Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 11:12 AM Jan 2020

The Iranian missiles were meant to kill American troops?

Last edited Mon Jan 13, 2020, 03:12 PM - Edit history (1)

They have shown footage of the missile damage on several news programs this morning. If the troops had not gotten a warning, there would have been many casualties.

One missile hit where they ate their dinners. Another missile hit where they slept. It was like they threaded a needle with their missiles. They were very accurate.

Fortunately, the troops did get a warning that the missiles were coming. No doubt, the Iranians believed there would be American casualties. It was a miracle that there were none.

But now, the troops look at the damage done and they feel very lucky. They are fearful of the future, even though they are thankful of the present.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Iranian missiles were meant to kill American troops? (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2020 OP
That is why Iran gave ample warning time to Iraq. Zolorp Jan 2020 #1
Bingo. marble falls Jan 2020 #3
Precisely Sherman A1 Jan 2020 #9
The missile attack was all for show Renew Deal Jan 2020 #2
They just wanted to show that they could actually defacto7 Jan 2020 #4
Huh? DURHAM D Jan 2020 #5
One other thing that hansn't been talked about much: Dale Neiburg Jan 2020 #8
Of course they were accurate. atreides1 Jan 2020 #6
Most likely a warning to others in the region also...Netanyahu, the Saudis. brush Jan 2020 #11
I heard a military officer say on tv that the Iranian missiles DURHAM D Jan 2020 #12
75 years ago they claimed the Norden bombsight... flotsam Jan 2020 #20
Trump would blow up our own shit for a photo op. pwb Jan 2020 #7
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2020 #16
No they were not Sherman A1 Jan 2020 #10
Luckily, they heeded the warning. kentuck Jan 2020 #13
No luck about it Sherman A1 Jan 2020 #17
The missiles were obnoxiousdrunk Jan 2020 #14
Not true. The warning was from Iran. rockfordfile Jan 2020 #15
Not even close...they wanted NO part of dead Americans. AncientGeezer Jan 2020 #18
Until the Iranians tell us the attack coordinates, we don't know how accurate they were. Kaleva Jan 2020 #19
 

Zolorp

(1,115 posts)
1. That is why Iran gave ample warning time to Iraq.
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 11:16 AM
Jan 2020

They wanted to make sure nobody got killed. They also wanted to make a statement that they could have easily killed many Americans. This was a proportional response.

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
2. The missile attack was all for show
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 11:27 AM
Jan 2020

They weren't meant to hit anyone. That's why they gave a warning. Blow up some buildings, claim victory, and move on. By the way, were there any anti-missile systems at those bases? Why didn't they work?

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
5. Huh?
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 11:38 AM
Jan 2020

"the Iranians believed there would be American casualties"

No. They gave Iraq advanced warning knowing they would warn our military.

This time the Iranians were the grownups making Trump look like an idiot.



Dale Neiburg

(698 posts)
8. One other thing that hansn't been talked about much:
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 11:43 AM
Jan 2020

Appalling as shooting down the airliner was, at the end of the day Iran admitted being at fault. If the position had been reversed, can we imagine Individual-1 ever telling the truth? He's made Iran look good by comparison.

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
6. Of course they were accurate.
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 11:39 AM
Jan 2020

The Iranians knew where they can strike to create the most casualties...this was just a warning to the US about what could happen!

And where did the troops get that warning from? The Iranians weren't looking to kill, they were looking to scare...they wanted the US troops to know that they're vulnerable...and that a missile can drop on the mess hall or barracks, without any warning!

I'm willing to bet that the Iranians have people on the ground in the region...and that each US military base already has a bullseye on it...the Iranians probably know where to hit and what the best times are to inflict mass casualties...

Human intelligence gathering is a wonderful thing...especially when most Americans can't tell the difference between an Iraqi and an Iranian...or a Sunni and a Shia...

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
12. I heard a military officer say on tv that the Iranian missiles
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 11:49 AM
Jan 2020

were accurate within one meter of their intended target. Not sure how we know that but I thought it was interesting.

flotsam

(3,268 posts)
20. 75 years ago they claimed the Norden bombsight...
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 05:06 PM
Jan 2020

...could drop a bomb "into a pickle barrel" from 20,000 feet...The thing to keep in mind the unstated qualifier "ideally" which accounts for tons of explosives not on target. Commercial GPS is nearly as accurate and much cheaper-time has marched on.

pwb

(11,276 posts)
7. Trump would blow up our own shit for a photo op.
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 11:42 AM
Jan 2020

If you look from the air the craters spelled out, Fuck Trump.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
10. No they were not
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 11:45 AM
Jan 2020

The missiles were targeted to show that they COULD kill American troops and that was the point.

rockfordfile

(8,704 posts)
15. Not true. The warning was from Iran.
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 12:13 PM
Jan 2020

If they really wanted to kill, Iran would have unloaded with a lot more missiles.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Iranian missiles were...