Have the Democrats already subpoenaed Giuliani, Bolton, Mulvaney, McGahn, Pence, Perry, and Pompeo?

[kentuck]

How can there be a Senate trial without hearing from those witnesses??

Although they may defy the House subpoenas, could they also ignore Senate subpoenas in a Senate trial?

In my opinion, if the Democrats have not yet subpoenaed the above witnesses, it would be difficult to argue that a Senate trial would be fair to the American people.

There is no need for the Democrats to disarm if they go to the trial in the Senate. They should demand those witnesses appear.

I cannot see how it would be possible to deny their request?

[PSPS]

1. I think all except Pence have been and have ignored them

[kentuck]

2. Could they continue to ignore a subpoena if it came from the Senate?

For the purpose of a trial of the President??

[PSPS]

4. I doubt Moscow Mitch will permit such subpoenas in his Duma.

[kentuck]

5. Would it be up to McConnell or chief Justice Roberts?

It would seem very unfair to leave out such important witnesses in such an important trial?

[PSPS]

6. Roberts' presence is merely ceremonial. Moscow Mitch establishes all the rules.

[kentuck]

8. Don't they have to vote on the rules first?

It's not even a given that Republicans would win that vote.

[beachbumbob]

3. Monday is a court ruling on some of the subpeonas

as for a senate trial, who knows but they would end up taking the 5th

[triron]

7. If the ruling goes favorably for democrats will it be appealed?

[DENVERPOPS]

10. Not to worry

It would immediately go to the Supreme Court and you will quickly notice the reason Gorsuch and Kavanah were stuffed in the court....

[mcar]

9. Yes