Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 07:57 AM Jan 2020

Well, this REALLY isn't encouraging (Coronavirus) 👀

Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding @DrEricDing

HOLY MOTHER OF GOD - the new coronavirus is a 3.8!!! How bad is that reproductive R0 value? It is thermonuclear pandemic level bad - never seen an actual virality coefficient outside of Twitter in my entire career. I’m not exaggerating... #WuhanCoronovirus #CoronavirusOutbreak



2/ “We estimate the basic reproduction number of the infection (R_0) to be 3.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.6-4.0), indicating that 72-75% of transmissions must be prevented by control measures for infections to stop increasing...

3/ ... We estimate that only 5.1% (95%CI, 4.8-5.5) of infections in Wuhan are identified, and by 21 January a total of 11,341 people (prediction interval, 9,217-14,245) had been infected in Wuhan since the start of the year. Should the epidemic continue unabated in Wuhan....

4/ we predict the epidemic in Wuhan will be substantially larger by 4 February (191,529 infections; prediction interval, 132,751-273,649), infection will be established in other Chinese cities, and importations to other countries will be more frequent. Our model suggests that..

5/ travel restrictions from and to Wuhan city are unlikely to be effective in halting transmission across China; with a 99% effective reduction in travel, the size of the epidemic outside of Wuhan may only be reduced by 24.9% on 4 February. Our findings are...

6/ ...critically dependent on the assumptions underpinning our model, and the timing and reporting of confirmed cases, and there is considerable uncertainty associated with the outbreak at this early stage. With these caveats in mind, our work suggests that...

7/ a basic reproductive number for this 2019-nCoV outbreak is higher compared to other emergent coronaviruses, suggesting that containment or control of this pathogen may be substantially more difficult.”!!!! #wuhanvirus #CoronavirusOutbreak #ChinaCoronaVirus ...


11:06 PM - Jan 24, 2020















Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding @DrEricDing

I’ll be honest - as an epidemiologist, I’m really deeply worried about this new coronavirus outbreak. 1) the virus has an upward infection trajectory curve much steeper than SARS. 2) it can be transmitted person to person before symptoms appear — I.e. it is silently contagious!

9:10 AM - Jan 23, 2020


Source material for his assertations:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.23.20018549v1.full.pdf

About Dr Feigl-Ding:

68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well, this REALLY isn't encouraging (Coronavirus) 👀 (Original Post) Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 OP
They say it's worst than SARS . . . Iliyah Jan 2020 #1
I keep thinking of King's "The Stand." maddiemom Jan 2020 #25
Me too. Gulp. AllyCat Jan 2020 #35
I think of the pandemic movie "Contagion." nt tblue37 Jan 2020 #36
Captain Tripps Roland99 Jan 2020 #51
Would that make Trump the Walkin' Dude? Moostache Jan 2020 #57
Hillary/Nancy as Mother Abigail Roland99 Jan 2020 #64
Think Randall Flagg is still to appear. Pence is definitely a lieutenant. Hortensis Jan 2020 #65
Pretty sure it was created. BluNoMatterHu Jan 2020 #33
What's in the area of the outbreak? meadowlander Jan 2020 #62
What are you doing in preparation of a possible world-wide pandemic? Kaleva Jan 2020 #2
Me? Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #3
Just curious as to how seriously you, and others, take this. Kaleva Jan 2020 #4
Um... I posted about it on DU? Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #5
I apologize if I'm coming across as hostile to you 'cause that is not my intent. Kaleva Jan 2020 #10
I'm not panicking... yet. Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #11
Neither am I Kaleva Jan 2020 #17
There isnt MFM008 Jan 2020 #59
The Spanish Flu was spread like any other flu. By humans. Kaleva Jan 2020 #60
Strange reaction from some. smirkymonkey Jan 2020 #19
I appreciate your post DUgosh Jan 2020 #26
I posted it as information about something the public doesn't know much about, yet Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #27
Forewarned is forearmed... paleotn Jan 2020 #40
Sometimes EndlessWire Jan 2020 #66
I'm attending to my immune system - the same thing I do to protect myself from the flu rainin Jan 2020 #48
What an odd question, read about "Discussion Boards". nt USALiberal Jan 2020 #24
Discussing preparing for a possible worlfd-wide pandemic is what discussion boards are for. Kaleva Jan 2020 #50
Not OP, but spreading awareness seems positive, given how little else I can do. ramen Jan 2020 #30
Nothing more then what I'm doing preparing for climate change. Kaleva Jan 2020 #52
Best defense is what we're supposed to do every flu season.... paleotn Jan 2020 #38
You forgot "Get your vaccinations". Aristus Jan 2020 #43
Thanks! Exactly.... paleotn Jan 2020 #47
It seems that most die from pneumonia. So that vaccine is a must have LiberalArkie Jan 2020 #58
Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding should know better My Pet Orangutan Jan 2020 #6
Right Roy Rolling Jan 2020 #9
If you want to track the actual epidemiology of the Coronavirus, I've posted it here My Pet Orangutan Jan 2020 #13
"never seen an actual virality coefficient outside of Twitter in entire career. I'm not exaggerating Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #14
At this stage My Pet Orangutan Jan 2020 #16
It's also unintelligible English. He's never seen a virality coefficient in a textbook or a paper? Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2020 #21
Measles has an r0 of 14-18 My Pet Orangutan Jan 2020 #23
Fair criticism. No idea what he meant by that, but here's his bio: Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #29
I agree, that's unnecessary hyperbole paleotn Jan 2020 #41
Updated: R_0 2.5 My Pet Orangutan Jan 2020 #42
Flu level R_0. Not surprising and makes better sense. paleotn Jan 2020 #46
The new estimate is from one of the three scientists who made the original estimate Ms. Toad Jan 2020 #61
If it's bad - tell the truth rainin Jan 2020 #49
+++ still_one Jan 2020 #53
Very scary TEB Jan 2020 #7
😳👀, HOLY MOTHER OF GOD terrifying to see an epidemiologist, dewsgirl Jan 2020 #8
Mad Cow was gonna get us too bucolic_frolic Jan 2020 #12
The point of what he wrote is that this isn't like Mad Cow or SARS n/t Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #15
Well that's what he says. It's his scientific opinion. bucolic_frolic Jan 2020 #18
If you read the tweets you see the 95% confidence interval of 3.6 to 4.0 around estimate of 3.8. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2020 #20
On the assumption the identification rate is constant, My Pet Orangutan Jan 2020 #22
FWIW, here's the article he's quoting: muriel_volestrangler Jan 2020 #28
Thanks! Added it to the OP Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #31
This map shows an exponential increase in cases Crazyleftie Jan 2020 #32
Note the lead author of the paper has now downgraded the R0 value to 2.5 muriel_volestrangler Jan 2020 #34
+++ My Pet Orangutan Jan 2020 #44
If I remember correctly, the last couple of outbreaks were curtailed defacto7 Jan 2020 #37
Other epidemiologists are more sanguine abou this. cab67 Jan 2020 #39
Calm, folks.... paleotn Jan 2020 #45
+++ still_one Jan 2020 #54
+1000000000000 at140 Jan 2020 #55
At end of day, best defense against any virus is...... at140 Jan 2020 #56
Stay away from freshly slaughtered meat markets... Baclava Jan 2020 #63
Many thanks, Dennis. Nt raccoon May 2020 #67
Thanks for the post KewlKat May 2020 #68

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
1. They say it's worst than SARS . . .
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:07 AM
Jan 2020

21st Century, with all the knowledgeable medical expertise at hand but mother nature can still kick our asses.

Side note: I hope this was not man made:

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
57. Would that make Trump the Walkin' Dude?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:23 PM
Jan 2020

And maybe Oprah is Mother Abigail?

Trying to make light of what is rapidly looking VERY ominous...

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
65. Think Randall Flagg is still to appear. Pence is definitely a lieutenant.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 05:31 PM
Jan 2020

Trump might be Trashcan Man before Flagg appears and he decompensates: "My life for you."

BluNoMatterHu

(31 posts)
33. Pretty sure it was created.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 10:23 AM
Jan 2020

Look at what’s in the area of outbreak. Think the worst of humans and they’ve either considered it or already done it. I’ve given up all hope of a decent world. Humans deserve to be taken out.

Kaleva

(36,301 posts)
4. Just curious as to how seriously you, and others, take this.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:17 AM
Jan 2020

If you aren't doing anything or not making plans, then you might not think this is much of a deal. At least to the many of us who live in North America.

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
5. Um... I posted about it on DU?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:20 AM
Jan 2020

I'm not an epidemiologist, nor am I a health care worker. I plan on doing what I've been doing since retiring... staying the hell home.

Why the hostility?

Kaleva

(36,301 posts)
10. I apologize if I'm coming across as hostile to you 'cause that is not my intent.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:38 AM
Jan 2020

People generally expend great effort when faced with a serious situation and do little or nothing when the possible threat is considered to be very minor or of no consequence to themselves. It's human nature to behave this way.

Your lack of action or planning indicates to me that you personally don't think that this new virus presents any threat to you. At this time.

Again, nothing personal. I'm just curious as to how seriously people here at DU are taking this.

Kaleva

(36,301 posts)
17. Neither am I
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:51 AM
Jan 2020

I'm already well prepared to live in isolation with my wife for about 45 days if it comes to that. Thankfully, we are on the downside of winter.

MFM008

(19,814 posts)
59. There isnt
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 03:25 PM
Jan 2020

Much you can do with an airborne virus.
In the 1918 flu pandemic even isolated
pacific islanders got it.

Kaleva

(36,301 posts)
60. The Spanish Flu was spread like any other flu. By humans.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 03:48 PM
Jan 2020

"T H E S A M O A I S L A N D S.
A Commission appointed by the Governor-General of New Zealand to inquire into the circumstances and causes of the introduction of epidemic influenza into the Islands of Western Samoa reported that in their opinion there was no doubt whatever that epidemic pneumonic influenza was introduced into Western Samoa by the S.S. ” Talune” on the 7th November 1918. This ship left Auckland (where influenza was seriously prevalent) on the 30th October, and influenza broke out among the passengers and crew during the voyage to Samoa. Within seven days after her arrival, pneumonic influenza was epidemic in Upolu. It spread with great rapidity throughout this island and later throughout Savaii, the other island of Western Samoa."

https://flutrackers.com/forum/forum/oceania/h5n1-tracking-ai/20443-1918-influenza-pandemic-in-the-south-pacific

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
19. Strange reaction from some.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 09:04 AM
Jan 2020

I see this as a serious matter. We are overdue for a worldwide pandemic. It it only sensible to be alarmed by this one. As of right now, there is no cure for it.

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
27. I posted it as information about something the public doesn't know much about, yet
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 10:05 AM
Jan 2020

I'm certainly not trying to fear-monger.

paleotn

(17,917 posts)
40. Forewarned is forearmed...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:03 AM
Jan 2020

Thanks for posting real information! No need to run to the hills. Its R_0 is high, but not near smallpox high. So, by doing the things we're supposed to do every flu season, the vast, vast majority of us will be fine. It's panic and craziness that's always the real threat, instead of logically processing factual information as it becomes available and making rational choices based on it.

EndlessWire

(6,531 posts)
66. Sometimes
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 10:37 PM
Jan 2020

it helps to gather info to evaluate a situation properly. I don't think anyone posting info has done anything wrong.

They are showing on the news film footage where China is building the first emergency hospital. But, then they said there was yet another new hospital to boot. Things are happening overnight.

I believe in handwashing, covering your mouth and nose when necessary, and staying home. The immediate problem is always food.

Also, let's see how Trump et al use this situation to help themselves.




.

Kaleva

(36,301 posts)
50. Discussing preparing for a possible worlfd-wide pandemic is what discussion boards are for.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:55 AM
Jan 2020

We discuss. You may wish to ignore the situation and hope it just goes away and you have the right to do that.

ramen

(790 posts)
30. Not OP, but spreading awareness seems positive, given how little else I can do.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 10:16 AM
Jan 2020

Other than that, washing my hands and not travelling. Why, what are you doing?

Kaleva

(36,301 posts)
52. Nothing more then what I'm doing preparing for climate change.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:58 AM
Jan 2020

As i mentioned in another post, my wife and I can go into isolation for about 45 days. We have enough LP gas, food, prescription medicene on hand to last that long .

paleotn

(17,917 posts)
38. Best defense is what we're supposed to do every flu season....
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 10:54 AM
Jan 2020

Wash your hands often and correctly. Carry and use hand sanitizier. Though it may not be effective against this corona strain, it does help cut down on secondary infections. Don't sneeze or cough in the open. Use your damn elbow or a tissue. If you feel sick, stay home!! Thus reducing who you come in contact with. Be cognizant of how much you touch your mouth, nose or eyes. Other than health authorities isolating those with or suspected to have contracted the pathogen, that's all we can do. ....But on the positive side, those simply things are very effective.

Aristus

(66,371 posts)
43. You forgot "Get your vaccinations".
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:09 AM
Jan 2020

AFAIK, no one has yet announced a vaccine for the coronavirus. I don't even know if there is one in development. But one of the best things we can do to prepare ourselves for possible exposure and infection by coronavirus is getting immunized against the diseases for which a vaccine exists.

One of the worst effects of viral illnesses is the way they leave us vulnerable to co-infection with other diseases because our immune system is too busy with the one infection to have resources to fight another.

So get your flu shot, and if you are of the age to get the pneumonia vaccine (under age two or over sixty-five, and at-risk patients in-between), get that, too.

All of the precautions you mentioned above are important, and should not be shirked. Add vaccination to them.

paleotn

(17,917 posts)
47. Thanks! Exactly....
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:20 AM
Jan 2020

Reduce the chances of secondary infections. Give your immune system some added ammo.

My Pet Orangutan

(9,249 posts)
6. Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding should know better
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:26 AM
Jan 2020

than make over the top alarmist statements to the press. Predictions like "thermonuclear pandemic level bad" are stupid beyond belief.

Roy Rolling

(6,917 posts)
9. Right
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:37 AM
Jan 2020

Shoot the messenger, that’s the better response.

That’s like when the house is on fire, complaining the alarm is too loud.

This virus does have pandemic characteristics and capabilities. I’m “taking cover” now.

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
14. "never seen an actual virality coefficient outside of Twitter in entire career. I'm not exaggerating
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:43 AM
Jan 2020

That sounds pretty qualifying to be considered "alarmist".

My Pet Orangutan

(9,249 posts)
16. At this stage
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:49 AM
Jan 2020

these projections are highly sensitive to the assumptions made Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding, some stated like the identification rate, some unstated, and all without evidence, anecdotal or otherwise.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,002 posts)
21. It's also unintelligible English. He's never seen a virality coefficient in a textbook or a paper?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 09:11 AM
Jan 2020

Surely he reads scientific journals in his field.

Never seen this medical measure outside of Twitter?

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
29. Fair criticism. No idea what he meant by that, but here's his bio:
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 10:15 AM
Jan 2020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Ding

Eric L. Feigl-Ding is an American public health scientist who has received awards for his work in epidemiology, nutrition, and health economics. He is a visiting scientist at the Harvard School of Public Health and Chief Health Economist and Senior Vice President with Microclinic International. He is a Paul and Daisy Soros Fellow, and a WEF Global Shaper. He was also a 2018 Democratic candidate for Congress from Pennsylvania's 10th congressional district, as an advocate for public health, drug safety, and science.

Ding was a whistle-blower in the drug safety risks of the painkillers Vioxx, Celebrex, and Bextra, and was recognized in The New York Times, and in the book Poison Pills: The Untold Story of the Vioxx Drug Scandal.

Ding founded the Campaign for Cancer Prevention, a 6 million member online cancer education and fundraising campaign medical research, featured in The New York Times He is a recognized drinking water health advocate and founded ToxinAlert.org, as a public alert tool to warn communities about drinking water contaminations to prevent future lead poisonings like the Flint Water Crisis.

Early life and education
Feigl-Ding was born in Shanghai, China, and his family immigrated to the US when he was age 5. He was raised in Central Pennsylvania, and was an alum of the Pennsylvania Governor's School for Health Care. As a child, doctors diagnosed that he had developed a baseball-size tumor in his chest. He received an initial disease prognosis of less than 5 years to live, but he survived with medical treatment he received at Hershey Medical Center.

He attended The Johns Hopkins University, graduating with Honors in Public Health and Phi Beta Kappa. He earned his dual doctorate in epidemiology, and his doctorate in nutrition, with a doctoral minor in biostatistics, from Harvard at age 23. He then completed his postdoctoral fellowship at the Harvard School of Public Health. At Harvard, he has taught in more than 2 dozen courses in public health and clinical research, and received the Derek Bok Distinction in Teaching Award from Harvard College. He attended Boston University School of Medicine, but did not complete the M.D. degree because of competing commitments.

Work
Feigl-Ding's work focuses on epidemiology, nutrition, health economics, and the prevention of population-wide disease. He has published over 100+ scientific papers, including major reports in the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, PLoS Medicine, The Lancet. His body of research together have garnered over 36,000 external citations.

He was a whistle-blower in the drug controversy surrounding the safety and risks of the dangerous painkillers Vioxx, Celebrex, and Bextra. Chief corresponding author of a priority JAMA report, he was recognized for his role in The New York Times,. Dr. Ding's key study established that Merck should have known the serious health dangers of Vioxx several years before the drug was pulled off the market, as chronicled in the book Poison Pills: The Untold Story of the Vioxx Drug Scandal.

He was also Chief Health Economist and Director of Epidemiology of Microclinic International, as co-principal investigator of several intervention programs for obesity and diabetes prevention in the US and abroad. He has also led the Team Up 4 Health program with Kentucky's Bell County Health Department to improve rural obesity. He also developed and led adolescent nutrition public health programs with Statens Serum Institut of the Danish Ministry of Health. He also co-developed the community health program for obesity/diabetes used by the UN and currently serving hundreds of thousands of UNRWA Palestinian refugees in Jordan and Palestine since 2015.

Having survived a childhood battle with a baseball-sized tumor, Feigl-Ding founded the Campaign for Cancer Prevention, and was featured in Newsweek, The New York Times,. He is also known for developing a direct-to-science model for accelerating cancer research, and advocate of crowdfunding for medical research. His efforts had raised over $500,000 in public donations for innovative cancer research, and he led cancer prevention advocacy platforms totaling over 6 million members.

He was also a consultant to the World Health Organization, advisor and report chairman for the European Commission, as judge for the VH1 Do Something Awards, and an expert member of the Global Burden of Disease Project and US Burden of Disease Collaboration. His work has been cited by directors of CDC and CMMS in the framework of the "Million Hearts" Initiative, his research thrice recognized as ‘Best of American Heart Association’. A former keynote presenter at Google TechTalk, Feigl-Ding has been featured in Google Research for development of a 130-year cohort study of Major League Baseball of the dangers of obesity and mortality in athletes.

Political Campaign
Feigl-Ding ran for Congress as Democratic candidate representing his native Pennsylvania's 10th congressional district. He campaigned on a progressive platform advocating science, healthcare for all, public health, and not taking corporate PAC money. During the new PA 10th district primary, his grassroots campaign outraised every opponent with $300,000 in just 10 weeks, including the Republican incumbent Scott Perry. He received the most national endorsements in the primary, and garnered the support of individuals and groups including: Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-CA), DNC Vice-Chair and Rep. Grace Meng (D-NY), Rep. Brian Baird (D-WA), 314 Action, Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus's ASPIRE, AAPI Victory Fund, Harrisburg City Council President Wanda Williams, Science Energy & Environment Change, At The Table, United Brotherhood of Carpenters, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, and the International Union of Operating Engineers. His campaign was also featured in Science Magazine.

Recognitions and Awards
His work has been featured in several books, including CauseWired: Plugging In, Getting Involved, Changing the World, Poison Pills: The Untold Story of the Vioxx Drug Scandal, Zilch: The Power of Zero in Business, Shift & Reset: Strategies for Addressing Serious Issues in a Connected Society, The Networked Non-profit, and Thinfluence.

He has received awards, including the Boston Chamber of Commerce's Outstanding Young Leader Award (2012), the American Heart Association's Scott Grundy Excellence Award (2015), the 'Best of the American Heart Association' (2013, 2014, 2015), the Sigma Chi Mark V. Anderson Leadership Award (2016), the CUGH's Global Health Project of the Year Prize (2014), the Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans (2008), and the Harvard University Derek Bok Distinction in Teaching Award (2009). He was also recognized by Craig Newmark as among “16 People and Organizations Changing the World in 2012”.


YMMV

paleotn

(17,917 posts)
41. I agree, that's unnecessary hyperbole
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:06 AM
Jan 2020

If people would take the numbers he's stating and do a tiny bit of googling on their own, they'll see this is like a very dangerous flu virus, but not even close to being as communicable as smallpox. It's not a fucking apocalypse.

Ms. Toad

(34,072 posts)
61. The new estimate is from one of the three scientists who made the original estimate
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 04:12 PM
Jan 2020

?s=20

Original paper:

We estimate the basic reproduction number of the infection (R_0) to be 3.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.6-4.0), indicating that 72-75% of transmissions must be prevented by control measures for infections to stop increasing.


https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.23.20018549v1

rainin

(3,011 posts)
49. If it's bad - tell the truth
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:46 AM
Jan 2020

I'm tired of parental types thinking we can't handle the truth. Oh no, there will be panic!!!!!!!

NO, tell me it's bad, when it's bad. I'll protect myself.

bucolic_frolic

(43,166 posts)
12. Mad Cow was gonna get us too
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 08:41 AM
Jan 2020

I think they should compare their assumptions to the extensive data they have on flu epidemics. And their hyperbolic predictions about chicken epidemics. Viruses mutate. Even worst case, it will be a different epidemic in 8 weeks.

Meantime push the panic button.

bucolic_frolic

(43,166 posts)
18. Well that's what he says. It's his scientific opinion.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 09:01 AM
Jan 2020

What degree of probability is associated with his modeling?

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,002 posts)
20. If you read the tweets you see the 95% confidence interval of 3.6 to 4.0 around estimate of 3.8.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 09:08 AM
Jan 2020

In other words, 19 times out of 20, with this data, the real value will be within the confidence interval which is pretty tight around 3.8.

My Pet Orangutan

(9,249 posts)
22. On the assumption the identification rate is constant,
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 09:20 AM
Jan 2020

rather than rising as the population and physicians become more widely informed of the disease symptoms. This is not comparable to SARS where the authorities denied the problem for 9 weeks.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,318 posts)
28. FWIW, here's the article he's quoting:
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 10:11 AM
Jan 2020
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.23.20018549v1.full.pdf

Thread replying to the OP one here:




It points out the article's authors have already lowered their R0 estimate to 2.5:







(that's from "Infectious disease modeller/epidemiologist. Director of J-IDEA and the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis", as quoted here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-51148303 )


defacto7

(13,485 posts)
37. If I remember correctly, the last couple of outbreaks were curtailed
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 10:53 AM
Jan 2020

by natural mutation. I'd wait to see if the outbreak becomes a real pandemic before expecting the worst. That's no comment on the info. I like to stay on top of it.

paleotn

(17,917 posts)
45. Calm, folks....
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:15 AM
Jan 2020

Process the information logically, ignoring the hyperbolic statements. Even hyperbole by those with lots of letters at the ends of their names. It's asymptomatically communicable, human to human. That's the key piece of info I've been looking for. That's not good, but at R_0 3.8 +/-, it's less contagious than mumps (for those of us old enough to remember mumps), far less contagious than smallpox and waaaay less than measles. Higher than most flu strains, but not unmanageable. Comply with CDC's flu season guidelines and I'll bet you any amount of money you'll be just fine and I'll retire a very, very rich man.

at140

(6,110 posts)
56. At end of day, best defense against any virus is......
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:07 PM
Jan 2020

Get enough sleep, eat good nutrition and Wash hands as often as you can.
If your immunity is low, wear a mask in crowded places.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
63. Stay away from freshly slaughtered meat markets...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 05:01 PM
Jan 2020

The role of China’s wet markets in the coronavirus outbreak

A mysterious lung virus that has so far killed 17 people and sickened hundreds more may be the latest infection to come from China‘s wet markets.

“It likely originated in some non-human animal and jumped to a human,” said Dr. Isaac Bogoch, an infectious disease specialist at Toronto General Hospital.

The narrow, crowded markets — brimming with everything from freshly caught fish to live poultry and reptiles — are “a breeding ground” for new and dangerous infections, said Evangelyn Alocilja, a professor and researcher of biosystems at Michigan State University.

The close contact between humans and a wide array of live animals makes it easier for viruses to jump between species, she said.

Wet markets — open marketplaces with stalls selling fresh meat and fish — are considered a traditional form of food retail in large Asian cities.

What makes the markets particularly risky as coronavirus lingers is the Lunar New Year, a peak travel season for Chinese citizens. Shoppers will likely flock to wet markets to stock up on foodstuffs for holiday dishes and celebrations.

https://globalnews.ca/news/6441321/coronavirus-china-wet-markets/


----------------------

The Huanan Seafood Market where it all started

A 61-year-old man who was a regular shopper at the Huanan Seafood Market was the first person to die from the virus. Authorities had since shuttered the market where the outbreak of this virus is believed to have begun on January 1 and banned the trade of live animals at wet markets on Wuhan, China on Wednesday.

Before the Huanan market closed, vendors there sold processed meats and live animals, including chickens, donkeys, sheep, pigs, foxes, badgers, bamboo rats, hedgehogs, and snakes. The close proximity of shoppers to stall vendors and live and dead animals in wet markets make them prime breeding grounds for zoonotic diseases, which means they spread from animals to people.

These zoonotic diseases pose a pandemic risk as they are carried by viruses that have not been circulating in humans before, therefore specific immunity to these viruses are absent in humans.

Wet markets put people and live and dead animals in constant close contact making it easy for a virus to jump from animal to human.



Scientists around the globe are still working to understand the virus better, such as it’s origins and how contagious it is. Initially appeared to spread only by very close contact within a family such as hugging, kissing, or sharing eating utensils but now evidence show that more distant contact such as sneeze or cough could spread the virus.

https://cj.my/115844/wuhan-coronavirus-originated-from-market-that-sold-wildlife-illegally/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Well, this REALLY isn't e...