Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Phrase 'CIA-Backed Paramilitaries' Ought to Set the Alarm Bells Ringing
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a29664790/afghanistan-cia-backed-paramilitary-groups/
Apparently, that's what we've got going in Afghanistan.
BY CHARLES P. PIERCE
NOV 1, 2019
The rest of the world grinds on, and we're still in Afghanistan, for whatever the reason might be. We're as mired there as any other foreign power through history has been mired and, like those other foreign powers, our involvement there is headed to a very dark place, at least according to Human Rights Watch. From Stars and Stripes:
Anyone who lived through, say, the 1980s gets a cold chill when reading the phrase "CIA-backed paramilitaries" as visions of murdered nuns and assassinated archbishops rise again from a purgatorial history. And with an entire administration* dedicated to keeping the public as ignorant as possible about its own crimes, the rest of the world gets obscured in a collateral way. Until the nephew of someone killed by "CIA-backed paramilitaries" decides to get his own back, straps on a belt laden with C4, and hitches a ride into town.
</snip>
Apparently, that's what we've got going in Afghanistan.
BY CHARLES P. PIERCE
NOV 1, 2019
The rest of the world grinds on, and we're still in Afghanistan, for whatever the reason might be. We're as mired there as any other foreign power through history has been mired and, like those other foreign powers, our involvement there is headed to a very dark place, at least according to Human Rights Watch. From Stars and Stripes:
Afghan strike forces, which have been accused of raiding medical facilities and killing civilians in night raids on their homes, sometimes in front of their families, are largely trained and overseen by the CIA, Human Rights Watch said in a report released Thursday. The report follows a strike force raid last month in eastern Nangarhar province that resulted in the deaths of four brothers, prompting Afghanistans president to announce a rare investigation into paramilitary actions.
U.S. special operations forces lent to the CIA often accompany the paramilitaries on the raids, and the U.S. military regularly provides logistical and tactical support for the operations, including airstrikes that have indiscriminately or disproportionately killed Afghan civilians, the report said. They are illustrative of a larger pattern of serious laws-of-war violations some amounting to war crimes that extend to all provinces in Afghanistan where these paramilitary forces operate with impunity, Human Rights Watch said.
Anyone who lived through, say, the 1980s gets a cold chill when reading the phrase "CIA-backed paramilitaries" as visions of murdered nuns and assassinated archbishops rise again from a purgatorial history. And with an entire administration* dedicated to keeping the public as ignorant as possible about its own crimes, the rest of the world gets obscured in a collateral way. Until the nephew of someone killed by "CIA-backed paramilitaries" decides to get his own back, straps on a belt laden with C4, and hitches a ride into town.
</snip>
Great. How many of Erik Prince's boys are over there?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1006 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Phrase 'CIA-Backed Paramilitaries' Ought to Set the Alarm Bells Ringing (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
Nov 2019
OP
dchill
(38,481 posts)1. "Erik Prince's boys..."
That's what "CIA-backed paramilitaries" means to me.
mopinko
(70,090 posts)2. afghanistan is just a proxy war where we are
bribing old warlords, giving them cia phones to bomb their old enemy warlords.
'the northern alliance' was exactly that. it was a jsoc led campaign from day one.
these dudes were plenty brutal enough when we got there. and we handed them a big ole pile of dynamite.
DFW
(54,369 posts)3. Probably another situation like the one in San Marcos
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)4. Greenwald and Scahill were unavailable for comment
crickets
(25,968 posts)5. How many decades does this have to go on? /rhetorical *sigh*
I feel so sorry for the Afghan people. The whole situation is such a mess.
pecosbob
(7,538 posts)6. I heard his people were involved in that recent Carribean kerfuffle
where some folks had to be hastily flown to the U.S. after having been stopped in a sedan full of weapons.