Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

sarabelle

(453 posts)
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 07:37 AM Jun 2019

So if a person was using an Iranian boat to remove an unexploded mine, does that mean Iran

was responsible for anything? What if the boat used had been an American boat? We would have said the US was trying to avoid further damage to the boat. And how many countries in the region have confiscated boats, weaponry etc from other countries?

I am still suspicious about these latest claims especially since Iran was at the time trying to seal a deal with the Japanese? It makes no sense.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So if a person was using an Iranian boat to remove an unexploded mine, does that mean Iran (Original Post) sarabelle Jun 2019 OP
It's like if something happend off the coast of Florida and the Russian Navy claimed water hegemony. TheBlackAdder Jun 2019 #1
Yes. Who could act as a properly neutral 'umpire' or 'referee' Ghost Dog Jun 2019 #2
We are being told it's an "Iranian" boat... Dennis Donovan Jun 2019 #3
This is the 2nd false flag operation, watoos Jun 2019 #4
there is a lot i don't like about this story rampartc Jun 2019 #5

TheBlackAdder

(28,182 posts)
1. It's like if something happend off the coast of Florida and the Russian Navy claimed water hegemony.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 07:40 AM
Jun 2019

.

An American ship tries to deactivate the mines, near their country, and Russia accuses the US of planting them.

.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
2. Yes. Who could act as a properly neutral 'umpire' or 'referee'
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 07:59 AM
Jun 2019

in the area?

Custody of any evidence would be crucial.

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
3. We are being told it's an "Iranian" boat...
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 08:15 AM
Jun 2019

In the era of deepfakes, the video shown could be completely manufactured for all we know.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
4. This is the 2nd false flag operation,
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 08:16 AM
Jun 2019

Saudi Arabia, the US, the UAE, and Bibi will continue with these false flag operations to justify war with Iran.

By the way, Assad gassing his own people was also a false flag operation. He did plenty of brutal inhumane things to his people but he didn't do the gas thingy. Removing Assad was all about gas and oil pipelines.

rampartc

(5,400 posts)
5. there is a lot i don't like about this story
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 08:18 AM
Jun 2019

a ship's captain does not allow unknown boats to get too close.

but it is obvious that someone wants a war with iran - maybe its trump, maybe his neocon staff, maybe Israel or Saudi arabia. all are know liars. why should I believe them?

if congress declares war I shall continue to recycle, conserve, and cultivate my victory garden. if not, i'm not interested.

"fool we once shame on me, fool me twice I won't get fooled again." g w bush

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So if a person was using ...