General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTiedrich claims Giuliani Bar status is "inactive" and that is why he works for Trump for "free"
I don't know if this is true or not, but it has some real implications for any compelled testimony, if so.Link to tweet
Cirque du So-What
(25,938 posts)Rump knows there is no attorney - client privilege, and if Ghouliani is compelled to testify, he'd have to spill his guts or put himself at risk.
hlthe2b
(102,250 posts)patricia92243
(12,595 posts)UTUSN
(70,686 posts)euphorb
(279 posts)State bar rules differ (but only slightly), but I am not aware of any bar rule governing the behavior of an attorney that makes a distinction based on whether the attorney is paid or not. I am on inactive status in Illinois (because I am retired). As such, I am prohibited from practicing law or holding myself out as available to practice law. It doesn't matter whether I do it for free or get paid. The prohibition is absolute. I cannot imagine the New York rule would be different.
Sanity Claws
(21,847 posts)On retirement status, you can provide pro bono services.
He is listed as currently registered in New York State. Go to http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/attorney/AttorneySearch#search_result to check.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,847 posts)so why take inactive?
On retirement status, you do not have to continue paying dues. New York does not have an official inactive status but unofficially it refers to the time that the attorney is not actively practicing law. The attorney is excused from CLE requirements while inactive but must continue paying dues. While on this inactive status, one cannot practice law, not even on a pro bono basis.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Thanks for explaining how New York works.
In one of my states, inactive means you can't hold yourself out as practicing law and don't have to meet CLE requirements, but you also don't have to pay dues. I'm not sure how that differs from retirement status - I haven't checked that.
Sanity Claws
(21,847 posts)He is listed as currently registered in New York State. See http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/attorney/AttorneySearch#search_result
I originally said he was not listed. My mistake. I must have spelled his name incorrectly the first time.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Not sure what Tiedrich is talking about.
JudyM
(29,236 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)a crime will not have executive privilege.
Rudy in a world of hurt, hope it gets worse
TeamPooka
(24,223 posts)Stallion
(6,474 posts)the client thought he was an attorney when the client revealed the privileged information. (At least in Texas). The privilege is actually to protect the client not the attorney and the client gets to decide when to waive it-it can't be waived by the attorney
hlthe2b
(102,250 posts)spinbaby
(15,090 posts)Imagine if Trump had a competent lawyer.
Blue Owl
(50,360 posts)n/t