General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNancy Pelosi responds to Trump's whining about the impeachment process
Link to tweet
Nancy Pelosi
@SpeakerPelosi
In the Clinton impeachment process, 66 witnesses were allowed to testify including 3 in the Senate trial, and 90,000 pages of documents were turned over.
Trump was too afraid to let any of his top aides testify & covered up every single document. The Senate must #EndTheCoverUp
Cirque du So-What
(25,942 posts)That's gotta sting
William Seger
(10,779 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Trump, you had a gaggle of lick-spittle toadies (GOP Congressmen) asking EXACTLY THE QUESTIONS YOU WANTED ASKED, AND whose 'witnesses' were called, so STFU you lying motherfucker.
Not to mention Sondland was your HANDPICKED ambassador, who contributed $1M to your campaign.
Such a fucking liar.
As such, I'm disappointed with Pelosi's response, myself.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Anything she (or any Dem) says is lost in a howling maelstrom of gaslighting bullshit.
What could she have said that would make an impact in such a mediascape?
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)He throws out lie after accusation after slander and it succeeds in turning up the volume, making everyone agitated, and flattening the crimespace he operates in. nothing any Dem says can rise above the din.
meanwhile, he's gutting the federal bureaucracy and replacing them with apparatchiks and bomb-throwers, or nothing.
EXACTLY LIKE PUTIN. he's adopted the GRU's techniques wholesale.
PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)Lately, I've found myself laughing out loud every time I hear a TV pundit say stupid shit like, "Her gambit to hold turning over the articles of impeachment has backfired." They, of course, go on to justify their statements with the "evidence" that Moscow Mitch & Senate Rethugs are unchanged, which only puts an exclamation mark on the pundits' stupidity. Pelosi's play is & always has been to effectuate a Democratic takeover of the Senate in 2020. It's not about trying to force Rethugs to play nice or even about Trump himself. Keeping that in mind, look more closely at what she just said. Her use of the term "coverup" is masterful. She's framing Senate Rethugs as co-conspirators to a cover-up...that's the kind of messaging that seeps into the ethos to upend red seats. Don't despair Mr. Lebowski. Nancy's always playing the long game.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)that just twists his sphincter shut so he has no recourse but to shit through his mouth.
wnylib
(21,487 posts)the word "coverup." We need to support this accurate label and repeat it. - OFTEN.
calimary
(81,322 posts)Hes AFRAID! We need to push that one straight into and up his nose and in his face and down his throat.
Hes CHICKEN!!! If everything were on the up n up, hed be ordering it all released, spread all over Pix Noise, and hate radio. All his witnesses would be marched onto the airwaves and every Sunday show, and more.
The mere reason hes demanding that it all be deep-sixed (or otherwise covered up) is because he knows theres a lot of incriminating shit in there.
What is he hiding (besides a shitload of EVERYTHING?)