This is the most important question I have about the report that Mueller could answer.

[shockey80]

Who lied, destroyed evidence, that prevented you from bringing forth conspiracy charges. Mueller did not say in his report there was no evidence of conspiracy. He said, insufficient evidence.

I think it save to say Manafort was one of them. What about Gates and Stone? This is why Mueller should testify, so many questions have been left unanswered.

[TheRealNorth]

1. 100% agree

I would like to know if and where the obstruction of justice affected the investigation into Russian interference. Splitting the report into 2 parts seems to have made any links between the 2 less obvious.

[mudpuddle]

2. I am beginning to question Mueller's motives.

He always stops short of decisive action, then speaks out both sides of his mouth.

[Jersey Devil]

3. I would also ask Mueller if he would have recommended indictment to the GJ if Trump was not Pres

I know he will not answer that question because, as he explained, he believes it to be "unfair" to say that because since Trump cannot be tried, as a sitting President, he would have no way to establish his innocence. But I think that question is a fair one and one that Mueller should answer. Someone pardoned upon indictment but before trial also does not have any way to establish his innocence. Does that mean a pardon should never take place because it would unfairly taint the person's reputation?