Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(145,291 posts)
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 02:47 PM Jan 2020

GOP senator who erupted over Iran briefing shares awful new details



Now, in the interview with NPR’s Rachel Martin, Lee has gone into more alarming detail. Lee reiterated that officials “were unable or unwilling to identify any point” at which they’d come to Congress for authorization for the use of military force. Then this exchange happened:

MARTIN: What kind of hypotheticals were you putting to them in hopes of understanding when the administration sees a need for Congressional authority?

LEE: As I recall, one of my colleagues asked a hypothetical involving the Supreme Leader of Iran: If at that point, the United States government decided that it wanted to undertake a strike against him personally, recognizing that he would be a threat to the United States, would that require authorization for the use of military force?

The fact that there was nothing but a refusal to answer that question was perhaps the most deeply upsetting thing to me in that meeting.


Obviously, this was an extreme hypothetical. But the point of it was to discern the contours of the administration’s sense of its own obligation to come to Congress for approval of future hostilities. And it succeeded in doing just that, demonstrating that they recognize no such obligation.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)
5. I'm assuming they will fall back in line, but I am quite alarmed
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 03:09 PM
Jan 2020

at the looks on their faces. What happened in that meeting? I ordinarily can't stand either one of them, but whatever is going on it appears to be horrific.😳

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
6. I'm not a fan of any Senate Republicans
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 03:31 PM
Jan 2020

just the fact that he's speaking out is something. Most Republicans stopped criticizing Trump after that July 4, 2018 trip to Moscow...

usaf-vet

(6,186 posts)
7. They're both the male equivalents of "I'm concerned" Susan Collins of Maine.
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 03:52 PM
Jan 2020

Their reactions mean nothing when push comes to shove they will both follow Suzy C like good little boys and do what Moscowmitch tells them to do.

Turbineguy

(37,337 posts)
2. One thing is for sure
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 02:51 PM
Jan 2020

trump's supporters will support him even after the EMP strike shuts off their TV's.

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
4. Is it finally sinking in that King Donnie Dimwit the Adderall addict
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 03:00 PM
Jan 2020

is a danger to peace and stability in the world, and that he doesn't care about anything but money and his sick delusions of grandeur?

Alas, to only very few

aggiesal

(8,916 posts)
8. Yup, and he keeps crying ...
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 04:49 PM
Jan 2020

why he never receives the Nobel Peace Prize.

What an idiot.

Truly a Pendejo of the highest order.

IronLionZion

(45,447 posts)
9. If Dems had the Senate, we could have blocked authorization to use military force
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 05:14 PM
Jan 2020

Every election is important

geretogo

(1,281 posts)
12. The German people did not stand up to Hitler and the Nazi equivalent being the GOP will not either.
Thu Jan 9, 2020, 05:30 PM
Jan 2020

I'm afraid it will take Armageddon that the evangelicals and anti Christ Trump bring about before
they say " Oh my GOD what have we brought forth " .

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP senator who erupted o...