Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So what can or should Judge Sullivan do in light of DOJ refusal to turn over documents? (Original Post) sarabelle May 2019 OP
Lock him up!! blueinredohio May 2019 #1
Hand out some jail time due to contempt of court. abqtommy May 2019 #2
He can find them in contempt of court and order fine or arrest. But arrest will be tricky StarfishSaver May 2019 #3
Same thing they do to corporations angrychair May 2019 #4
Don't see Sullivan doing that. ooky Jun 2019 #10
Apparently, you haven't been paying attention to Judge Sullivan StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #12
Issue. Snackshack May 2019 #5
Something fishy going on in DOJ. Need to know who is calling DOJ shots here. empedocles May 2019 #6
What would happen to you if you ignored a court order? world wide wally May 2019 #7
It's a pretty simple procedure. TomSlick May 2019 #8
Arrest Barr. triron Jun 2019 #9
It depends on whether they're classified or not. n/t pnwmom Jun 2019 #11
Off with his head! ProudLib72 Jun 2019 #13
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
3. He can find them in contempt of court and order fine or arrest. But arrest will be tricky
Fri May 31, 2019, 09:27 PM
May 2019

since the U.S. Marshals usually carry out enforcement, but the Marshals are actually part of DOJ, meaning the AG oversees them and he's not likely to allow the Marshals to arrest him or any of his attorneys.

It's likely that the Marshals will carry out the judge's order anyway since obeying the AG would mean they are defying a court order themselves. If they refuse, the judge can hold them in contempt, as well.

If the Marshals don't follow the judge's order, the judge could deputize someone outside of the executive branch to conduct the arrests.

But I have a feeling that the judge could find plenty of Marshals somewhere in the country who would be happy to make this arrest ...

I have no idea how this will play out. But it's a mess, isn't it?

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
6. Something fishy going on in DOJ. Need to know who is calling DOJ shots here.
Fri May 31, 2019, 09:34 PM
May 2019

Bluntly defy a judicial order? Not normal for practicing, real lawyers.

It sounds like mob boss trump said, "NO WAY"! Capo barr, with 'buffers', passed along 'the word'?

TomSlick

(11,120 posts)
8. It's a pretty simple procedure.
Fri May 31, 2019, 10:07 PM
May 2019

(1) The Judge asks the government lawyers who made the decision to not comply with the Court's order;
(2) Issue an order that the person identified in (1) appear and show cause why s/he should not be held in contempt;
(3) If that person does not appear as order, send the US Marshall to collect him or her;
(4) If the person does not convince the judge that s/he should not be held in contempt, order him/her jailed until the Court's order to provide the documents is obeyed.

See, easy-peasy.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
13. Off with his head!
Sat Jun 1, 2019, 01:08 AM
Jun 2019


I dunno. What's the maximum penalty and how quickly can it be enforced? I'd just like regular consequences to happen instead of letting it slide.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So what can or should Jud...