53 PM
May 2019

did your bidding, bashed Barr, spit directly in Trump’s eye, stepped put of his professional role to attack the current administration, he’d be seen as partisan, his and team member’s work, tireless work tainted, and quite possibly cases overturned, evidence disputed. Just more muddle and chaos and division among Americans.

SunSeeker

(51,771 posts)
60. I don't want him to do "my bidding." I wanted him to do his job.
Wed May 29, 2019, 05:59 PM
May 2019

Or at least stop bending over backwards for Trump and Barr.

I don't want him to engage in an "unprofessional attack" on the current administration. I want him to state what he found. I want him to state what he was hired to determine and which he so obviously found but does not have the courage to say, namely, that TRUMP COMMITTED CRIMES.

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)
62. He just bent over backwards when he broke DOJ protocol by discussing the subject of an
Wed May 29, 2019, 07:08 PM
May 2019

investigation who has not been indicted. Read Alan Dershowitz’s column on Mueller’s misconduct today.

SunSeeker

(51,771 posts)
63. Mueller is a SPECIAL COUNSEL--required by law to write a report and "discuss the subject."
Wed May 29, 2019, 08:09 PM
May 2019

The DOJ/Barr released a redacted version of Mueller's report TO THE PUBLIC. Did Dershowitz object to that when it was released?
All Mueller said today about Trump was what was IN THE REPORT.

Please do not repeat Dershowitz' bullshit argument here as if it is valid.

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)
64. Dershowitz is not credible, but a shill. If you had the time and care to read what he said, or if
Wed May 29, 2019, 09:09 PM
May 2019

you had done your homework about DOJ protocol and the special prosecutor’s role, you would see that Dershowitz’s complaints reveals in what way Mueller parted with that established protocol today.

SunSeeker

(51,771 posts)
66. Dershowitz is sucking up to Trump for a SCOTUS appointment.
Wed May 29, 2019, 09:42 PM
May 2019

His Hill opinion piece is a pile of twisted shit. I have done my homework. Please stop insulting me. Dershowitz misleadingly uses the term special counsel and prosecutor as if they are the same thing. They are not.

Dershowitz' complaints don't "reveal" anything but his craven dishonesty. Mueller's statement today did not "part from established protocol" for a Special Counsel. His comments regarding Trump were merely repeated snippets, word for word, of the publicly released portions of his report, a report that he was required by law to write, unlike a normal prosecutor.

Beringia

(4,316 posts)
9. I looked over at Free Republic
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:08 PM
May 2019

They think Mueller is a traitor for not clearing Trump. They don't even mention the stolen election by the Russians.

highplainsdem

(49,060 posts)
13. Yep. And Giuliani and Dershowitz are already bitching about it. I've posted a couple of
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:10 PM
May 2019

threads with their reactions.

Response to malaise (Original post)

Eliot Rosewater

(31,131 posts)
31. Is it congress' job to find out if Barr shut him down prematlurely when Barr wont go before
Wed May 29, 2019, 02:50 PM
May 2019

congress or tell the fucking truth, ever?

No, it is MUELLER's job to tell us.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,131 posts)
36. I can think of a shit ton of questions to ask Mueller about what Barr did, Whitaker, about
Wed May 29, 2019, 03:08 PM
May 2019

the redacted part of the report etc.

This is bullshit, he MUST testify about ANYTHING our representatives want to ask him, he works FOR US!

sop

(10,274 posts)
45. When Trump finally realizes the full import of Mueller's damning statement today,
Wed May 29, 2019, 04:22 PM
May 2019

and he can no longer continue tweeting stupid shit proclaiming "no collusion!, no obstruction!" and "the case is closed," he'll probably start viciously attacking Mueller and his "17 angry Democrats" on twitter.

Mueller has been very circumspect up to this point, but he might see things differently after he's attacked by Trump and his henchmen on FOX News and social media. Call me crazy, but Mueller doesn't seem like the kind of guy Trump should f**k with.

malaise

(269,237 posts)
48. True but the public will begin realizing the full import of this report on
Wed May 29, 2019, 04:30 PM
May 2019

tonight's evening news and that's even worse for the Con.

It is the people who will discover the Barr/Con lies.
Mueller on tape carries lots of weight.
I agree with you - the Con should be wary of both Mueller and the folks he and his goons including Barr lied to big time.
Truth will out!!
I like what Mueller did today particularly the short notice about his press briefing.
Forget not that Barr is in Alaska - bet he was caught off guard.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mueller just nailed the C...