Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SHRED

(28,136 posts) Tue Jul 9, 2019, 12:19 AM Jul 2019

1

Why aren't Epstein's "employees" under indictment?

The people that knew what he was doing but were accomplices?

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why aren't Epstein's "employees" under indictment? (Original Post) SHRED Jul 2019 OP

Yet. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2019 #1

He's the big p***k. elleng Jul 2019 #2

How do you know they are not? sheshe2 Jul 2019 #3

Because they don't have the resources to flee like Epstein does. n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2019 #4

The reason they weren't originally is because of an NPA that has been called completely irregular emmaverybo Jul 2019 #5

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)

1. Yet.

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Tue Jul 9, 2019, 12:24 AM

Jul 2019

Maybe they're talking to prosecutors so they won't be indicted.

elleng

(130,895 posts)

2. He's the big p***k.

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Tue Jul 9, 2019, 12:24 AM

Jul 2019

sheshe2

(83,751 posts)

3. How do you know they are not?

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Tue Jul 9, 2019, 12:26 AM

Jul 2019

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)

4. Because they don't have the resources to flee like Epstein does. n/t

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Tue Jul 9, 2019, 12:35 AM

Jul 2019

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)

5. The reason they weren't originally is because of an NPA that has been called completely irregular

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Tue Jul 9, 2019, 02:32 AM

Jul 2019

according to law. So his lawyers got an agreement from feds that none of his creepy peep
enablers, some of whom were hands on in his sex crimes, would be prosecuted.

Where that stands now? I don’t know. I would think that whole agreement torn up.

One of our threads led me to a YouTube video with a good run-down on Epstein, the old case, the new.

It has “St. James” in the title. Sorry can’t credit.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why aren't Epstein's "emp...