General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAny one notice the lack of tattoos in Woodstock crowd photos?
Were we smarter back in those days?
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Weve become a nation of fat.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)And everyone still smoked like chimneys.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)We were all slim.
Yes, we were all very active folks too, not labor so much, but very involved in sports, being outside, not sitting on the couch all effing day.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)They were basically out of doors running, jumping, playing tag, playing "tackle the guy with the football", "Red Rover", "Snatch the Bacon", swimming, bicycling; playing basketball, baseball--from dawn's early rise to the time the streetlamps started going out in the neighborhood, about the time when their parents would stand out on the front porch to call out for them to come home.
Activity levels in childhood make a huge difference going into adulthood. Going outside to play is a major part of that.
sdfernando
(4,929 posts)I've never heard of that one.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)A flag, baton, whatever, is set in the middle between both teams.
Each person on each team has a number. These are designated oppositely--so that, say, 1 lines up across from 23, 22 from 2, 21 from 3, etc...
A number is called out. Both people with that number run out, try to grab the "bacon" (flag, baton, whatever) and run back to their own side without their counterpart on the other side stopping them.
TheRealNorth
(9,475 posts)We used bowling pins as the bacon.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)Using a dive weight.
Those were good times.
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)a) sitting in a circle passing a joint isn't exactly cardio; and
b) weed does not predispose one to hard physical labour...
highplainsdem
(48,959 posts)not hours spent staring at a computer/tablet/phone. And there were only a few channels/networks to watch so there was often nothing worth watching on TV.
People would go out to see others to socialize, not just text them or use social media.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Do you know what one of the most common additives in preserved food is?
Sugar.
Sugar is added to bolster the other flavors and aromas. Added sugar is everywhere.
A few calories here, a few calories there, and all of a sudden there is an obesity epidemic.
Johnny2X2X
(19,024 posts)People still look at obesity as a character flaw. Sugar is the problem. It's highly addictive and tricks the body into storing fat for no reason.
The people at Woodstock were not much more active than most people today, in fact going to the gym or even jogging/running weren't even popular things back in the 60s. The difference is diet, period.
And it snowballs, once a kid is addicted to sugar he or she adds weight which makes it harder to exercise.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Sugar is in EVERYTHING. Yuck.
Johnny2X2X
(19,024 posts)It's shocking to learn that 100% fruit juice might not be healthy because the fiber has been removed. Sugar is sugar, once your body is addicted to it, even natural sugars can be harmful in excess.
Scientists determined if they got mice addicted to cocaine and sugar at the same time, they'd choose sugar over cocaine when they could only have 1.
Imagine being addicted to cocaine and everyday you walked past hundreds of signs for cocaine, everyday you were offered cocaine dozens of times a day and things you had to ingest you had to double check that cocaine wasn't in them. And in some cases things that you ate would have labels that lie about cocaine being in them or not. It would be impossible to stay clean. People are literally dying of sugar addiction. The country is in big trouble healthy wise.
Farmer-Rick
(10,151 posts)I'm old, and could have gone to Woodstock....if my parents would of let a pre teen drive their truck.
And we rarely ate things like potatoes chips, Fritos and Pringles. We had them but only got them as a special treat, maybe 3 to 4 times a year. The same with things like ice cream and soda. Only Mom was allowed to drink coke and you better not touch it. We had to drink milk direct from the dairy, water from a spring fed well and sugar free teas.
About 3 times a year Mom would bake pies and cakes and homemade bread. But it was all special treats that most of the time we never ate. And then I grew up and realized I could eat all the junk food I wanted.
I'm still trying to lose the weight.
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)by the industrial-sized bag.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)While no one thing is to blame for our collective overweight, that's a significant part.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)before heading for the showers. This was high school 5 days a week.
Our GA grandson in 8th grade has no PE -- it's an elective and he's going for a full scholarship and says he needs all academics. In all of HS, he'll be required to take 2 sessions of PE, but it can be taken in the summer as a compressed elective for $500. Meanwhile in AR, it's much the same;
our grandsons' parents are paying a fortune for private after-school classes in athletic toning and training, in addition to organized sports. Nice for already athletically oriented kids whose parents can afford it.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Im grateful now.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)MuseRider
(34,104 posts)blue jumpers? Yeah, we ran too. We also ran as a punishment.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)And in another school baggy blue shorts with white blouses that never stayed tucked. How they managed to make beautiful young bodies look so dumpy was truly inspired.
zeusdogmom
(990 posts)Ugly as sin
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)going on 50 years. I must have blocked them for most of that. Ours were quite possibly from the same manufacturer.
zeusdogmom
(990 posts)In truth hadn't thought about that lovely gym wear in many years. Probably last time 25+ years ago when my girls complained about their required P.E. uniforms - green t-shirts, black shorts.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)ChazII
(6,204 posts)zeusdogmom
(990 posts)MuseRider
(34,104 posts)rather than being interested. They got shorts and long tee shirts. I have no idea why they made us wear those things. We had to take ours home to wash at the end of the week but they boys got theirs washed at school. Bad time to be a girl in a lot of ways.
stuffmatters
(2,574 posts)beveeheart
(1,369 posts)we had to wear.
MuseRider
(34,104 posts)LOL.
dchill
(38,465 posts)...permanently ruined my knees.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)for years before jumping jacks.
Handsprings were my downfall, just couldn't get the spring consistently right. A mean PE teacher (were there any other kind?) made me keep trying until I landed on my left shoulder, and it was never right after that (no obligatory lawsuit-driven orthopedist checks in those days, and "physical therapy" was standing and watching everyone else). But I'm able to scratch my back with my right hand, so okay. Definitely better than ruined knees.
dchill
(38,465 posts)...especially back in the sixties, when I was in their grasp. A lot of them were overweight chain smokers, too. Always chomping at the bit for a smoke, which probably explains much of their attitude.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)with short easy-care cuts. Looking back, they packed a lot of whistle-blowing and orders into each hour, some smokers seems likely for those days, but I never saw that much frailty when I was there.
llmart
(15,536 posts)where someone would hold your legs down at the ankles while you were supposed to do situps. If you got a friend to do it and they counted, they would sometimes cheat and tell the PE teacher, "Yeah, she did 50."
I could never manage getting up the rope. I don't think I ever got more than three feet up. And yet I was a very active, sports person. Just didn't have the right body type for rope climbing.
We had the blue, one-piece suits also.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)EVERYONE had to do it at their pace, even if they run-walked. There was always a competition within the different groups to see who in a particular group finished first. Of course the more athletic kids finished first overall, but everyon had fun.
When I reached high school, mandatory PE had been stopped, replaced by an hour "break" where kids did whatever they wanted except leave campus or have sex on campus. If kids chose to go running, they could but needed to be done and ready for class within an hour, no one bothered.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and makeup? Missing whatever those you hung with were up to? This was adolescence after all.
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)In jr high, I was an overweight and had issues with gynecomastia. Not the only one. The solution was nearly daily skin shirt basketball in PE class, which should be called "body shaming nightmare hour." The coaches never stopped it, if anything they egged it on. My self esteem was in the toilet til after I got to adulthood, and I still have body image issues. Miserable experience.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)So unfortunate. At least a lot of kids are spared that these days, and that's a very good thing.
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)Kids can't learn right in an environment like that.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)I've repressed most of it. I remember running around a lot and endless games of fucking dodgeball, while "Coach" sat in the bleachers reading the newspaper and smoking a cigarette.
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)I took a class called "individual and dual sports" in high school. The teacher would throw some dodgeballs in the gym and go plan her basketball games for her girls teams. The, the football players would tske all the dodgeballs and slam them at the little guys. This was called "suck ball." Ya know, I learned very little about exercise and healthy activity in school. The coaches and teachers just didn't care and weren't required to.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)ALL of it outside the purview of the school system, of course.
Junior high was especially bad, because kids start maturing at different rates. We had monsters with full beards throwing balls as hard as they could at little pipsqueaks like me.
What was funny was going to my ten-year high school reunion. I didn't stop growing until I was in college. All of those guys who seemed so formidable to me in the ninth grade were about a foot shorter than me, all with beer guts. They were A LOT nicer to me then!
consider_this
(2,203 posts)of yore.
argh!
every year - so embarrassing if you could not make the cut - or get the special patch.
Another way to make kids in the old days hate gym.
Iwasthere
(3,158 posts)I ate a whole food diet, and nearly everything was organic then too. Fewer gut problems as well, so our immune systems were really strong (cancer connection).
Johnny2X2X
(19,024 posts)In the 80s they took fat out of everything and replaced it with sugar. The agricultural lobby knows this means bigger profits, they have the government on lock down.
Ever wonder why on the side of any food product it says Daily recommended allowance next to everything save for sugar? Next to sugar it's left blank, politicians and people at the FDA tried to get this populated, but the lobby shut them down. 25 grams daily, an adult is supposed to get 25 grams of sugar each day. The agriculture lobby knows people would change their eating habits and it would effect profits if people read the side of their food and saw 24% of daily recommended sugar per serving on the side of their coffee creamer, or 90% on the side of their kid's cereal, or 260% in a 20 oz bottle of coca cola.
If you drink 1 single 20 oz coke, you have taken in your daily recommended amount of sugar for over 2-1/2 days.
SUGAR SUGAR SUGAR is the problem!
Even Michelle Obama when she first became First Lady succumbed to the pressure from the lobby, she started out talking about sugar and diet and changed it to mostly exercise. In other words. "It's you're fault you're obese, the food industry hiding the facts about sugar in your diet has nothing to do with it.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Nah.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)Nah.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)My dad got an anchor on his forearm, but was always trying to hide it years later.
Tats weren't big back then.
Submariner
(12,503 posts)had to get his forearm tattoos removed to become commissioned.
It looked like someone took razors and sliced and diced the surface tissue of his arms. Whatever the method of removal was, it was a truly mangled look with a lot of scarring.
TeamPooka
(24,218 posts)In 1969 I feel like everybody that I knew or saw that had a tattoo had been in the service or was a biker
spanone
(135,816 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Anyway I dont associate hippie Woodstock types with tattoos
I was thinking the same. The Bikers had tats then but not the Peace and Love people.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Some Truckers had 'em too ...
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)That's how a lot of the clubs got started vets from Korea buying surplus motorcycles
.
hunter
(38,309 posts)He had the requisite tattoos.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)in many cities, tattoo parlors weren't even legal then. The only places you could easily get tattoos were the military (mainly in foreign countries) or prison. Personally, I think they're hideous, but to each his own.
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)had been in prison until her grandkids started getting them.
lapfog_1
(29,199 posts)tattoos were thought to be either for WWII vets (the parents of the woodstockers) or for bikers and biker gangs.
In addition, the people who did tattoos in that time frame weren't the best artists or the cleanest places in the world... and while this was well before AIDs, there were blood transmitted disease so it was considered dangerous to get tattoos.
highplainsdem
(48,959 posts)often get the tattoos while drunk.
mopinko
(70,071 posts)marybourg
(12,609 posts)of them now.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Really, people so badly want to be seen as cool nowadays.
Kinda sad.
lame54
(35,281 posts)Soon everyone will be tatted up and I'll be the true individual
cwydro
(51,308 posts)When I was in my 30s in Key West, many of my co-workers had tats. Many of my co-workers were also the age I am now.
I remember thinking, oh no, never never never.
tinrobot
(10,893 posts)To be cool back then, you grew your hair long, went to shows like Woodstock, and looked down on people in business suits.
A decade later, you cut your hair short, went to punk rock shows, and looked down on hippies.
In the 90's, you got tattoos and wore flannel...
It never ends. Each decade may be different, but there are always people who try to be cool.
misanthrope
(7,411 posts)There's a lot of condescension in this thread. Some of it sounds pretty narrow-minded, too.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)to put down people younger than themselves - even if they have to lie outright to do it.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)I am an old man. This has gone on for generations, centuries.
But I don't remember a time where you needed to have permanent pictures inscribed, willy nilly, on your body in order to seem like the greatest, "coolest" thing.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Seems legit.
nocoincidences
(2,218 posts)didn't get tattoos which is why ex-military guys were embarrassed about the ones they picked up on drunken shore leave/R&R.
And as was said in another post, tattoo parlors weren't nice places to go, either.
no_hypocrisy
(46,067 posts)hlthe2b
(102,200 posts)sorry to the tattoo-obsessed, but, I am not among you.
littlemissmartypants
(22,629 posts)that they destroy sweat glands. The more tats, the more difficult it is to regulate body temperature.
diva77
(7,639 posts)your latest tatoo is less than 12 mos. old. https://www.healthline.com/health/can-you-donate-blood-if-you-have-a-tattoo
littlemissmartypants
(22,629 posts)My doctor told me.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)They got them on the small of their back just above their bottoms.
rampartc
(5,400 posts)obamanut2012
(26,064 posts)You didn't see any because the no tattoo attitude was classist, as only military and "low class" people got them, and even most "low class" women never did.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Link?
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)(an anchor on one arm, apparently)
Vinca
(50,255 posts)Maybe it's an age thing. Or a Daffy Duck thing.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)Vinca
(50,255 posts)bluedigger
(17,086 posts)But he also died on a glacier, so I guess the jury is still out on any tie between tattoos and intelligence.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)They missed the arrowhead the first time they did a forensic exploration on him. It was lodged in his upper torso between his shoulder and chest, close to his armpit.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Otherwise, everybody would have a go.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)I still grieve for Otzi!
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)My bad.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Maybe he ran into an opposing tribe or got seperated from a hunting or war party and got attacked by members of another tribe. Or maybe he had an illness and superstition led his tribe to take him out and murder him.
Fritz Walter
(4,291 posts)Its a generational thing, although some señors(!) have gotten into body art, including ink and piercings. Im just not one of them. Whatever.
I try not to judge.
Except when it comes to skill/technique. These days, when someone comes at me with a needle, their task is typically drawing blood, not injecting ink (nor leaving a permanent hole somewhere). Decades ago, I was a phlebotomist, so I know the difference between a good prep and a quick swipe with an alcohol swab. And dog forbid they miss the mark. Or leave a bruise.
Then there are all the jokes/memes about what happens to body-art when decades take their toll (hair-growth, loss of skin/muscle tone).
maxsolomon
(33,284 posts)So no, we weren't smarter.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)It was a young adult thing more than anything else. I was a college educated engineer and lots of the older engineers had mustaches or beards.
demmiblue
(36,838 posts)What a strange question.
Celerity
(43,280 posts)virgogal
(10,178 posts)quickesst
(6,280 posts)....are nothing more than graffiti for the human body. Nothing against graffiti. Tastefully done, I think it's an improvement and looks great on the side of a railroad boxcar or an ugly building. The human body is neither of these. Of course, like everyone else here, it's an opinion.
Thekaspervote
(32,752 posts)quickesst
(6,280 posts)True Dough
(17,301 posts)I've made an appointment with the tattoo removal place. I'm going to get "Ernesto" erased from my chest on Thursday.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Any young person that is thinking about getting a tattoo should view Tats on old people first.
LiberalFighter
(50,856 posts)Unlike more of the non-sociable types that have it all over their face and/or body.
soryang
(3,299 posts)...who reviewed disability claims in the late eighties. He regarded tattoos as a sign of personality disorder. When I questioned him because it wasn't in the DSM, he just said "it's a red flag." he didn't use it explicitly in his written opinion but would search harder for signs of a personality disorder to deny the disability claims for acquired psychiatric disorders.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)We hope the vast majority of people in mental health professions are capable, smart and dont let their prejudices get in the way, but trust me, there are some beuts in the field. Humans. What are ya gonna do?
soryang
(3,299 posts)it was so political really, it was ridiculous. In my observation mostly republicans did this. They viewed disability claimants as "parasites."
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)Things were different back then.
jmowreader
(50,552 posts)Today is different: there's a reason a tattoo shop smells like a doctor's office. You are FAR more likely to get an infection in the hospital than you are from a tattoo.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)so I had no tattoos. I love the ones I have now though and plan to get more.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)Might not be your cuppa, but its merely style.
johnp3907
(3,730 posts)Brilliant.
delisen
(6,042 posts)Tattoes imply forever; face painting is transient.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)jkirch
(256 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)I guess I'd rather have a tattoo.
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)17 first cousins were both Boomers and Hippies and on the liberal Democrat end of the spectrum. We resided in and around Boston, NY, DC, Atlanta, Miami, Seattle and LA and the large majority are Democrats.
Don't know why this Boomers for Reagan theme is circulating of late.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Denying that is futile, IMO. For more that a few hippies, it was about free sex and drugs, there was no profound goal driving their participation, it was all about getting laid then stoned, or vice-versa. I came of age after that generation and for decades have been appalled by what they became.
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)pstokely
(10,525 posts)tRump wasn't at Woodstock
PatrickforO
(14,569 posts)it seems like a whole bunch sold out.
The two biggest illusions that plague us are the lust for wealth and the lust for power. I think all of us get tempted, but some resist. Some succumb.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)Don't I know it.
Okay.
It's not a theme. It's a fact. Reagan won Boomer-age voters in 1980 and 1984, that's all.
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)Reagan coalition, From Wikipedia
The Reagan coalition was the combination of voters that Republican Ronald Reagan assembled to produce a major political realignment with his electoral landslide in the 1980 United States presidential election. In 1980, the Reagan coalition was possible because of Democrat Jimmy Carter's losses in most social-economic groups. In 1984, Reagan confirmed his support by winning nearly 60% of the popular vote and carried 49 of the 50 states.
> The Reagan Democrats were Democrats before the Reagan years and afterwards, but who voted for Reagan in 1980 and 1984 and for George H. W. Bush in 1988, producing their landslide victories.
> They were mostly white socially conservative blue-collar workers who lived in the Northeast and were attracted to Reagan's social conservatism on issues such as abortion and to his hawkish foreign policy.
They did not continue to vote Republican in 1992 or 1996, so the term fell into disuse except as a reference to the 1980s. The term is not generally used to describe the Southern whites who permanently changed party affiliation from Democrat to Republican during the Reagan administration and they have largely remained Republican to this day.
Stan Greenberg, a Democratic pollster, analyzed white, largely unionized auto workers in suburban Macomb County, Michigan, just north of Detroit. The county voted 63% for John F. Kennedy in 1960 and 66% for Reagan in 1984. He concluded that Reagan Democrats no longer saw Democrats as champions of their middle class aspirations, but instead saw it as being a party working primarily for the benefit of others, especially African Americans and the very poor. Democrat Bill Clinton targeted the Reagan Democrats with considerable success in 1992 and 1996. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_coalition
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)Including boomers, who broke for him!
progressoid
(49,968 posts)New York Times
November 5 1984
This year it appears that many in this generation plan, like Mr. Merrick, to vote for President Reagan. According to the last four New York Times/ CBS News Polls, 54 percent of the voters aged 27 to 38 favor Mr. Reagan, while 37 percent back Walter F. Mondale. Only the smaller segment of the electorate aged 18 to 26 gives Mr. Reagan a bigger share of their support.
Economic Self-Interest
The polls indicate that Mr. Reagan's appeal is primarily economic in nature. In one recent Times/CBS News Poll, two-thirds of those 27 to 38 years old said the economy was the ''most important'' issue influencing their vote, a proportion well above other age groups.
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/11/05/us/making-mark-on-politics-baby-boomers-appear-to-rally-around-reagan.html
Los Angeles Times
August 8, 1988
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-08-18-mn-778-story.html
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)the election of Reagan and Bush close up, and endured the reign for 12 long years.
pstokely
(10,525 posts)of RW hate radio and Faux state news, or maybe they just poseurs in the 60s?
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)We live in a white hegemony; people who grow up in it must work hard to dismantle their own internal racism, and many don't make the effort. Some figure being not-racist is enough, when we need to be actively anti-racist.
Docreed2003
(16,858 posts)Signed a Gen Xer with Tattoos
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Not sure if thats something in which one should take pride, but what do I know?
Croney
(4,657 posts)A tiny butterfly on one breast, and that sucker flies lower and lower every year.
A vine around one ankle, with leaves and little flowers.
For my 75th birthday on 11/11 I'm getting three little birds around the vine.
Whether I'm smart or not has always been a subject for debate.
demmiblue
(36,838 posts)Croney
(4,657 posts)demmiblue
(36,838 posts)PufPuf23
(8,764 posts)Your tattoos are darn near perfect.
I am male, nearly 67, and identify with hippiedom and have no tattoos (nor piercing).
Took me awhile to find any tattoo attractive but tattoos have turned into something many people do (not just enlisted military, bikers, and those who have spent too much time in jail).
I love rock and roll after all these years.
elocs
(22,565 posts)fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)If the parents had tattoos, the kids found them distasteful. If the parents don't, then the kids find them shocking and cool.
Slightly off topic, Opiates are similar. Opiate addiction is about every third generation. Just long enough for the society to forget how devastating it is.
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)pstokely
(10,525 posts)that's what turns off kids from tattoos
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)stopbush
(24,395 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)stopbush
(24,395 posts)in 20-30 years when they try to have them removed.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)My position on tattoos and tattoo removal is that if you don't want a bad headache, don't hit yourself upside the head with a brick.
Retrograde
(10,132 posts)so I always associate them with very old people. (He got them when he was in the navy). They seem to have gone out of fashion in the 1920s, and didn't start being fashionable again until the 1990s.
I occasionally see some that I think are well done and are still well-defined. Mostly they tend to look somewhat grungy as they age, especially the sleeve-style ones. But it's not my body, so I say nothing.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)My adage is if nature didn't give your body something, you should not either. Inking healthy skin cells is an example of defiling nature, IMO.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Some make people look like idiots and some are living art. Few things are so simple that they can be described in one word.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)We were not friends, so the shirt taking off was weird enough.
The tat was a back size reproduction of the twin towers burning. I really had no words. It was horrific.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)I got the second plane tattooed on my shoulder blade, so if I move my arm juuuust right it crashes into the tower.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)And a giant American flag over the whole thing. He was a big guy, and it was a big tattoo.
Key West is a bizarre place, but that was one REALLY bizarre experience.
Years and years ago and I still remember it. Yuck.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)stopbush
(24,395 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)stopbush
(24,395 posts)the R-infested enterprises known as country clubs.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Sitting on your front porch, scowling at passersby, and yelling at the neighborhood kids more your speed?
meadowlander
(4,394 posts)If you don't want a tattoo, don't get one. What other people chose to do with their own bodies is none of your business.
My tattoo is awesome, has a deeply personal meaning, is attached to great memories, and 15 years after getting it and well into my 40s I'm still glad I have it and would never consider getting it removed.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)But I have always understood our bodies as being perfect upon creation.
I might understand a "STRENGTH" tattoo on a knee that you need to rely on for your soccer game. It"s always there to help you. You see that tattoo, and it helps you be the best you can be. It helps you kick that winning goal.
But a skull intertwined with an octopus, on the back of your left arm... I don't get that.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)That dude with the stupid haircut? Yeah, I don't really understand that haircut.
I might understand a burr if you're a swimmer. A haircut your rely on for your time. High speed, low drag, you know?
But a haircut that makes your head look huge and your face really small... I don't get that.
Oh. And don't get me started on golf shorts, aviator glasses, or LSD. I don't get those, either.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)It's your body. Do whatever you want to do with it. Tattoo Nipsey Russell reeling in a large-mouthed bass on your right upper forearm. I won't pass judgment about it. I really don't care..
But that doesn't mean I have to understand or appreciate why you did it.
I chose a picture of Paul Michael Glaser playing David Starsky as my DU avatar, but I don't have him enshrined on my body.
The coolest tattoo I ever saw was a guy who had the painter Bob Ross tattooed on his arm. Bob's canvas was blank. The guy with the tattoo invited people to color in Bob's canvas with their own drawing, using whatever pens were available. I think that's great.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)And 'Don't trust Teddy, he's not who he says'
xmas74
(29,673 posts)Was your wife a fragile diabetic who died under mysterious circumstances?
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)xmas74
(29,673 posts)It's such a good movie.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)The way Nolan took a relatively mundane crime story and re-ordered 1/2 the scenes to turn it into something awesome ... was genius.
One of the only movies I've ever turned around and IMMEDIATELY watched it a 2nd time. Another one such was 12 Monkeys (actually stayed in the theater to watch again), also a big fave.
kskiska
(27,045 posts)Most likely standard family names.
Celerity
(43,280 posts)Niagara
(7,595 posts)All of these ladies seem intelligent to me. There are probably more respected people who have them that we don't know about.
Sandra Bullock:
Caroline Kennedy: Post#5
https://www.therichest.com/expensive-lifestyle/celebrity-beauty-2/10-celebrities-you-probably-didnt-know-have-tattoos/
Helen Mirren: Post #4
https://www.therichest.com/expensive-lifestyle/celebrity-beauty-2/10-celebrities-you-probably-didnt-know-have-tattoos/
Dolly Parton:
flvegan
(64,407 posts)jalan48
(13,855 posts)madamesilverspurs
(15,800 posts)Years ago a friend got a unicorn tat just above her heart. Childbirth, time, and gravity have contributed to its elongation. She sighs that her grandkids get a kick out of her weird-looking giraffe.
.
jalan48
(13,855 posts)kentuck
(111,076 posts)I was in the Army in the late 60's and it was very rare to see a tattoo....anywhere.
Charles Manson had a swastika tattoo in the middle of his forehead but that was about it....
maxrandb
(15,316 posts)At one point, having a tattoo set you apart. You were different. You were going against the norm.
Soon, some folks will not have tattoos so that they can stand out and be different and go against the norm.
https://m.
samnsara
(17,615 posts)..but i waited til my 50th bday to get my first one.
JHB
(37,158 posts)When you were set against "Mr. Clean-Cut College Boy", just grow your hair long and wear "dungarees".
Then long hair became old hat, so new subcultures & their styles sprung up, some of which included tattoos.
And once some celebrities started getting them, the stigma against them among the wider culture slackened, and they entered pop culture.
Yeah, the above is simplistic, but what do you want from three sentences?
kentuck
(111,076 posts)There was a time when long hair (like the Beatles) was cool. It made a statement.
But then, rednecks wanted to be cool, too. So they grew their hair long and it wasn't cool anymore. The counterfeit culture kept popping up.
JHB
(37,158 posts)I mean, by the time Punk developed, you had Glam Rockers with hair the size of a lion's mane. Long hair was an everyday thing. No need to single out rednecks; every punk at the mall had hair down to his shoulders (or nearly so) unless they were being all preppie.
Once that's the state of things, if you want to differentiate yourself you have to move in a different direction, thus the Punks went for hair dyes, mohawks, etc.
Several iterations of that dynamic ended up with tattoos being a mundane thing, depending on what one had.
kentuck
(111,076 posts)But, I guess I can only speak from where I was at the time?
I had long hair but wanted it longer. 'Nam and the military cut back on my hair growth just a bit.
I had a very small strand of "hippie beads", which I thought was cool.
I liked listening to Spanish Caravan by the Doors, and Canned Heat for their Boogie, and Steppenwolf for their drug (or anti-drug) inferences. Who hadn't heard "The Pusher"?
Everything from Simon and Garfunkel to Jimi Hendrix.
But the long hair was not for everyone. They didn't understand the significance of the philosophy behind it?
We were proud to be called Hippies.
Cartoonist
(7,314 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)1989 Corolla, if Im being honest.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)You mean, like, smarter than you are now?
Hard to say. Here's hoping you were less judgy, tho.
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,915 posts)When we aren't super judgy about what people do with their bodies. YMMV
Codeine
(25,586 posts)What a weird thread.
RobinA
(9,888 posts)the ubiquity of hideous big tattoos today. I think if I were dating in the age group I'd need to see a Hep C test on the first date.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Modern shops are clean and safe, staffed by professionals who are trained in the safe use of their equipment.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 21, 2019, 09:53 AM - Edit history (1)
Tattoo shops must by law adhere to aseptic technique. The good onesi.e., the kind that would do these yuuuuuuge pieces you so describetend to be extremely clean.
RobinA
(9,888 posts)there has been clean-up in "good" tattoo shops. And...I am well aware of the existing Hep C treatment as well as the former cure. I work with many people who have contracted Hepatitis C in various ways, one of whom died from that original treatment. I'll stay clear of any risk factors, and I will urge others to do that same.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)I'm thinking that's not really the case.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Your premise seems irrational. Maybe we were "smarter back in those days..."
nolabear
(41,959 posts)I cannot believe people here sometimes. I swear Im tempted to go get one just in spite. But oh, no! It would mean Im stupid.
xmas74
(29,673 posts)My daughter wants us to get one together.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)I like the idea you and your daughter would get one together. I seem to have an overwhelming fear of buyers remorse-😂
xmas74
(29,673 posts)You can always add to it as time passes.
Example-a pine tree. As time goes on you can add grass, snow, a moon, flowers, a night sky,etc.
Get on Pinterest and type in tattoos. Maybe something delicate the first time?
nolabear
(41,959 posts)Ive loved his work forever, and some of it has exquisite, simple depictions of animals and people.
One of his descendants actually has a tattoo parlor in Ocean Springs, MS, where he lived, and Ive considered getting one when I visit my sister there.
But as I said, Im squirrelly about it.
xmas74
(29,673 posts)Express any concerns and see what they suggest.
Niagara
(7,595 posts)1. Research the tattoo artist. Take a close look at their accomplished work, including any of the artists cover ups. All great artists can do excellent cover ups on previously terrible tattoos.
2. Price is not something you want to be frugal about especially when it's permanent on your body. If tattoo artist A says they can do one for $60 and do they shoddy work and tattoo artist B says they can do the same one for $150 and they do beautiful work, go with artist B.
3. Ask about the recommended cream and self-care beforehand. Most artists will recommend Aquaphor although others will recommend another brand. As the tattoo heals, it scabs and it itches like crazy. You'll want the recommended cream to keep the healing process to go as smooth as possible.
4. Bring a friend or relative for support. And most importantly don't forget to breath and stay calm. Everyone has different pain tolerances and some areas of the body are more painful than other areas. I always recommend choosing a "meaty" area on the body for the first tattoo. Also consider where you would like to have it placed. Consider if you want to have it visible for others to see or in a more discreet area.
5. Don't be afraid to ask the artist questions beforehand. A good artist will answer any and all questions. Also, a good artist will explain the procedure before and during the process. If they don't answer questions or explain anything, that's your cue to get out of dodge.
6. As the previous person stated earlier, go small. You can add later if that's what you want. You'll probably end up getting shaved in the area that you choose, so consider this as well if it's not normally an area that you shave.
P.S. Good luck and keep us posted if you decide to get a tattoo
nolabear
(41,959 posts)The tattoo artist I mentioned is well respected and likely costly but I agree its worth it for good art. I dont think Id go for anything big anyway. Im old enough so certain areas are likely too thin skinned too.
Niagara
(7,595 posts)I made the mistake of not researching the first artist that I went to 25 years ago. They did shoddy work but I was able to get it reworked later on.
I hope that my advice helps.
pstokely
(10,525 posts)nt
xmas74
(29,673 posts)Or the parlor in Missouri?
Tracer
(2,769 posts)...neither my daughter, son and daughter-in-law have tattoos and don't plan on getting any.
Most of the tats I've seen are randomly placed and quite un-artistic.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)...my parents were more concerned with my education than their subjective takes on the aesthetics of my skin.
a la izquierda
(11,791 posts)Im covered (still have some blank spaces that will stay blank for the most part). My parents are ecstatic that I have a PhD and teach at a major research institute.
Neither they, nor my bosses, give one iota about my ink.
progressoid
(49,968 posts)xmas74
(29,673 posts)And I have tats.
I'll dedicate my next one to you. I'm planning on a blood red moon partially covered by clouds. I think it will go on the upper left of my back.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)There's a first time for everything, I guess.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Then I got a tattoo.
Now I need my cat to tie my shoes every morning.
xmas74
(29,673 posts)I was number 12 in my graduating class of 375. I now need a reminder to both chew and swallow my food.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)Why would you say that?
meadowlander
(4,394 posts)In Maori culture (as well as many others), tattoos have deep cultural significance. After colonization, people were not allowed to get them so when people of Maori descent get them today they are in part of symbol of pride in their identity and heritage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C4%81_moko
Saying, essentially, that anyone who gets a tattoo is an idiot shows (at the least) a serious lack of understanding of what they mean in other cultures.
Polybius
(15,373 posts)I saw some video of Woodstock with full nudity. Yeck!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Who is 'we' and why the assumption that it's smarter not to have tattoos?
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)how anyone was able to watch the concert without viewing it through their smartphone.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Next question?
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Says generation famous for its consumption of hard drugs.
Keep on truckin'.
obamanut2012
(26,064 posts)applegrove
(118,598 posts)Then in the late 80s it became a thing for anybody.
randr
(12,409 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)Especially the "full sleeve" ones, or on the face. I do try hard not to be judgemental, and I sincerely hope that whenever I'm talking with someone with tattoos that my dislike doesn't show in my voice or body language.
I will say that I'm grateful neither of my sons has gotten any tattoos.
But, even though a part of me would like to think that people are dumb to get tattoos, the body art they choose has almost nothing to do with innate intelligence.
And as several people have pointed out, in every era people find ways to distinguish themselves from their elders and from others around them.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)Try harder.
madamesilverspurs
(15,800 posts)And not being fond of needles, I was almost 40 before I got brave enough to have my ears pierced. So, I'm untatted at 71 and will likely remain so.
That said, there is some gorgeous ink work out there, very gifted artists. I admit to wondering, though, about undergoing the pain (and expense) of pictures that are placed where the wearer can never see them. On the flip side, there are the tats that look like the wearer passed out in a room full of toddlers wielding felt tip markers; gotta wonder.
.
bloom
(11,635 posts)Women could be 'radical' just by wearing pants.
As far as tattoos - Some are beautiful, some are not.
My doctor warned that they probably have toxic metals in them.
I'm thinking I may get one when I'm 75. Just for fun.
Liberty Belle
(9,533 posts)I never saw a woman with one, either, until recent years.
NCLefty
(3,678 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Tattoos today are quite beautiful.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)not many piercings either, I suspect.
We spent all our money (what little we had) on pot and beads.
Oh, and on albums. )
Democat13
(4 posts)Back then, most people would not have gotten tattoos, mainly because it was not considered acceptable, even by those who were protesting the Establishment in other ways. Honestly, I also think that no one felt the need to express opinions or to show a sense of belonging by such drastic measures. There was more of a sense of inner belonging, if you will, to a cause or to a philosophy of life. It might be hard for the younger people today, who seem to think that tattoos are a necessary part of life, to understand that getting a tattoo "just wasn't done" in those days. Very few men had tattoos -- and no woman would dare to even think about having one.
I was 13 years old at the time of Woodstock, and I remember that, even those of us who had the message of Woodstock -- peace and love -- written in our hearts would never in a million years have considered having that message placed into our skin. Since then, I have known and loved many people who have tattoos, and I understand that each one of those people felt a certain "need" to have tattoos; however, being from a different era, the proliferation of tattoos in our world today troubles me at some level.
As someone who is a political liberal, I often wonder why I sometimes react to the idea of tattoos in a negative way. Yet, when thinking about it, I must admit that I am a product of the era in which I grew up. Also, I must mention that, somewhat ironically, most of the people with tattoos whom I encounter seem to be "wearing" messages or symbols that are deeply inspired by right-wing thinking.
Have I ever thought about getting a tattoo? Sure. Yet, except for the five little dots on my chest that were placed there prior to my getting radiation treatments for breast cancer, I have not yet made the giant leap. Do I have messages that I want known by others? I certainly do! For now, though, I feel much more comfortable displaying those messages on a t-shirt, sweatshirt, or bumper sticker. At the age of 63, maybe I'm just too old to change, but as a woman who has seen the remarkable progress made during the past 50 years now being destroyed daily, maybe it's time to reconsider. Whether or not I ever get it permanently etched into my skin or not, the message of Woodstock -- peace and love -- will always be emblazoned in my heart.
One more thought on Woodstock: It occurred to me (and probably to many others) that the thousands and thousands of people who gathered at Yasgur's Farm 50 years ago were not carrying guns, nor were they in fear of anyone who might be. I think that speaks volumes about the real difference between that long ago time and now. Would that we could all go back there again!!!