Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,095 posts)
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 10:35 AM Aug 2012

Frustrations of Air Travel Push Passengers to Amtrak





Long a punch line for harried Northeast travelers, Amtrak has come to dominate commercial travel in the corridor connecting Washington, New York and Boston, and this summer its trains are packed.

A decade ago, Delta and US Airways shuttles were the preferred mode of travel between the cities. But high fares, slow airport security and frequent flight delays — along with Amtrak’s high-speed Acela trains, online ticketing and workstation amenities — have eaten away at the airlines’ share of passengers.

Between New York and Washington, Amtrak said, 75 percent of travelers go by train, a huge share that has been building steadily since the Acela was introduced in 2000 and airport security was tightened after 2001. Before that, Amtrak had just over a third of the business between New York and Washington.

In the same period, Amtrak said, its market share between New York and Boston grew to 54 percent from 20 percent. .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.cnbc.com/id/48690841



20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frustrations of Air Travel Push Passengers to Amtrak (Original Post) marmar Aug 2012 OP
Travelers are fed up with the TSA and declining airline service. imho nt snappyturtle Aug 2012 #1
The last time I went through US airport security Art_from_Ark Aug 2012 #4
I know....it's demeaning. nt snappyturtle Aug 2012 #14
Great. Whatever strengthens the argument for trains is fine by me. nt onehandle Aug 2012 #2
We took the train from NY to WI. HappyMe Aug 2012 #3
For fun I went to the Amtrack website to plot a train trip. Gold Metal Flake Aug 2012 #5
That route planner is screwy Proud Public Servant Aug 2012 #9
You may have entered the wrong date KamaAina Aug 2012 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author kooljerk666 Aug 2012 #20
I don't fly unless I absolutely, positively, "there's no choice in the matter" HAVE to. HughBeaumont Aug 2012 #6
And, SoCalDem Aug 2012 #16
When I went to my grandfather's funeral in 2004 (in New Bern, N.C.) . . . . HughBeaumont Aug 2012 #17
I'm not so sure it has that much to do with air travel frustrations Major Nikon Aug 2012 #7
I absolutely believe this, but Proud Public Servant Aug 2012 #8
The Acela Is A Joy... KharmaTrain Aug 2012 #10
But everything you say Proud Public Servant Aug 2012 #11
Boutique vs. Retail... KharmaTrain Aug 2012 #12
What I really expect Proud Public Servant Aug 2012 #13
Shh TSA will hear you. n/t kickysnana Aug 2012 #18
Acela will be faster, after next round of improvements JPZenger Aug 2012 #19

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
4. The last time I went through US airport security
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 10:46 AM
Aug 2012

right there in Arkansas, I felt like I was being treated like a common criminal-- take off shoes, go into the "telephone booth" (after removing EVERYTHING from my pockets) to get a naked X-ray taken, then get frisked on the other side of the telephone booth. Then have my carry-on bag rechecked because it contained something that was made of metal (laptop battery). Argh.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
3. We took the train from NY to WI.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 10:46 AM
Aug 2012

It was great. Way, way cheaper than flying, way less hassle. All of the people working on board were pleasant and helpful. No asshats amongst the passengers either.

Gold Metal Flake

(13,805 posts)
5. For fun I went to the Amtrack website to plot a train trip.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 10:47 AM
Aug 2012

Thought maybe it would be fun to visit a relative in Florida. So I used the Buy Tickets thing and inputted LA Union Station to Jacksonville. It designed a trip that went up to Santa Barbara (2h, 35m), then over to Emeryville, Ca BY BUS (8h), then to Chicago (51h, 40m), then to Washington DC (17h, 30m), then down to Jacksonville 13h, 53m).

$533 coach.

Yeah, that's some fun traveling!

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
9. That route planner is screwy
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 11:48 AM
Aug 2012

I just played with it too, and noticed that it doesn't give you an option for a direct route between LA and New Orleans, even though those are the east and west terminal points for the Sunset Limited.

The problem is, once you get to New Orleans, there's no direct route to Florida. I'm pretty sure there used to be a New Orleans-Jacksonville line, but it looks like it no longer exists. So yeah, then the trip gets dopey; you have to go through DC to get to Florida.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
15. You may have entered the wrong date
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 07:27 PM
Aug 2012

Sunset Limited only runs three times a week.

Of course, that hardly bolsters the case for Amtrak.

Yep, the route from NOLA east to Fla. was knocked out in Katrina and has not been rebuilt -- seven years later.

Response to Gold Metal Flake (Reply #5)

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
6. I don't fly unless I absolutely, positively, "there's no choice in the matter" HAVE to.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 10:57 AM
Aug 2012

For example, if I go far West for whatever reason. Anything else, I just drive everywhere. Flying is now an inconvenient, uncomfortable and expensive pain in the ass that's not even worth it anymore.

Between

* the overbooked filled-to-capacity flights,
* the crying babies and toddlers,
* the seats that cannot accomodate an average 10-year-old girl,
* 90% of the time being surrounded by personal-space-clueless seatmates (almost always males) and full-recliners in the front (again, almost always males),
* the dank smell of sweat, B.O., bad breath and stale cigarettes,
* the TSA feel-ups and full-body scans,
* delays for whatever reason,
* long security lines,
* overcharging on bags,
* never being able to find a space for your bag because people take 2-4 medium suitcases with them on the flight
and most importantly, the expense (I can't get under $70 one way for a city that's 5.60 hours away by car) . . . I'd rather just DRIVE. In the case of Cleveland to DC, I'm actually paying less in gas and turnpike and the travel time isn't that much greater.

This Fall, I'm driving from Cleveland to Atlanta. Yes, I know, it's 12 hours. But you know what else? I'm saving $1,000 this way. I hate flying THAT much.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
16. And,
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 07:31 PM
Aug 2012

you can stop & stretch your legs, have a meal OF YOUR CHOICE whenever YOU want to..

And if you are in no hurry, you can take interesting side trips along the way that you never knew about, until you saw a billboard

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
17. When I went to my grandfather's funeral in 2004 (in New Bern, N.C.) . . . .
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 07:49 PM
Aug 2012

We had to drive from Silver Spring MD to New Bern, about six hours through Richmond . . . that had to be one of the most eye-opening drives ever. I had never seen a tobacco or cotton field until then. The roads had old dilapidated shacks from the 1800s, homes from the turn of the century and older, houses that doubled as small chapels, a Piggly Wiggly. There are some taken-for-granted sights in the South that read like art to a Northern guy's eyes.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
7. I'm not so sure it has that much to do with air travel frustrations
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 11:00 AM
Aug 2012

It just makes sense to go Acela for certain trips. It costs about $400-500 to fly from DC to NYC round trip. For $350 you can take the same trip on Acela and it only takes an hour more each way. It also drops you off in Manhattan vs one of the NYC area airports so for many people the time is about the same. The train is also roomier.

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
8. I absolutely believe this, but
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 11:14 AM
Aug 2012

it's hard to see how Acela plays a role; it's scarcely faster than the regular Northeast Corridor milk run (the difference between the two on a DC-NY trip is only 30 minutes), and generally costs at least twice as much. Put some real high-speed rail in -- say, something that could cover the 225 miles between DC and NY (with stops at Philly and the Newark airport) in under 2 hours, and we'll really be getting somewhere.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
10. The Acela Is A Joy...
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 12:06 PM
Aug 2012

I traveled from NYC to Philadelphia on the Acela a couple years ago. Instead of the long and expensive cab ride to JFK from Manhattan we just walked up the street to Penn Station and had an equally short distance to go from the 30th Street station to our Philly hotel. The lack of having to go through everything but an anal probe for security, no extra baggage (or now seat location) charges and plenty of leg room was very welcome on this end.

You are right, it's not a true high speed route yet...but if I'm on the east coast and have get from Point A to B, the Acela is going to be part of those plans. Here's hoping that the pressures of more people using train travel will put on the political pressure required to get high speed lines built along the Eastern corridor as well as here in the Midwest and the West Coast.

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
11. But everything you say
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 12:29 PM
Aug 2012

in your first paragraph is true of the Northeast Regional as well as the Acela: arrive downtown, no security hassle, no extra baggage charge, plenty of leg room (though I'm sure Acela has more, since it's all business class, but I'm a taller-than-average guy with bad knees and the leg room on the Northeast Regional is plenty for me).

As far as I can tell, the only thing the Acela really has going for it is reserve seating. Reserve seating is nice, but consider a trip I want to make up to NY on Oct. 22. I can take the 5:30 am Northeast Regional and arrive at 8:42, or I can take the 6:00 am Acela and arrive at 8:46. What's the price difference between those two tickets? $169 ($49 vs. $218). For that kind of money, I'll wake up a little early and find my own seat. (In fairness, the price difference narrows at other times of day, but it's always at least $80.)

Don't get me wrong, I love the train; I'm just seriously underwhelmed by Acela.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
12. Boutique vs. Retail...
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 12:40 PM
Aug 2012

I can understand why you're not overwhelemed and if I would take the earlier train at the lower rate as well. I imagine its also a combination of personal preference and timing...willing to pay more for a little faster or better seating. I'm not that particular.

I loathe airline travel...and hopefully more and more people are feeling the same way and this will give more political clout when it comes to funding all types of rail...

Cheers...

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
13. What I really expect
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 12:43 PM
Aug 2012

is that Acela riders are overwhelming riding on expense accounts rather than paying their own way. But yeah, couldn't agree more about air travel.

JPZenger

(6,819 posts)
19. Acela will be faster, after next round of improvements
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 10:36 PM
Aug 2012

A new set of improvements have been planned along the northeast corridor that will make Acela much faster. The train cannot run at high speeds along many segments because of track limitations.

Amtrak is usually great. However, on a Pittsburgh to Chicago all night train ride, they packed everyone into two cars with every seat filled, even though the train was 60 cars long and other cars were apparently empty. I didn't sleep a wink.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Frustrations of Air Trave...