Romney's calculating a net number of jobs for Obama, and isn’t calculating a net number for himself
from Greg Sargent at WaPo: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/the-morning-plum/2012/01/04/gIQAGpyJaP_blog.html
Post writer Glenn Kesler pressed Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom to justify the 100,000 jobs assertion, and he offers this:
Fehrnstrom says the 100,000 figure stems from the growth in jobs from three companies that Romney helped to start or grow while at Bain Capital: Staples (a gain of 89,000 jobs), The Sports Authority (15,000 jobs), and Dominos (7,900 jobs).
This tally obviously does not include job losses from other companies with which Bain Capital was involved and are based on current employment figures, not the period when Romney worked at Bain.
Got that? Romney is only counting jobs gained at companies restructured at Bain during and after his years there and is not factoring in jobs lost in claiming he created over 100,000 jobs.
Meanwhile, as the Romney camp concedes to Kessler, in making the claim Obama is a job destroyer, Romney is factoring in the jobs that were lost during Obamas presidency before Obamas policies went into effect. In other words, Romney is calculating a net number for Obama, and isnt calculating a net number for himself. Just wow. As the charts drawn up by Steve Benen and Paul Krugman show, if you apply to Obama the metric Romney is applying to himself, around 2.3 million jobs were created on Obamas watch.
read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/romney-vs-obama-on-job-creation/2012/01/03/gIQA31g3YP_blog.html