Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grasswire2

(13,571 posts)
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:47 AM Jan 2020

Every media outlet has ignored the QUESTION regarding the Parnas tape.

Ask Lev, or his lawyer, what he understood Trump to be saying.

And if the answer is "he wanted us to get her fired"

Then the next question is "how did he expect you to fire a state dept employee?"

And the most direct question is "Did you have any feeling that he wanted physical harm to come to her?"

Come on, MSM!! They were all having drinks and dinner at the Trump Bar.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Every media outlet has ignored the QUESTION regarding the Parnas tape. (Original Post) Grasswire2 Jan 2020 OP
They are pushing the kindest narrative --that Trump wanted her fired. I say bullshit. triron Jan 2020 #1
yep Grasswire2 Jan 2020 #2
But HOW? IllinoisBirdWatcher Jan 2020 #4
And he didn't mean take her out to dinner. n/t Beartracks Jan 2020 #10
That question was asked of Lev's Lawyer. Trump was not asking Lev to fire her. tulipsandroses Jan 2020 #3
Yes, I heard Rachel say "threaten her life" but sort of BigmanPigman Jan 2020 #5
But how was this a legit thing to say cilla4progress Jan 2020 #7
I did not hear him say whether or not Trump was ordering physical harm. nt Grasswire2 Jan 2020 #9
maybe because their narrative makes more sense stopdiggin Jan 2020 #6
again I have said in several threads brettdale Jan 2020 #8
The media doesn't seem to be able to believe a smoking gun could be smoking. n/t Beartracks Jan 2020 #11
You're Fired! erlewyne Jan 2020 #12
A lot of the discussion ignores that Trump's command was directed to John DeStefano onenote Jan 2020 #13
Great post malaise Jan 2020 #14

tulipsandroses

(5,124 posts)
3. That question was asked of Lev's Lawyer. Trump was not asking Lev to fire her.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:10 AM
Jan 2020

That was addressed on Rachel Maddow's show. As far as firing Yavanovitch - The lawyer said that Trump was asking Johnny DeStefano and other staffers not Parnas.

BigmanPigman

(51,607 posts)
5. Yes, I heard Rachel say "threaten her life" but sort of
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:16 AM
Jan 2020

quickly, not wanting to really devote much time to it though.

stopdiggin

(11,314 posts)
6. maybe because their narrative makes more sense
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 02:17 AM
Jan 2020

than the gangland slaying of a U.S. ambassador?
Or because Trump could have had her dismissed (as he eventually did 13 months later) at any time he chose to?

erlewyne

(1,115 posts)
12. You're Fired!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 03:45 AM
Jan 2020

Why didn't pResident tRump say that a year ago? It was his unquestionable right.

What a sleaze-bag!

onenote

(42,704 posts)
13. A lot of the discussion ignores that Trump's command was directed to John DeStefano
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 07:05 AM
Jan 2020

DeStefano was the same aide that wrote the letter telling Sally Yates she had been fired by Trump. So why didn't DeStefano carry out Trump's command with respect to Yovonovitch? Good question. My guess is that DeStefano talked to someone at the State Department and was tol ignore Trump's order--something which we know aides did not infrequently. Trump's attention span being that of a gnat, he moves on and forgets about her for the next year. But the whole Ukraine/Biden thing gets going and he realizes she's still there, so this time he fires her. And, coincidentally (or not) John DeStefano, the guy who didn't carry out that command a year earlier, resigns the same day Yovonovitch is fired.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Every media outlet has ig...