Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney super pacs pulling their money out of Pennsylvania per Robert Gibbs (Original Post) upaloopa Aug 2012 OP
V. good sign (for us) I'd think. nt nc4bo Aug 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author fifthoffive Aug 2012 #3
I refuse to be that pessmistic... nc4bo Aug 2012 #11
PA is now a lost cause for Rmoney Panasonic Aug 2012 #2
Voter suppression is free, they can spend elsewhere... democrat_patriot Aug 2012 #4
I think there is more to it than that. BlueStreak Aug 2012 #6
Even with their voter supression efforts Cali_Democrat Aug 2012 #8
And there's no coordination with the campaign??? C_U_L8R Aug 2012 #5
Voter suppression has been ruled legal. Ruby the Liberal Aug 2012 #7
Even with Corbett's corruption of the voting process, rMoney still can't win here. He's toast. HopeHoops Aug 2012 #9
Their work is done. WilliamPitt Aug 2012 #10

Response to nc4bo (Reply #1)

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
11. I refuse to be that pessmistic...
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 06:30 PM
Aug 2012

Fuck the GOP and their voter suppression. People are working their butts off getting people registered - no way I'd be the one to tell those hard workers and volunteers to just hang it up, it's over, lost cause, complete waste your time..

Obama is going to take Pa.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
2. PA is now a lost cause for Rmoney
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:02 PM
Aug 2012

PA is to go blue, and take down Corbett and the rest of the bagging sleazes in PA.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
6. I think there is more to it than that.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:13 PM
Aug 2012

We have a horrible history of voter suppression in this country, and we must opposed that. But the reality is that the people they are targeting in PA are relatively unlikely to vote in any case. In other words, the numbers are probably overstated. When we say that as many as 750,000 might be affected, this probably translates to a distortion of 50,000 votes.

That is terrible. There shouldn't be ANY distortion. But my point is that they are pulling out because even fraud on the scale of 50,000 votes will not save them in PA.

I do seriously question their tactics. They have such a huge imbalance in money, I don't see where they gain an advantage by putting more of it in a smaller number of states. There comes a point where there is so much money going into advertising in, say , Virginia that another 10 million just won't help. It might even hurt if people get sick of seeing Romney's face.

What they may be doing is shifting from PA to Michigan. They had pretty much written Michigan off. But if they see Florida doing South of then, their only path to victory is to win PA, MI, or NH and sweep everything else. This may be a tactical decision that they can't win PA, but they think they might still have a shot at MI. Let's see if they ramp up the ad spend and campaign appearances in MI.

From here on out, it is all tactical.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
8. Even with their voter supression efforts
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:25 PM
Aug 2012

Romney and co. still will not have enough votes to win PA. It's out of reach for them.

Both Romney and Obama campaigns realize this. Only the media is trying to still make this a tossup for ratings $$$.

C_U_L8R

(45,020 posts)
5. And there's no coordination with the campaign???
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:04 PM
Aug 2012

sooner or later these crooks are gonna get caught with hard evidence.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
10. Their work is done.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 01:55 PM
Aug 2012

Just waiting for the PA Supreme Court to rule...and since that's a body split 3-3 along party lines (with the seventh judge abstaining), the ID law will likely be upheld, which means the appellate court ruling will stand. A SCOTUS review won't happen in time for November, and I'm not any more confident in the Supremes settling an election issue fairly than I was in 2000.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney super pacs pulling...