General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEpstein accuser named former governor, senator in testimony: prosecutors
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/456923-epstein-accuser-named-former-governor-senator-in-testimony-prosecutorsAccording to court documents made public Friday, Virginia Giuffre testified in 2016 she was also sent to have sex with asset manager Glenn Dubin, modeling executive Jean Luc Brunel and the late MIT scientist Marvin Minsky, expanding on past claims that she was used as a sex slave for Epstein from 2000 to 2002.
This is going to get interesting.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)businessmen and politicians (both sides) are sweating profusely right now about what will be coming out.
Epstein had many women that were his "sex slaves"....it wasn't just Virginia Giuffre....
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)I always liked him. But now? Ew. Hope, if it's true, he gets locked up too.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)...great things and were well liked...but they were also simultaneously engaging in raping minors.
Its very hard sometime to wrap your brain around how someone can be "so good" and then "so bad"....the duality.
mopinko
(70,102 posts)iirc that is what sunk his presidential bid in '08.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Even without any hint of scandal, he wasn't going to beat Hillary or Obama. Thing is, he was vetted to be Obama's VP, as well as rumored to be SoS before it was offered to Hillary, so, the rumors must not have been that significant.
Metatron
(1,258 posts)UTUSN
(70,691 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)They could have legal aged women if they wanted that. Underaged girls turn them on more.
UTUSN
(70,691 posts)These TO ME were *names* that meant some kind of "reputation" to me, not in the league of FDR to get me to jump from my chair at attention, but somebody to be respected.
Am not going to be surprised about the rest of the ones who haven't been released yet.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I was speaking of the general problem of people having sex with underaged partners, regardless of the circumstances. It is perversion.
UTUSN
(70,691 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)He just came off as too much of a smoozer. But if Mitchell is somehow involved, that would be massively disappointing, I have always held him in high regard.
UTUSN
(70,691 posts)when I didn't know who OBAMA was. When that primary was over, I became a bigger OBAMA booster than what it appeared his original supporters were. But the subject is RICHARDSON, never a star for me, just what I thought was a reliable Dem. So I was just perplexed about him. Then this/whatever/goodbye (to him, not you).
zackymilly
(2,375 posts)Richardson, Mitchell and Dershowitz have all denied her allegations.
RockRaven
(14,966 posts)instead of saying "If true, the accused should be indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced."
Deplorables are going to come at us with every Democratic name that gets mentioned in connection with Epstein as if that somehow lets the Repukes off the hook. Don't put up with that. Point out that the difference between them and us is we think ALL the child rapists should've been in jail, and don't give a shit which party they are in.
JI7
(89,249 posts)Polybius
(15,411 posts)The only reason there might be more Democrats named is because he was a Democratic donor. Still, Epstein seemed to have not been partisan. He hung out with Republicans (Trump) too.
Raine
(30,540 posts)I don't care what party they belong to I want each and everyone of them exposed!