General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal Judges Scorch Wisconsin
Federal Judges Scorch Wisconsin
MILWAUKEE (CN) - Republican legislators cannot keep private information on Wisconsin's redistricting, a three-judge federal panel ruled, writing bluntly: "the Legislature has taken action that affects the voting rights of Wisconsin's citizens and now attempts to cloak the record of that action behind a charade masking as privilege."
"Quite clearly, the Wisconsin State Senate and Wisconsin State Assembly (collectively, the 'Legislature') and its attorneys are none too pleased with this three-judge Court's prior orders, filed on December 8, 2011, and December 20, 2011, respectively," the judges wrote. "By those orders, this Court twice held that neither Joe Handrick, a lobbyist hired by the Legislature to assist in preparing the redistricting plan now challenged in this case, nor documents in his possession are protected by legislative privilege, attorney-client privilege, or work product privilege. The Legislature's dissatisfaction with the Court's prior decisions is clear from its refusal to comply with those orders. Rather than comply, the Legislature has all but declined to cooperate with the plaintiffs' reasonable discovery efforts. And, now, the Legislature again reaffirms its displeasure by filing a 'Motion for Review by Three-Judge Court' of the Court's two prior orders.
"But this new motion - in reality, the Legislature's second collateral attack on the wisdom of the Court's prior orders in as many weeks - is completely devoid of merit. In the Court's eyes, this motion is nothing more than a third bite at an apple that the Court has twice explained is a bitter one to chew. In reality, the Court can deny the Legislature's motion without reaching its merits; but, even quickly reaching the merits, it is clear that the Legislature's motion fails. And, thus - for the third time - this Court rules that neither Mr. Handrick nor the documents he holds are protected by privilege." (Citations omitted.)
U.S. District Judge J.P. Stadtmueller wrote the latest order in Alvin Baldus et al. v. Members of the Wisconsin Accountability Board and Voces de la Frontera et al. v. Members of the Wisconsin Accountability Board.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/05/42793.htm
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... whatever, it's almost certain to further discredit the R's.
Cerridwen
(13,258 posts)Damn! You do not piss off a judge - they pissed off three. LOL
Oh my.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,912 posts)Bandit
(21,475 posts)Republicans know they will never be tried for destroying records.. It was all an accident didn't you know...
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Judge Stadtmueller does have a way with words.