General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBloomberg Insider brands Reagan 'socialist'
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/08/bloomberg-insider-brands-reagan-socialist-133426.htmlA first look at the cover of tomorrow's Bloomberg Insider, branding Ronald Reagan a "socialist." (Full view.)
From the article:
His record tells a different story.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)The Republican party has gone from moderates like Ike, to hard conservatives like Reagan, to batshit crazies like we have now. To them, everything and everybody looks like a "socialist" though their liberal usage of the term simply shows that they have no clue what they're talking about).
The trouble is, the Democratic party has slid to the right with them, from enacting socialist policies to enacting moderately liberal policies to enacting center right policies.
The left has no voice in the corridors of power anymore.
snot
(10,524 posts)why shd we be ashamed to say so?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)nope, St. Reagan could not run today... in the republican party (I honestly doubt if he could in the Dem party either, we have gone that far right)
Poiuyt
(18,123 posts)He had that big tax cut his first year, but when he saw that it wasn't working, he started to raise taxes. I believe he did it every year but his first. His budget director, David Stockman, said that everyone in the White House was forbidden to call them tax increases. They came up with other names for them.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)Reagan was clever: he lowered tax rates while eliminating deductions and credits. What's clever about this is most far-right types think the rates are the only thing that determines how much tax you pay. If you were to take 500 teabaggers, tell them you were lowering tax rates by 10 percent, eliminate enough deductions to cause their taxes to go up by $500 per year, then ask them what happened to their taxes, every one of the 500 will tell you they got a tax cut. Guaranteed.