Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:19 PM

milestogo (11,252 posts)

Today a twenty-something told me that she doesn't plan to have children because of climate change.

She doesn't think we are going to be able to save the planet.

Wow, just wow.

134 replies, 10209 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

134 replies	Author	Time	Post
Today a twenty-something told me that she doesn't plan to have children because of climate change. (Original post)	milestogo	Jan 2020	OP
Both my twenty-something kids feel the same way.	yardwork	Jan 2020	#1
Are you worried about the suffering and challenges your kids are going to endure?	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#102
Of course.	yardwork	Jan 2020	#104
Do you regret having them? Knowing now what their future may be?	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#106
Of course not. But my children's choices are their own.	yardwork	Jan 2020	#107
Of course you can't tell them what to do but you can say what you did.	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#108
They already know that.	yardwork	Jan 2020	#116
I've heard that too.	C_U_L8R	Jan 2020	#2
Smart woman.	Cattledog	Jan 2020	#3
I agree, smart. I made the same decision forty odd years ago.	LiberalLoner	Jan 2020	#20
The nihilism of the 17-25 year olds that I know is remarkable even to this hard Genxer.	WhiskeyGrinder	Jan 2020	#4
How is that? Isn't her decision wise if she only envisions suffering for a child she bears? nt	Blue_true	Jan 2020	#22
She's young enough herself to probably be a casualty of climate change.	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#96
Excellent point about her youth and that climate change will impact her.	Blue_true	Jan 2020	#117
Back in the day, having young ones in the family was a survival tactic.	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#122
If things get as bad as they are tracking to be, those adult children	Blue_true	Jan 2020	#123
It's the kind of life billions now live	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#124
Climate change will present exponentially more difficult challenges, even	Blue_true	Jan 2020	#125
The effects of climate change will not be uniform throughout the world	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#134
Maybe it is...	Newest Reality	Jan 2020	#32
Eventually America will only be filled with brainwashed rwnj children if we let the future scare us	dustyscamp	Jan 2020	#5
"'Let' let the future scare us"	Duppers	Jan 2020	#26
If I was diagnosed with cancer and had only a little bit of time left on this world	dustyscamp	Jan 2020	#52
Know any climate scientists?	Duppers	Jan 2020	#82
2nd thoughts	Duppers	Jan 2020	#86
If we wreck this planet, no fucking way do we have any business	Crunchy Frog	Jan 2020	#88
In the end, Earth, because it's always changing, will kill every living thing.	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#109
But would you decide to have (more) children?	robbob	Jan 2020	#110
The cold hard facts are that the effects of climate change will not be uniform around the world	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#64
I am around that age a lot and every one has made this comment.	Bummfuzzle	Jan 2020	#6
My 32yo son will remain childless.	Duppers	Jan 2020	#28
it does not take degrees to understand climate change	Skittles	Jan 2020	#41
The ones I know are working on their secondary degrees, mostly. Right.	Bummfuzzle	Jan 2020	#48
👍	Duppers	Jan 2020	#83
I decided not to when I was 11	safeinOhio	Jan 2020	#7
Ditto that. I could see this shit coming decades ago. n/t	CousinIT	Jan 2020	#14
Me too (or there about) ...	Auggie	Jan 2020	#27
I hear somewhat older childless couples among my own friends saying now that they are glad they	hlthe2b	Jan 2020	#8
On The Beach.	ret5hd	Jan 2020	#9
+1. Check it out.	yonder	Jan 2020	#10
Yep.	sheshe2	Jan 2020	#30
I said the same thing	Bev54	Jan 2020	#11
My daughter is 24 and has zero interest in kids	Takket	Jan 2020	#12
I don't want children, but when I was a twenty something I didn't know any female who didn't.	milestogo	Jan 2020	#13
Climate change is just one reason	Disaffected	Jan 2020	#15
Climate change equals	Duppers	Jan 2020	#31
True,	Disaffected	Jan 2020	#65
Both of my married sons already decided years ago that they won't reproduce.	scarletwoman	Jan 2020	#16
I've mostly felt the same way	Ahpook	Jan 2020	#69
A lot of us were saying this in the sixties and seventies ...	marble falls	Jan 2020	#17
Our 30 something daughter feels the same,	yonder	Jan 2020	#18
I'm sure	bdamomma	Jan 2020	#70
Perspective. Thank you.	yonder	Jan 2020	#80
Real estate and farm prices crashed in the 1920s	Warpy	Jan 2020	#92
Hello Warpy!!!!	CountAllVotes	Jan 2020	#98
Personally, it would be a financial choice not to have kids	sakabatou	Jan 2020	#19
Maybe she's read "The Population Bomb", by Paul Ehrlich	Sonny Mirviss	Jan 2020	#21
Just found my copy of that book	csziggy	Jan 2020	#24
Really?	former9thward	Jan 2020	#90
So, you got my point.	Sonny Mirviss	Jan 2020	#93
Yep, my kids too.	FirstLight	Jan 2020	#23
I told my kids not to bring children into the world.	murielm99	Jan 2020	#33
My siblings' children	2naSalit	Jan 2020	#25
We did not have children and do not regret that.	TNNurse	Jan 2020	#29
This is not new. Many have been thinking for a long time that this is unsustainable. We cannot in	Evolve Dammit	Jan 2020	#34
Wait, how can they be parents if they have no children?	smirkymonkey	Jan 2020	#43
Lol!	cwydro	Jan 2020	#60
Sorry; married couples. My bad.	Evolve Dammit	Jan 2020	#120
No problem.	smirkymonkey	Jan 2020	#121
I have three adult daughters...	Sedona	Jan 2020	#35
As an old Boomer...	Newest Reality	Jan 2020	#36
Fallout is imminent or soon	bucolic_frolic	Jan 2020	#37
She's probably correct.	paleotn	Jan 2020	#38
Good move	CountAllVotes	Jan 2020	#39
Fertility rates have been dropping world wide for decades. Women are feeling their power and	Kurt V.	Jan 2020	#40
It's like all these different facets of the Handmaid's Tale, are	dewsgirl	Jan 2020	#56
I made the same decision back in the 70s & 80s for the same reason. I had no faith that humanity	catbyte	Jan 2020	#42
This is nothing new.	llmart	Jan 2020	#44
My friend's 30 year old son said the same thing	DesertRat	Jan 2020	#45
I never wanted children and didn't have them, and don't regret it at all.	smirkymonkey	Jan 2020	#46
You don't have to add to overpopulation	TexasBushwhacker	Jan 2020	#47
If I were 20 again	Timewas	Jan 2020	#49
My son made the same decision.	lunatica	Jan 2020	#50
I heard that in the fifties about nuclear war	spike jones	Jan 2020	#51
I decided the same in 1965.	MineralMan	Jan 2020	#53
I agree.	warmfeet	Jan 2020	#54
Smart decision.	BigmanPigman	Jan 2020	#55
Happily Childfree	cagefreesoylentgreen	Jan 2020	#57
Don't worry, plenty of people in India/Bangladesh will take their place	Baclava	Jan 2020	#58
There've been too many adults in need of parenting in my life.	Mersky	Jan 2020	#59
If I were a GenZ person, I am not sure I'd have kids, either.	PatrickforO	Jan 2020	#61
My daughter and I were talking about choices	Marthe48	Jan 2020	#62
She is smart.	MLAA	Jan 2020	#63
I'm in my 30s and haven't had children for that reason (among others)	Tiggeroshii	Jan 2020	#66
Both my 20 somethings	Andy Canuck	Jan 2020	#67
The planet doesn't need saving. It will outlast the human species by millions of years	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#68
Neither does my 32 year-old son.	ancianita	Jan 2020	#71
My husband keeps saying the wrong ones	marlakay	Jan 2020	#72
Well, she's ASSUMING she's going to have a choice about that!	Texin	Jan 2020	#73
Why would you even go there?	Bummfuzzle	Jan 2020	#84
We might not be in this situation had we, the older generation, decided not to have kids.	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#74
Some of us did just that. Not enough, apparently.	MineralMan	Jan 2020	#111
She is likely correct too.	BeckyDem	Jan 2020	#75
m kids as well	handmade34	Jan 2020	#76
No surprise...	Hulk	Jan 2020	#77
My 29 year old says the same thing🙁	rainy	Jan 2020	#78
For perspective, some 20-somethings a generation ago said the same thing because of nuclear war	JHB	Jan 2020	#79
There are a lot of people doing that	NCProgressive	Jan 2020	#81
Good	jcgoldie	Jan 2020	#85
Ditto on my 20 something	Olafjoy	Jan 2020	#87
I'll never have grandchildren from my son	Bluesaph	Jan 2020	#89
No Kids, No Regrets	Upward	Jan 2020	#91
didn't realize there were so many older people here	Apple Fritter	Jan 2020	#94
twenty-somethings are young enough to probably fall victim to the ravages of climate change	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#95
Do any of us older folks worry about the suffering our twenty-something kids are going to endure?	Kaleva	Jan 2020	#97
Climate change is a population issue.	MineralMan	Jan 2020	#113
Yes. I can see how they feel hopelessly screwed over.	milestogo	Jan 2020	#115
But the world's population will hit 8 billion in 2023.	JustABozoOnThisBus	Jan 2020	#99
Kick	ck4829	Jan 2020	#100
Her choice but she's more pessimistic than climate scientists.	Loki Liesmith	Jan 2020	#101
On average even with insurance	exboyfil	Jan 2020	#103
My younger daughter, now 33	greymattermom	Jan 2020	#105
Smart	StarryNite	Jan 2020	#112
I started asking doctors about a vasectomy at 25.	Jokerman	Jan 2020	#114
I wish the evangelical bible-thumpers down the street from me felt the same way.	jcmaine72	Jan 2020	#118
Good lord,maybe they just like kids. I have six,my body,my choice.	virgogal	Jan 2020	#126
Did you read what I wrote? They're bible-thumping nuts.	jcmaine72	Jan 2020	#128
Who is going to pay my social security?	Joe941	Jan 2020	#119
It was in 1999. . .	Collimator	Jan 2020	#127
Cold hard scientific fact has little to do with the psychology of self fulfilling prophecy...	tandem5	Jan 2020	#129
I chose not to breed...	BluNoMatterHu	Jan 2020	#130
My soon-to-be 35 year old daughter feels differently	DFW	Jan 2020	#131
Yeah, I've heard that a lot	Bradical79	Jan 2020	#132
Adopt	Bradical79	Jan 2020	#133

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:20 PM

yardwork (53,442 posts)

1. Both my twenty-something kids feel the same way.

Reply to this post

Response to yardwork (Reply #1)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 06:54 AM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

102. Are you worried about the suffering and challenges your kids are going to endure?

Reply to this post

Response to Kaleva (Reply #102)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 08:12 AM

yardwork (53,442 posts)

104. Of course.

Reply to this post

Response to yardwork (Reply #104)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 08:24 AM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

106. Do you regret having them? Knowing now what their future may be?

Reply to this post

Response to Kaleva (Reply #106)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 08:35 AM

yardwork (53,442 posts)

107. Of course not. But my children's choices are their own.

I can't tell my adult children what to do, especially regarding such an important lifelong decision.

Reply to this post

Response to yardwork (Reply #107)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 09:34 AM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

108. Of course you can't tell them what to do but you can say what you did.

You can tell them that you have no regrets in having them even if their futures are potentially quite bleak.

Reply to this post

Response to Kaleva (Reply #108)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 12:09 PM

yardwork (53,442 posts)

116. They already know that.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:21 PM

C_U_L8R (41,273 posts)

2. I've heard that too.

Not just climate change. There's not a lot of hope for the future out there. We really messed up.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:21 PM

Cattledog (5,224 posts)

3. Smart woman.

We made the same choice 30 yrs ago.

Reply to this post

Response to Cattledog (Reply #3)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:05 PM

LiberalLoner (8,651 posts)

20. I agree, smart. I made the same decision forty odd years ago.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:24 PM

WhiskeyGrinder (15,278 posts)

4. The nihilism of the 17-25 year olds that I know is remarkable even to this hard Genxer.

Reply to this post

Response to WhiskeyGrinder (Reply #4)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:15 PM

Blue_true (31,259 posts)

22. How is that? Isn't her decision wise if she only envisions suffering for a child she bears? nt

Reply to this post

Response to Blue_true (Reply #22)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 05:41 AM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

96. She's young enough herself to probably be a casualty of climate change.

I wonder of the young woman's parents worry about the suffering she is sure to face when she's older.

Reply to this post

Response to Kaleva (Reply #96)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 05:22 PM

Blue_true (31,259 posts)

117. Excellent point about her youth and that climate change will impact her.

To me, that makes her decision even wiser. She is in her twenties per the OP, so she has time to change her mind.

Reply to this post

Response to Blue_true (Reply #117)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 09:52 PM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

122. Back in the day, having young ones in the family was a survival tactic.

The now 20-something will likely be aged herself by the time things get bad and she'll not have offspring or adult grandchildren who can assist her.

Reply to this post

Response to Kaleva (Reply #122)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 09:56 PM

Blue_true (31,259 posts)

123. If things get as bad as they are tracking to be, those adult children

and grandchildren would struggle every day to survive. What type of life is that?

Reply to this post

Response to Blue_true (Reply #123)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 10:14 PM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

124. It's the kind of life billions now live

With our wealth, we think of a few days without electricity to be a real struggle. Edit: I could go several months or longer but I sure would prefer not to.

Living conditions like below are foreign to us:

Reply to this post

Response to Kaleva (Reply #124)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 10:26 PM

Blue_true (31,259 posts)

125. Climate change will present exponentially more difficult challenges, even

for the rich. No one, nor any nation will be exempt.

Reply to this post

Response to Blue_true (Reply #125)

Wed Jan 8, 2020, 08:03 PM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

134. The effects of climate change will not be uniform throughout the world

Some areas will actually become better suited for human habitation.

Reply to this post

Response to WhiskeyGrinder (Reply #4)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:46 PM

Newest Reality (12,712 posts)

32. Maybe it is...

Maybe it is more of a pessimism that is based on the projections and expectations of current conditions, which are not very promising at all? They may be expression love for their unborn children who have no choice in the matter.

I tend to think of that as more like a pragmatic realism rather than merely nihilistic. It reminds me of antinatalism, which is almost similar to negative utilitarianism.

But, that's my Boomer hippie stuff, perhaps?

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:25 PM

dustyscamp (1,954 posts)

5. Eventually America will only be filled with brainwashed rwnj children if we let the future scare us

Reply to this post

Response to dustyscamp (Reply #5)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:36 PM

Duppers (23,702 posts)

26. "'Let' let the future scare us"

It's the cold, hard facts of the scientific reports.

Reply to this post

Response to Duppers (Reply #26)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:12 PM

dustyscamp (1,954 posts)

52. If I was diagnosed with cancer and had only a little bit of time left on this world

I'm sure as hell wouldn't sit there and accept it. I would go out and have fun til I couldn't do it anymore. Humanity probably won't be able to turn back the damage that has been done to the planet, but maybe someday in the future someone smart will finally build spacecrafts for us to get of the planet and go someplace else or develops something that will considerably help rejuvenate the planet.
In the meantime before all that I'm sure people in the background have been working hard to develop short term tech and procedures that will help humanity survive through this.

Reply to this post

Response to dustyscamp (Reply #52)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:25 PM

Duppers (23,702 posts)

82. Know any climate scientists?

NASA folks? Physicists?

I understand where you're coming from but you are in denial. There is no accessible "Planet B."

https://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/no-planet-b

Reply to this post

Response to dustyscamp (Reply #52)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:48 PM

Duppers (23,702 posts)

86. 2nd thoughts

You're diagnosed with cancer, as you proposed. You're going to bring a child into the world with little to no chance of living a full lifespan without living in a dystopian climate according to most climate predictions?

Sure, we can build enough spacecraft to hold the world's population to escape this burning planet. Sure.

Reply to this post

Response to dustyscamp (Reply #52)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:58 PM

Crunchy Frog (25,268 posts)

88. If we wreck this planet, no fucking way do we have any business

Going off and finding other planets to wreck.

If we succeed in making Earth uninhabitable, then we absolutely deserve to go extinct along with all the other life forms that we will have destroyed.

Reply to this post

Response to Crunchy Frog (Reply #88)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 09:43 AM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

109. In the end, Earth, because it's always changing, will kill every living thing.

Reply to this post

Response to dustyscamp (Reply #52)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 10:34 AM

robbob (3,067 posts)

110. But would you decide to have (more) children?

If you were diagnosed with cancer and told it was inoperable; you only have 5 years max to live. Would you decide to start a family? That’s the more apt analogy, not “going out and having fun”.

Reply to this post

Response to Duppers (Reply #26)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:37 PM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

64. The cold hard facts are that the effects of climate change will not be uniform around the world

Some areas will actually become better suited for human habitation.

Scroll down to page 15 of the following report on Alaska:

https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/lands/ecosystems/pdfs/sp10_14.pdf

One observation I've made is that despite the angst expressed by many about climate change, very few appear to be doing anything to adapt to it. It's like they have the opinion that climate change will be bad but it's something that will happen to others and not them.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:27 PM

Bummfuzzle (154 posts)

6. I am around that age a lot and every one has made this comment.

Last edited Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:44 PM - Edit history (1)

Reply to this post

Response to Bummfuzzle (Reply #6)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:41 PM

Duppers (23,702 posts)

28. My 32yo son will remain childless.

He and his g.f. are well-read, well-educated, and know what's coming. (They've 5 degrees between the two of them.)

Reply to this post

Response to Duppers (Reply #28)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:58 PM

Skittles (140,370 posts)

41. it does not take degrees to understand climate change

just so you know

Reply to this post

Response to Duppers (Reply #28)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:10 PM

Bummfuzzle (154 posts)

48. The ones I know are working on their secondary degrees, mostly. Right.

Reply to this post

Response to Bummfuzzle (Reply #48)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:27 PM

Duppers (23,702 posts)

83. 👍

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:27 PM

safeinOhio (25,793 posts)

7. I decided not to when I was 11

So far so good and I’m now 70.

Reply to this post

Response to safeinOhio (Reply #7)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:37 PM

CousinIT (6,817 posts)

14. Ditto that. I could see this shit coming decades ago. n/t

Reply to this post

Response to safeinOhio (Reply #7)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:39 PM

Auggie (27,892 posts)

27. Me too (or there about) ...

Over population and air pollution were themes we studied in the 1970s. They just have another name now.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:28 PM

hlthe2b (90,047 posts)

8. I hear somewhat older childless couples among my own friends saying now that they are glad they

didn't have children. That doesn't mean they aren't working to change things for the next generation, mind you--just that the guilt of not being able to affect all the change that they sought and know that we desperately need has left them feeling sanguine about not having children.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:28 PM

ret5hd (17,522 posts)

9. On The Beach.

Reply to this post

Response to ret5hd (Reply #9)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:30 PM

yonder (7,368 posts)

10. +1. Check it out.

Reply to this post

Response to ret5hd (Reply #9)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:43 PM

sheshe2 (74,867 posts)

30. Yep.

Read that one in my young teens.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:31 PM

Bev54 (4,937 posts)

11. I said the same thing

When I was in my early 20's and our rivers and air were so polluted. I had children and the pollution was cleaned up. We were all very idealistic when we were young.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:31 PM

Takket (15,896 posts)

12. My daughter is 24 and has zero interest in kids

Maybe it will change as she gets older but right now she is struggling to make ends meet (we help as much as we can) while her boyfriend (husband someday I think) is in a training program.

But besides the economics she is just disgusted with the world and it gets worse every day under drumpf. I don’t blame anyone for not wanting kids these days.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:33 PM

milestogo (11,252 posts)

13. I don't want children, but when I was a twenty something I didn't know any female who didn't.

So it came as a shock.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:39 PM

Disaffected (2,340 posts)

15. Climate change is just one reason

How 'bout mass starvation and disease. Or, pollution, economic collapse and global war?

I despair for the youth of today and am glad I won't be around to see it.

"Once was the time of man..."

Reply to this post

Response to Disaffected (Reply #15)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:46 PM

Duppers (23,702 posts)

31. Climate change equals

Mass starvation, disease, more pollution, economic collapse, and global war.

Climate change will cause all of these.

Reply to this post

Response to Duppers (Reply #31)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:42 PM

Disaffected (2,340 posts)

65. True,

but each could well happen for other reasons. Climate change makes it all the more likely (certain?).

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:40 PM

scarletwoman (31,893 posts)

16. Both of my married sons already decided years ago that they won't reproduce.

They both think that it's irresponsible to add to the planet's population at this point in time.

I understand and respect their decisions, although it has also saddened me - no grandkids! (sniff)

I think that if I were in my 20s today, I would probably not want to bring any children into this world, either.

Not just because of climate change, also because of the current worldwide political and economic climate. Why bring children into a world ruled by oligarchs, when those children would have nothing to look forward to except serfdom?

Reply to this post

Response to scarletwoman (Reply #16)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:49 PM

Ahpook (2,667 posts)

69. I've mostly felt the same way

In my 20's I didn't want children. I married in my 30's to a beautiful wife who had two children. I had my same feelings but went with it because of falling head over heels in love. Ended up being a great experience as the children treated me as if I was their dad.

It felt wonderful that we became so close. My wife passed away a few years ago, but her children and I still have a great relationship.

Not sure what my point is

But you just never know where life will take you!

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:41 PM

marble falls (45,627 posts)

17. A lot of us were saying this in the sixties and seventies ...

three wonderful children and three grand marvelous kids later, I'm glad I didn't follow through like my brother has. My son and his wife decided to have no children in the nineties and kept their vow.

I think every generation has had these thoughts.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:45 PM

yonder (7,368 posts)

18. Our 30 something daughter feels the same,

while her brother and SIL are planning for kid(s).

I'm frustrated/angry/sad that we can't seem able to address and fix the problems we have to leave them a better future and am slowly losing hope that it may be too late anyway.

That said, GOTV. It's our only chance.

Reply to this post

Response to yonder (Reply #18)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:54 PM

bdamomma (61,280 posts)

70. I'm sure

our parents or other relatives felt the same way during WW2, things then were messed up too, but then again they didn't have a idiot as pResident.

We could change this around with voting like we have never done before. We got to.

Reply to this post

Response to bdamomma (Reply #70)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:22 PM

yonder (7,368 posts)

80. Perspective. Thank you.

Reply to this post

Response to bdamomma (Reply #70)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 11:35 PM

Warpy (101,593 posts)

92. Real estate and farm prices crashed in the 1920s

The birth rate cratered in the late 1920s and stayed very low until after WWII.

With the New Deal and the consumer society and decent pay for a day's work, things looked rosy enough that people in their late teens through their early 40s felt safe enough to have kids. This is the baby boom, not so much that women were having huge families, but that a large age range of women were finally having them after 20 years of not being able to afford to.

That's part of what's happening now. Wages have been depressed since the late 70s and kid in their prime child bearing years are often crushed by student debt. Few can afford children and the political situation is just one other disincentive.

It's not just in the US, ether. Pessimism about the future is holding down population growth in most developed countries.

Reply to this post

Response to Warpy (Reply #92)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 06:03 AM

CountAllVotes (19,678 posts)

98. Hello Warpy!!!!

Nice to see you old friend!!!

Hope you are doing well!!!

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 06:46 PM

sakabatou (38,584 posts)

19. Personally, it would be a financial choice not to have kids

as I'm on disability.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:14 PM

Sonny Mirviss (77 posts)

21. Maybe she's read "The Population Bomb", by Paul Ehrlich

1968.

Reply to this post

Response to Sonny Mirviss (Reply #21)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:26 PM

csziggy (33,279 posts)

24. Just found my copy of that book

It was part of the curriculum for the liberal college I attended in 1970-71. And it was part of the reason I never planned to have kids. Aside from the population problems, in those days there was a serious threat of nuclear war. Some of my classmates were planning to move to New Zealand as the place most likely to be survivable in case of WWIII.

Since I had grown up near where Pat Frank's "Alas Babylon" was set, I figured being close to a blast would provide a shorter span to suffer, so I have stayed put pretty much. But no kids that might have to live through a post apocalyptic world. Climate change might just be a slower version.

Reply to this post

Response to Sonny Mirviss (Reply #21)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 10:07 PM

former9thward (25,237 posts)

90. Really?

That book predicts mass starvation killing hundreds of millions the 1970s. Did that happen?

Reply to this post

Response to former9thward (Reply #90)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 01:42 AM

Sonny Mirviss (77 posts)

93. So, you got my point.

Few do.

Want some rye?

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:17 PM

FirstLight (12,654 posts)

23. Yep, my kids too.

I actually told them I didn't want them to bring children onto the planet because I wasn't sure if they were even going to have a "normal" adulthood - as the burning ship continues to sink.

They are 17 & 18, and have no plans to procreate... My son is obsessed with making enough $$ to build a bunker. That's his end game.

Reply to this post

Response to FirstLight (Reply #23)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:47 PM

murielm99 (28,447 posts)

33. I told my kids not to bring children into the world.

None of them have.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:35 PM

2naSalit (54,626 posts)

25. My siblings' children

have all chosen, except one, not to have them. Out of six children, and four grandchildren, my mother has one great grandchild. I like to think we've done our part in educating our next generations, they certainly are seriously concerned. I worry for them too.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:42 PM

TNNurse (5,742 posts)

29. We did not have children and do not regret that.

My husband (graduated from college in 72) often mentions Silent Spring. In that we have known things for a very long time.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:47 PM

Evolve Dammit (8,348 posts)

34. This is not new. Many have been thinking for a long time that this is unsustainable. We cannot in

good conscience, have children. Last 30 years or so. Seeing many families with more than 2-3? I'm not. And I know many parents with no children.

Reply to this post

Response to Evolve Dammit (Reply #34)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:03 PM

smirkymonkey (61,675 posts)

43. Wait, how can they be parents if they have no children?

Did you mean couples?

Reply to this post

Response to smirkymonkey (Reply #43)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:34 PM

cwydro (44,192 posts)

60. Lol!

I did a double take too!

Reply to this post

Response to smirkymonkey (Reply #43)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 07:39 PM

Evolve Dammit (8,348 posts)

120. Sorry; married couples. My bad.

Reply to this post

Response to Evolve Dammit (Reply #120)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 07:40 PM

smirkymonkey (61,675 posts)

121. No problem.

I thought that was probably what you meant!

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:48 PM

Sedona (3,537 posts)

35. I have three adult daughters...

None have reprduced and have no plans to.

I'm not compliaing.

To each his (and her) own.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:51 PM

Newest Reality (12,712 posts)

36. As an old Boomer...

I am not in any position to sire children, but I certainly wouldn't if I were younger and I think that is a sound decision, all things considered.

In fact, I agree with a view called, antinatalism. Since one's unborn progeny are unable to make the decision, the potential parents should take that into consideration in a compassionate way. There are many reasons that people have children and, now, there are many reasons not to. I support that.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:53 PM

bucolic_frolic (29,146 posts)

37. Fallout is imminent or soon

I tend to agree with her, but I will say some will survive - cave dwellers in isolated areas. The entire human thing is built on growth. More of everything, and more knowledge. But climate change in my view depends on how soon populations start declining and economies contracting. That will reduce resource depletion and climate change. Of course it's a hideous outcome. I think of it as the scenario in Barbara Tuchman's "A Distant Mirror" about the century of the 100 Years War and the Black Death. Villages were wiped out. Some places had more dead than they could bury for a long time. Take that and transplant it to our modern era.

If declines are gradual, or manageable, it could be milder.

But no kids because you think you know the future? Can she pick lottery numbers? She could raise a zero-net consumption baby. Everything used, public transit, passive solar home, that sort of thing.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:54 PM

paleotn (12,162 posts)

38. She's probably correct.

As we aren't doing jack shit to solve the underlying problem. Ooooh, that costs to much. We say that while Australia burns to the damn ground. We'll probably still say that when the US east coast burns to the damn ground. I don't blame her one bit. Who would want to bring children into some kind of Mad Max reboot?

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:54 PM

CountAllVotes (19,678 posts)

39. Good move

Smart young woman.

I saw this one coming 50 years ago.

ECOLOGY NOW was a slogan for environmentalism.

It was never taken very seriously.

It was easier to live with the idea of a disposable world with a never-ending bounty.

How very wrong they are.

i.e. Fires in Australia, species being wiped out. Just the beginning.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 07:57 PM

Kurt V. (5,624 posts)

40. Fertility rates have been dropping world wide for decades. Women are feeling their power and

Expressing it in different ways.

Reply to this post

Response to Kurt V. (Reply #40)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:22 PM

dewsgirl (14,762 posts)

56. It's like all these different facets of the Handmaid's Tale, are

emerging into our reality.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:02 PM

catbyte (28,148 posts)

42. I made the same decision back in the 70s & 80s for the same reason. I had no faith that humanity

would do the right thing. I thought if climate change didn't get us, overpopulation would. I really hoped I was wrong but sadly I wasn't. I'm going to be 65 in June and I've never regretted my decision. Our arrogance will be the death of us and so many other species on the planet. I'll be gone before the shit really hits the fan, but I see my 5-year-old & 8-year-old god-grandchildren and my heart aches for them. I so hope that we wake up before it all goes to hell but I just don't see it.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:03 PM

llmart (12,418 posts)

44. This is nothing new.

I remember some saying that back in the 60's.

I am so glad that I'm not as pessimistic as some on this board. I'm also so glad that I had my two children and that I now have a grandchild. Many women in their late 30's/early 40's (and beyond I guess) are paying thousands of dollars to do IVF just so they can have a child. The human biological urge to procreate is one of the strongest of human behaviors.

Some of those new babies may grow up to be people who find solutions to the problems that need to be addressed.

People are not going to stop having babies. I have never for one moment in my 70 years regretted having my two children.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:04 PM

DesertRat (27,992 posts)

45. My friend's 30 year old son said the same thing

Sad.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:08 PM

smirkymonkey (61,675 posts)

46. I never wanted children and didn't have them, and don't regret it at all.

I am in my mid-50's and I love my freedom. I also am the nervous type who would constantly be worrying about them if I did have any. I have 8 nieces and nephews and I fear for them all the time - between school shootings, the environment, declining career prospects, potential for addictions, violence in general, etc. I could never handle being a parent.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:08 PM

TexasBushwhacker (17,824 posts)

47. You don't have to add to overpopulation

There is a middle ground - adopt or be a foster parent.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:10 PM

Timewas (1,315 posts)

49. If I were 20 again

And just starting out I would not have a family either

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:10 PM

lunatica (52,758 posts)

50. My son made the same decision.

He died so any possibility of grandchildren is nil.

But I’m very relieved that he chose not to. Very relieved.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:11 PM

spike jones (1,016 posts)

51. I heard that in the fifties about nuclear war

Then along came Elvis.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:15 PM

MineralMan (141,578 posts)

53. I decided the same in 1965.

Glad I did, too.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:20 PM

warmfeet (3,321 posts)

54. I agree.

We certainly haven't made any inroads towards saving ourselves, or any other species. Why contribute to the problem?

Cut the problem off.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:22 PM

BigmanPigman (44,365 posts)

55. Smart decision.

I made that decision a long time ago but for different reasons. If I had to do it again I would add Climate Change to the list. The birth rate is going down in the US for the first time since 1900 and it is because people are finally thinking, wow, imagine that?!? The young adults are smarter than we give them credit for.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:24 PM

cagefreesoylentgreen (761 posts)

57. Happily Childfree

I decided I hated children and didn’t want any when I was in junior high and was bullied to the point of suicide by my peers. If children were as evil as them, I wanted no part of it.

Thirty years later, my attitude towards kids has softened and I like hearing my coworkers talk about their kids to me. I adore my nephew, who lives several states away. I just don’t care to bring one home with me permanently.

But junior high is also where I first heard about global warming (mid-80s), and that helped further solidify my decision not to have any of my own.

I do worry about my 8 year old nephew. He’s very interested in space and science, and wants to be an astronaut. Over Christmas I talked to him how hard he’ll have to work towards that goal, and maybe I went a little overboard in making him promise he’ll get to Mars someday. He’s still innocent enough to just see that as a grand adventure rather than as survival, but I think that’ll change as he gets older.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:27 PM

Baclava (10,841 posts)

58. Don't worry, plenty of people in India/Bangladesh will take their place

"India will soon become the world’s most populous country as India’s population is predicted to surpass that of China within the next decade."

and maybe China too, now that they did away with their one-child policy

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:30 PM

Mersky (4,849 posts)

59. There've been too many adults in need of parenting in my life.

Not sure how I could care for children as well. Climate change made the decision even more simple. And who knows? Maybe I’ll adopt or foster kids in a few years?

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:35 PM

PatrickforO (13,190 posts)

61. If I were a GenZ person, I am not sure I'd have kids, either.

As long as we live in this capitalist utopia, hold profits over the needs of people and organize ourselves around human greed instead of human need, why bother?

Until we grow up as a species, we put the very habitability of our planet in peril.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:37 PM

Marthe48 (8,043 posts)

62. My daughter and I were talking about choices

I told her that her Dad and I decided to observe "Zero Population Growth" which was a movement in the early 1970s. She and her husband opted not to have kids, for several reasons, one of which was planetary changes. I mentioned a program about life after humans, which I haven't watched, but heard about. She hadn't heard of it, so I googled it and came across something called Voluntary Human Extinction Movement, where we stop reproducing to phase the human race out to save the planet. She said, "I guess I'm part of a movement."

The trouble is, the people who might be better parents, at least in awareness of impact, won't have kids, and people who don't give a ff about the planet won't stop, and won't raise their kids' awareness.

I participated in the 1st Earth Day, and we observed it by planting trees or a garden almost every year. Our kids recycle, limit consumption and our daughter with kids is passing her habits along to her kids. I'm proud of them.

I don't blame the 20 something for opting out of parenthood. It is always scary to have kids, but seems worse lately.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:37 PM

MLAA (10,164 posts)

63. She is smart.

The single most impactful thing we can do is to go to a plant based diet. I don’t think enough people will, so I agree with her that it is too late and I applaud her gumption not to introduce more children to a painful short term future.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:44 PM

Tiggeroshii (11,088 posts)

66. I'm in my 30s and haven't had children for that reason (among others)

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:46 PM

Andy Canuck (255 posts)

67. Both my 20 somethings

have told me they are not having kids because of climate change. And I understand where they are coming from. It seems to be a wise decision given the prospect for the future.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:49 PM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

68. The planet doesn't need saving. It will outlast the human species by millions of years

If we don't leave, at some point the world will become our tomb.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:56 PM

ancianita (25,201 posts)

71. Neither does my 32 year-old son.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 08:58 PM

marlakay (9,505 posts)

72. My husband keeps saying the wrong ones

Are doing this, the thoughtful, smart people are deciding not to but the crazies are having lots of kids.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:01 PM

Texin (2,255 posts)

73. Well, she's ASSUMING she's going to have a choice about that!

If this can't be brought to heel, she will be compelled by Catholic-Evangelical male maniacs (and their female counterparts) to bear children - whether with a partner she chose to be with or whether she was RAPED by some random predator who hid in the shrubbery and forced her at gunpoint or by point of knife at her throat to submit.

Reply to this post

Response to Texin (Reply #73)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:35 PM

Bummfuzzle (154 posts)

84. Why would you even go there?

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:10 PM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

74. We might not be in this situation had we, the older generation, decided not to have kids.

Reply to this post

Response to Kaleva (Reply #74)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 10:36 AM

MineralMan (141,578 posts)

111. Some of us did just that. Not enough, apparently.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:11 PM

BeckyDem (7,088 posts)

75. She is likely correct too.

Heartbreaking.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:12 PM

handmade34 (21,378 posts)

76. m kids as well

no grandkids for me

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:15 PM

Hulk (6,547 posts)

77. No surprise...

A sad future, looking at the direction we AND the world are heading.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:18 PM

rainy (5,776 posts)

78. My 29 year old says the same thing🙁

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:21 PM

JHB (34,529 posts)

79. For perspective, some 20-somethings a generation ago said the same thing because of nuclear war

Plenty of them have kids now.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:24 PM

NCProgressive (1,315 posts)

81. There are a lot of people doing that

It is likely to be disastrous and not have much impact on the climate.

Having 1 child only is probably a better alternative to keep population neutral.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:46 PM

jcgoldie (8,450 posts)

85. Good

Outside of being some sort of scientist or a politician with enough power to have a meaningful voice in the debate... not making more humans is the best thing we can do for the planet I believe.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:50 PM

Olafjoy (937 posts)

87. Ditto on my 20 something

When I talk about him having a family, he looks at me like I’m crazy

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 10:01 PM

Bluesaph (400 posts)

89. I'll never have grandchildren from my son

For same reason. And my sister’s only two children will not have children so she will never be a grandmother.

My three daughters have given me four grand babies and I live for them. But sometimes I wish they hadn’t because the thought of their future suffering hurts.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Jan 6, 2020, 10:22 PM

Upward (113 posts)

91. No Kids, No Regrets

There's no way on god's green earth I could have raised a kid to be competitive in this environment.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 02:29 AM

Apple Fritter (131 posts)

94. didn't realize there were so many older people here

Not only do people choose not to have kids, but everyone is also starting a family later in life. there's Having kids during the late 30s and raising them in the 40's happens while birth rates are expected to decrease every year as my generation of millennials age up. Planned pregnancy at a young age is uncommon too. Birth control have made so many people so responsible. The the current state of things naturally represses everyone from procreation. sry late post night

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 05:39 AM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

95. twenty-somethings are young enough to probably fall victim to the ravages of climate change

The changes are taking place faster then earlier predicted.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 05:54 AM

Kaleva (29,385 posts)

97. Do any of us older folks worry about the suffering our twenty-something kids are going to endure?

The effects of climate change are taking place faster then earlier predicted.

Reply to this post

Response to Kaleva (Reply #97)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 10:42 AM

MineralMan (141,578 posts)

113. Climate change is a population issue.

I'm one of the "older folks." In 1965, at age 20, I decided, based on population growth numbers, not to father any children. I married women who agreed with that, and we didn't make any children.

I read "The Population Bomb." I studied global population issues. I made a decision. There are many others in my age group who made similar decisions. Not enough, however, to have forestalled one of the consequences of having too many people on this finite planet.

The warnings were there. People ignored them. Warnings about famine. Warnings about disease. Warnings about climate. Warnings about running out of resources. Warnings about sheer overcrowding of the planet. People ignored them, just as they are doing now, in vast numbers.

I did not ignore those warnings. Others I know did not ignore them, either.

Reply to this post

Response to Kaleva (Reply #97)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 10:43 AM

milestogo (11,252 posts)

115. Yes. I can see how they feel hopelessly screwed over.

They inherit our mess.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 06:12 AM

JustABozoOnThisBus (21,646 posts)

99. But the world's population will hit 8 billion in 2023.

Perhaps it's just first-world educated young adults who are making this plan.

Other areas of the world, different plan, or no plan at all.

Or does this non-procreation plan have a statistical correlation with race or religion? I don't think it's universal.

And, this planet will survive the human race by billions of years. Except for a meteorite hit 65 million years ago, mammals would not have had the space to survive, grow, evolve.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 06:36 AM

ck4829 (31,084 posts)

100. Kick

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 06:43 AM

Loki Liesmith (4,536 posts)

101. Her choice but she's more pessimistic than climate scientists.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 07:55 AM

exboyfil (16,241 posts)

103. On average even with insurance

having a child costs $5K. Nearly half of all births are funded by Medicaid.

In the future given the policies of the Republicans, I would not be surprised if many decide on sterilization given that both abortion and contraception will be more difficult to obtain.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 08:16 AM

greymattermom (5,663 posts)

105. My younger daughter, now 33

says the same thing. Another issue is affording day care. My older daughter is living as frugally as she can, wants children, and I plan to do the day care when she works, part time. They have one older car, eat only food she makes from scratch, and take the train to work. Their jobs reimburse their MARTA passes, so commuting is free.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 10:37 AM

StarryNite (7,608 posts)

112. Smart

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 10:42 AM

Jokerman (3,467 posts)

114. I started asking doctors about a vasectomy at 25.

It took me more than 10 years to find a doctor who would even discuss the subject with me.

They all said that I would change my mind but I never did.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 05:48 PM

jcmaine72 (1,667 posts)

118. I wish the evangelical bible-thumpers down the street from me felt the same way.

They have FIVE children, and the wife looks like she's pregnant again. Worse yet, they homeschool their progeny, undoubtedly so they can perpetuate their fairy tales without any hope of a real education interfering. These people have no shame.

What makes me sick is that the people of good conscience, like the young person you spoke with today, aren't having children while the religious nuts are still shooting them out by the truckload. It doesn't bode well.

Reply to this post

Response to jcmaine72 (Reply #118)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 10:52 PM

virgogal (10,178 posts)

126. Good lord,maybe they just like kids. I have six,my body,my choice.

Reply to this post

Response to virgogal (Reply #126)

Wed Jan 8, 2020, 01:22 AM

jcmaine72 (1,667 posts)

128. Did you read what I wrote? They're bible-thumping nuts.

A person can do whatever they like with their body, but keep your religion away from me. These people don't. They're always handing out pamphlets for their church, especially the husband.

Odd that anyone here would feel obligated to rush in and form loving shield around such people.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 05:57 PM

Joe941 (2,848 posts)

119. Who is going to pay my social security?

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Tue Jan 7, 2020, 11:21 PM

Collimator (1,306 posts)

127. It was in 1999. . .

And I was 40 years old and working at IKEA. I was very committed to recycling and salvaging and thinking about the environment for future generations even though I knew that I would never have children of my own.

A twenty-something co-worker and I were tossing broken items into the crushing dumpster* and I brought up my desire to waste as little as possible etc., etc., because tomorrow's children deserve a chance, blah, blah. My co-worker brought up the point that she thought that the world would hold together long enough for her to have children but didn't think things would be very good for the generation after that.

There was a bland acceptance in her perspective that troubled me. She wanted the good things in life, including having a family. But, she, like many of my co-workers, didn't feel like going through too much trouble to recycle or reuse or salvage and repurpose items. And she wasn't investing any angst into what her children and their children's lives would be like.

Correct me if I am wrong, but that sounds like nihilism to me. It was also short-sighted and selfish.

I have a much higher opinion of the young woman who doesn't plan on having children because of its impact on the environment--or because she couldn't guarantee that her children would live decent lives in a sustainable world.

Clearly, not every single breeding age person of the next generation will feel that way. The chances of our species going down for the count because no one will be having any babies in the future is zero.

The real issue is what sort of life can we offer to a reasonable number of people in the future. Total pessimism will not fix the future, of course. But thinking about the future beyond one's own personal desires and aspirations is part of the mindset needed to confront the challenges ahead.

* For those in Customer Service, even those who genuinely enjoyed helping people as I did, the crushing dumpster was the most blissful form of therapy ever invented.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Wed Jan 8, 2020, 03:22 AM

tandem5 (2,069 posts)

129. Cold hard scientific fact has little to do with the psychology of self fulfilling prophecy...

Besides, life on Earth has been in a tenuous position well before the advent of nuclear weapons or the internal combustion engine. We're not even safely positioned in our Solar System's own habitable zone. So look on the bright side: While we wait in silence, clutching our loved-ones, having made peace with our inevitable and self-inflicted end we might just suffer a super eruption or get hit by a medium sized meteor and die ironically by the rapid onset of a mini ice-age. I say bright side because that seems almost preferable to waiting and worrying for a couple of generations for the exact demise with which mother-nature will surely not oblige us.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Wed Jan 8, 2020, 08:43 AM

BluNoMatterHu (31 posts)

130. I chose not to breed...

for that reason, too. I saw what direction the world was going and I didn't want to subject another being to the horrors of humanity. Every time I see a child I think of what's in store for them and it reaffirms my choice.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Wed Jan 8, 2020, 09:50 AM

DFW (45,465 posts)

131. My soon-to-be 35 year old daughter feels differently

Her first child just passed 18 months, and #2 is due in June.

Her 19 month old daughter is already showing signs of being focused, funny, intelligent and headstrong--just like her mother. Our daughter was a handful growing up, but we tried to instill in her the knowledge that she could accomplish anything she set out to do. She has lived up to our expectations and more, and if she is putting more people in the world like that to carry on when we are gone, we can only approve.

Because of current bureaucracy, it took her 11 months to get U.S. citizenship for her first baby (it took me 2 hours for her in 1985 at the U.S. embassy in Bonn), but she did it, so the next generation of Democrats is on the way. We'll need them.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Wed Jan 8, 2020, 10:02 AM

Bradical79 (4,490 posts)

132. Yeah, I've heard that a lot

Not an unreasonable position. No actionable plan exists that adequately addresses climate change. The changes required are just too drastic for most to accept.

Reply to this post

Response to milestogo (Original post)

Wed Jan 8, 2020, 10:08 AM

Bradical79 (4,490 posts)

133. Adopt

I'll also just toss out there that if the only reason someone doesn't want kids is climate change, then adoption would be something to seriously consider. Plenty of kids already born who need parents.

Reply to this post

General Discussion (Forum)