General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGA -new details on the state actually destroying evidence --- including computer servers, databases
and voting system memory cards.
GA's 2018 Election Was '100% Outsourced to Three People in a Garage': 'BradCast' 7/29/2019
Guest: Marilyn Marks of Coalition for Good Governance
https://bradblog.com/?p=13078
SNIP
Marks shares a number of remarkable updates in the case we've been following since she filed it back in 2017. The updates include new details on the state actually destroying evidence --- including computer servers, databases and voting system memory cards --- needed in the case, and lies told to the court by the defendants about security issues related to the voting system. The misleading statements came from the office of Georgia's Republican Sec. of State Brad Raffensberger and the state's former GOP Sec. of State Brian Kemp. Kemp is now Governor of the state, after he is said to have narrowly defeated popular Democrat Stacey Abrams last November on the very same unverifiable computer voting systems overseen at the time by then SoS Kemp.
Marks details the extraordinary security measures plaintiffs were forced to undergo in order to have their experts even partially examine the ballot database used by Georgia which, the state had claimed, included customized, "super-secret" security measures built in to the system that made it completely different from identical --- and completely hackable --- Diebold touchscreen systems used elsewhere in the country. As it turns out, after spending thousands of dollars to create secure "clean rooms" at Georgia's insistence to allow plaintiffs' experts to examine the databases in two different locations (Michigan and Washington, D.C.) those experts found there was, in fact, no special customized "super-secret" security measures. The database structures are identical to those found available for download on the Internet --- from many different states --- going back as early as 2002, when Georgia first adopted their current, easily-manipulated voting systems.
"Let's be clear that we've still not had a chance to look at the system or the programming in the voting machines or the servers," she told me. "We were allowed to look at a database that is used to program the memory cards, just one tiny piece. There was a huge fight because the state lied to the judge, and lied to us, and said that this database was its 'crown jewel' of security, [that] nobody else using Diebold had this super-secret database."
"We found out that, just as we had told the court, their database is just like every other state's database, many of them published on the Internet as public records. They just found it so convenient to lie to the court in order to keep anyone from having easy access to see what a mess they're making," she says.
On the destruction of evidence, she tells me: "The Secretary of State destroyed their two primary servers --- the first one four days after we sued them, the next one a few hours after the case was assigned to Judge Totenberg. From there, we asked to start preserving memory cards, internal memories of the voting machines themselves, and they just completely defied every request. Even the judge told them to go to the FBI, where there was a partial copy of one of the servers, and be sure that thing did not disappear, be sure it was retained, and they even refused to do that."
She also details a revelation from one of the witnesses on the stand last week which elicited gasps in the courtroom after he admited that "100%" of Georgia's ballots are programmed by three independent contractors who do not work for the state and who prepare the ballots at home --- on potentially unprotected WiFi setups. That, despite the extraordinary --- and expensive --- measures plaintiffs were forced to enact in order just to have their experts view the state's "super-secret" election system database.
SNIP
-------------------
Audio interview with Marilyn Marks as well at:
https://bradblog.com/audio/BradCast_BradFriedman_TrumpStochasticTerror_GilroyShooting_MarilynMarks-GALiesSpoilation_072919.mp3 (starts at 18:10)
------------------
For the doubters who say 'no votes were flipped '-- why would you give the benefit of the doubt to rethugs who destroy evidence before it can be examined by the plaintiffs???????
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)diva77
(7,640 posts)I hope people will contribute $$ to the cause -- this is one of the most important things taking place right now and legal expenses are very costly.
https://www.coalitionforgoodgovernance.org/
https://fairfight.com/
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)unless something drastically changes, the only fair elections will be in the blue states. Everywhere else, from purple to red will be suspect.
triron
(22,003 posts)diva77
(7,640 posts)2004 election recount at the Green Party Ohio website.
It would be interesting to see a compilation of such info.
triron
(22,003 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)diva77
(7,640 posts)PufPuf23
(8,776 posts)BradBlog has provided journalism (however imperfect) on voting issues when more MSM has lacked sufficient coverage on voting system issues.
Please name other sources that you deem better on voting issues.
I ask this in a positive sense.
questionseverything
(9,654 posts)but gj trying to distract from the fact that Georgia acted illegally before voting machines could actually be examined
diva77
(7,640 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Then again, probably not...
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)paleotn
(17,913 posts)I think an asterisk is in order. The fix was in in Georgia. Stacey Abrams is the rightful governor of the peach state.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)Just like we knew
Probably Andrew Gulliam in Florida
and maybe even Beto over cruz
Duppers
(28,120 posts)Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,345 posts)The Gangsters Of Putin want to eliminate elections.
BadgerMom
(2,771 posts)dhill926
(16,339 posts)Jesus christ...
diva77
(7,640 posts)the issue; the evidence is elusive; the perpetrators have big money & influence. And worst of all, there is a weakness in our legal system -- elections officials have access to unlimited legal power, while citizens have to foot the bill for challenges and recounts.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Wasn't it '04 here in Ohio where an election was overturned after showing problems with the diebold machines in the district flipping votes?
Kemp directly oversaw the election he was running in, won closely, lied about the databases, outsourced to some questionable garage programmers, lied to the court, and destroyed as much evidence as possible. Every single thing about this race looks like blatant election fraud.
diva77
(7,640 posts)This article is a must-read for doubters:
https://columbusfreepress.com/article/diebold-indicted-its-spectre-still-haunts-ohio-elections