Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,986 posts)
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 07:27 PM Jan 2012

Yoo: Recess Appt: NO---Torture: YES

YOO: I think President Obama has exceeded his powers by making a recess appointment for Richard Cordray ... to head the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
http://ricochet.com/main-feed/Obama-Oversteps-His-Limits-with-Cordray-Recess-Appointment


Of course this was the same John Yoo who, when asked:

If the President deems that he's got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person's child, there is no law that can stop him?

... replied:

YOO: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/05/1051812/-President-Obamas-recess-appointment-was-wrong--ask-John-Yoo?via=blog_1

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yoo: Recess Appt: NO---Torture: YES (Original Post) kpete Jan 2012 OP
More Yoo Woo. Zorra Jan 2012 #1
Well, considering Bush/Cheney (and the rest) are still free... Solly Mack Jan 2012 #2
I hate this fucking guy sharp_stick Jan 2012 #3
One can only hope that someone challenging the recess appointments hires Yoo onenote Jan 2012 #4

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
3. I hate this fucking guy
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 07:38 PM
Jan 2012

I don't know of any other "professor" that has to hold his classes in secret because he's afraid of facing people that may not agree with his pathetic application of the constitution.

onenote

(42,700 posts)
4. One can only hope that someone challenging the recess appointments hires Yoo
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 07:42 PM
Jan 2012

The guy is a joke. To cite just one example, in his article, he makes the following statement: "Here, as I understand it, the Senate is not officially in adjournment (they have held "pro forma" meetings, where little to no business occurs, to prevent Obama from making exactly such appointments). So there is no question whether the adjournment has become a constitutional "recess."

Uh, John, here's a link to the Congressional Record for January 3: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/B?r112:@FIELD(FLD003+d)+@FIELD(DDATE+20120103)

See the words "The Senate met in pro forma session to convene the second session of the 112th Congress at 12:01:32 p.m., and adjourned at 12:02:13 p.m. until 11 a.m., on Friday, January 6, 2012." That means, and I know this is hard, that the Senate is officially in adjournment for three days. So much for John's great legal theory.

What a pathetic hack.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yoo: Recess Appt: NO---To...